• Set Yourself Up For Success Webinar

    October 6, 2021 at 2 PM Eastern/11 AM Pacific
    SDN and Osmosis are teaming up to help you get set up for success this school year! We'll be covering study tips, healthy habits, and meeting mentors.

    Register Now!

  • Site Updates Coming Soon

    Site updates are coming next week on Monday, Wednesday, and Friday. Click the button below to learn more!

    LEARN MORE

Designating MD AND/OR MD/PhD

hello311

Full Member
Jun 28, 2017
12
6
11
  1. MD/PhD Student
Often in secondary applications there is a spot to specify whether or not to be considered for MD if you are not accepted to the MD/PhD. I've generally been checking both MD and MD/PhD consideration for these, but I was wondering if it would be viewed poorly if you didn't choose to be considered MD-only as well? The implication being that you aren't wholly committed the to MD portion of the track. I know it must be more complicated than this considering funding source and career goals, but just wondering what people thought.
 
Upvote 0

moggat

MudPhud
5+ Year Member
Oct 14, 2015
170
211
166
Hive of Scum and Villainy
  1. MD/PhD Student
I'm not in admissions (obviously) but I can't imagine that it will significantly influence your application either way. Other people have worried that clicking "consider me for MD after" will make the committee think you're not committed enough for the combined degree. I suspect it's a purely administrative question, and the committee doesn't care either way (or even see the answer). Just know that if you do choose to be evaluated as an MD applicant after MDPhD, at a lot of schools you'll be thrown into the pool later and may be at a disadvantage timing wise.
 
Upvote 0

s_med

Full Member
2+ Year Member
Sep 14, 2016
77
51
81
  1. MD/PhD Student
the committee doesn't care either way

Second this. I believe at most institutions, this is an administrative checkbox that determines whether your application goes to the bottom of the MD adcom's stack after MSTP rejection.

If an MD/PhD committee rejects you for this asinine reason, consider it a bullet dodged.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
Upvote 0
About the Ads
This thread is more than 4 years old.

Your message may be considered spam for the following reasons:

  1. Your new thread title is very short, and likely is unhelpful.
  2. Your reply is very short and likely does not add anything to the thread.
  3. Your reply is very long and likely does not add anything to the thread.
  4. It is very likely that it does not need any further discussion and thus bumping it serves no purpose.
  5. Your message is mostly quotes or spoilers.
  6. Your reply has occurred very quickly after a previous reply and likely does not add anything to the thread.
  7. This thread is locked.