hoyas, you are misinterpreting basic organic chem semantics.
when they have a reaction and they list reagents, u assume they put all the reagents in together at once. however, this is different from when they list the reagents as: 1) xxx 2) xxxxxx 3) xxxxxxxx. This means they put xxx in, then they remove the product from the other junk, and then they put xxxxxx in, then they remove this product once again and they put xxxxxxxxx in.
By the time you get to step 4, the base is long gone.
does this help?
I read the link, and this is what he said in response to your question about road map 6
the grignard is a strong base. H30+ is going to donate a proton and cause the formation of an -OH group. Since the reaction involves a strong base, the least substituted product is going to form.
if the reaction occurs in an strong acidic medium, then the most substituted product will be formed
the reaction is a oxirane with a grignard. the response by albuterol is perhaps misleading because of the order in which he went about explaining it. it certainly sounds like you misunderstood him.
What Albuterol is saying is that first the grignard reacts. Since the grignard is a base, it is a base-catalyzed ring openning. This means it forms the less substituted products. However, at this point in time it is an alkoxide product because because it is in basic solution. Then the next step is to add an H+ (acidic). This happens long after the oxirane has already been cleaved. Thus the alkoxide turns into an alcohol.
does this make more sense?