Destroyer #60

This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.

osimsDDS

Full Member
10+ Year Member
5+ Year Member
15+ Year Member
Joined
Jun 8, 2007
Messages
925
Reaction score
2
Points
4,571
Location
SO/NOR-CAL
  1. Pre-Dental
Advertisement - Members don't see this ad
I agree that this molecule has 3 tertiary carbons but when you look at their answer i believe its wrong...the first one is the carbon on the ring that branches off (ill call that C-1) then the next one is C-2 and then C-4

They say the tertiary carbons are C-2, C-3, C-4...C-3 is secondary not tertiary so i have no idea what they are talking about here...someone please confirm this thanks
 
what edition do you have in my edition of april 08 it clearly explains it the first tertiary is on the ring the next tertiary is the next carbon and the next tertiary is two carbons over.
 
Mine looks like this

Photo238.jpg
 
exactly Dr. green got it right thats what it should look like but in the back the answers have #1 placed in the middle of 2 and 3 haha, must be the old edition
 
exactly Dr. green got it right thats what it should look like but in the back the answers have #1 placed in the middle of 2 and 3 haha, must be the old edition
osims my edition has that too and it is correct!

Numbering starts on the functional group not on the ring itself
 
The carbon that holds the ring is not chiral. The rings is not substituted at all in the pic here,and therefore it will be two of the same molecules. According to that pic how is the carbon on th ring chiral.???
 
The carbon that holds the ring is not chiral. The rings is not substituted at all in the pic here,and therefore it will be two of the same molecules. According to that pic how is the carbon on th ring chiral.???
I don't think they are talking about chirality. They are talking about naming the structure...

I would name it as 1,3-dimethylpentylcyclohexane, but they are saying its wrong!

What do you think?
 
I don't think they are talking about chirality. They are talking about naming the structure...

I would name it as 1,3-dimethylpentylcyclohexane, but they are saying its wrong!

What do you think?

I would name it as 2-cyclohexyl,4-methyl,hexane
 
Last edited:
I agree, I would also name it as 2-cyclohexy, 4-methyl, hexane because that way you have a longer chain.
you have hexane at the end and so do I...what do you mean by your chain is longer?
 
Im pretty sure that you always name it the way that will have the most substituents, as long as the chains lengths are equal.
 
the correct name is 2-cyclohexyl-4-methylhexane dont get cofused with phenyl since this is not a benzene.
 
Top Bottom