To me, this just goes to show how much of an individual decision "rankings" are. Everyone has their own concerns: costs, location, faculty, clinical hours/procedures, average board scores, number of students specializing, etc.
Bill mentioned that state-of-the-art facilities need to have talented faculty to back them up, and I agree. Also, for him and others, the technology at a school isn't important. This is fine. For me, however, technology is a huge deal. I'm the type of guy who never used a paper planner despite buying several of them, but after buying a Pocket PC I can't live without my planner. I could list several more examples in my life similar to this. Technology is going to be a huge part of my practice since it excites me so much.
Maryland is very appealing to me because of its new building - some may think I'm strange, but this is the type of thing that will motivate me more as a dental student (like a Pocket PC motivated me to manage my time). To me, technology is more important than cost. $50,000 or even $100,000 (yes, I'm serious) extra to be in a far more state-of-the-art building is worth it, because it will make me a more excited and motivated student, which will make my experience in dental school more valuable.
This certainly isn't to say that Maryland is a better school, but it is to say that it's a better school for me. Like many have said, it's something that each person needs to consider for themselves, regardless of "propaganda" or what other people say.