Determining oxidation state is usually pretty straight forward for me. But there's a few cases I've encountered which throw me off.
Here's an example: H2O2. Here, my approach was "well, oxygen is always -2, so that means that the H must be +2" but then the other approach is "well, hydrogen is always +1 so that means oxygen is -1".
Usually, the goal is to figure out the oxidation state of an element that's not known which is bonded to one that is known. For example, in MnO2, to figure out the oxidation state of Mn, I would say that it is +4 because oxygen is always -2.
But what if it's a formula, like H2O2, where both elements are supposed to be "known" so there seems to be two alternative answers? What is the approach in that case?
Here's an example: H2O2. Here, my approach was "well, oxygen is always -2, so that means that the H must be +2" but then the other approach is "well, hydrogen is always +1 so that means oxygen is -1".
Usually, the goal is to figure out the oxidation state of an element that's not known which is bonded to one that is known. For example, in MnO2, to figure out the oxidation state of Mn, I would say that it is +4 because oxygen is always -2.
But what if it's a formula, like H2O2, where both elements are supposed to be "known" so there seems to be two alternative answers? What is the approach in that case?