- Joined
- May 3, 2013
- Messages
- 215
- Reaction score
- 413
Did you complete a formal postdoc? In what area? Do you believe it was worth the training/lower pay, or do you wish you'd gone directly into practice?
Did you complete a formal postdoc? In what area? Do you believe it was worth the training/lower pay, or do you wish you'd gone directly into practice?
I did a formal 2-year post-doc in neuropsych that was highly specialized in concussion assessment/management. No other choice but to do a post-doc given the requirement for neuropsych. No regrets.
Really? Not even one letter?
For me: yes, two-year in neuropsych at a VAMC. Very much enjoyed it, and for me, it was worth the time. I probably learned as much on fellowship as I did in my training up to that point.
As with folks above, "no ragrets."
Yes. Research position in psych dept at a university with postdoc hours through the clinic in the lab. Well worth it. I would be a much worse researcher and therapist. Not sure if this is relevant to you since primary practice was never my goal.Did you complete a formal postdoc? In what area? Do you believe it was worth the training/lower pay, or do you wish you'd gone directly into practice?
Yes. Rehab & Neuropsych. 2yr at AMC. It's basically required to be faculty at any AMC and get hired at most but not all jobs.
Not to thread hijack, but I'm genuinely curious: I've been hearing from some rehab psychologists that a formal post-doc isn't necessary to actually be boarded in rehab psych. What are people's thoughts around this?
Similar to neuropsych, a "formal" postdoc is not necessarily required, but if you did not do one, you have to have a ton of extra documentation as to how your informal situation had adequate supervisory and didactic experiences to meet the minimum requirements.
Similar to neuropsych, a "formal" postdoc is not necessarily required, but if you did not do one, you have to have a ton of extra documentation as to how your informal situation had adequate supervisory and didactic experiences to meet the minimum requirements.
D22 (Rehabilitation Psychology) put together the Baltimore Guidelines ~10yrs ago, akin to the Houston Guidelines. There is/was some disagreement about 1yr v 2yr requirement. I personally believe it needs to be 2yrs, but I think they kept the knowledge areas and said it could be 1 or 2 years.Not to thread hijack, but I'm genuinely curious: I've been hearing from some rehab psychologists that a formal post-doc isn't necessary to actually be boarded in rehab psych. What are people's thoughts around this?
2 yrs neuro and rehab at a "Top 100" hospital (I highly suspect those titles are about as meaningful as those "who's who in XXXX"). Informal, part time, forensic post doc semi-overlapping. MSCP with practica afterwards.
Of all that, the neuro has had the greatest financial impact. I would not have done a formal post doc if I was a generalist.
Did you complete a formal postdoc? In what area? Do you believe it was worth the training/lower pay, or do you wish you'd gone directly into practice?
I believe CA also requires a formal postdoc for licensure. Anyone confirm?Keep in mind that certain states require a formal postdoc to be licensed. Oregon is one that comes to mind.
I swear, it seems like I've seen >100 hospitals claiming to be a "Top 100" site.
Also, so wait, you're saying those ads for the country's best dermatologist or cardiologist in all those airline magazines aren't to be trusted? Crud.
Well, there are actually a lot more than 100 hospitals in the top 100. There are several hospital rating systems out there, so I'm sure some hospitals are touting some questionable creds. "We were rated in the Top 100! (in small print: by Autoworld)
I was rated #1 psychologist in the country (by my wife and my mom).
If it's not printed on a mug on your desk, it doesn't count.
What if you don't have a desk on which to put the mug?
Time to buy a desk.
Keep in mind that certain states require a formal postdoc to be licensed. Oregon is one that comes to mind.
I believe CA also requires a formal postdoc for licensure. Anyone confirm?
Did you complete a formal postdoc? In what area? Do you believe it was worth the training/lower pay, or do you wish you'd gone directly into practice?
Thanks everyone, for the responses! Some of the posters may be familiar enough with my previous threads, but long story short is that I accepted an informal private practice postdoc after graduation this past Fall. The position was advertised with a big focus on training/mentoring. However, when I struggled to meet productivity deadlines about five months into the job, my supervisor became rather abusive, toxic, and threatening (despite stating that the quality of my work was the best they'd seen by a resident).
I did a research postdoc on a federal training grant, so I guess that's semi-formal? It bought me time to think through my next steps. Not having to see many patients for a while was nice.
I'm sorry that happened to you. There are far too many of these stories in our field.
I encourage you to look for independent practice positions if you are license-eligible or if a site will allow you a grace period to obtain your license. It's tough getting your feet wet when you begin practicing independently, but if you network and develop your peer support system, and use other resources available to you when you need help (your licensing board, your insurance company, professional organizations), you'll most likely be able to find the help you need.
yes. At a CCC (stayed on after internship), split role 60/40 clinical/research. It was great additional training and I'm sure helped me get a tt job.
I will say, at least for some specialty areas, it can be a "now or never" type of situation when choosing formal vs. informal. Every year I've reviewed postdoc applications, there are always a handful of people who now want a formal postdoc in neuro after starting or finishing an informal one. There is definitely a bias against these applications, as I have never seen one seriously considered for acceptance. This would have been at several VA sites, YMMV at other places.
college counseling center...the structure was similar for all postdocs in that there was an "apprenticeship" component...some chose leadership, outreach, supervision, training, etc...no one had yet asked for a research focused apprenticeship, but it has remained as an option.You had 40% protected research time at a community counseling center? What sort of research were you doing? How was it funded? Was it 1 year or 2? Did you apply for tt jobs while on internship?
No so fast. I was just licensed there, per our current business needs. I don't even see patients in my full-time current job, mind you. Again, my post doc was NOT a formal training program. I met their requirements because I had 1.5 years of documented supervised clinical work that totaled up to the 500 (or 600?) direct contact hours requirement for the post-doc experience.
Frankly, I think some people fudge. Did I really have 500 or 600 actual face-to-face hours over 1.5 years?. I don't know. Nine-Ten years out...and its kinda like who gives a ****... ya know?
I will say, at least for some specialty areas, it can be a "now or never" type of situation when choosing formal vs. informal. Every year I've reviewed postdoc applications, there are always a handful of people who now want a formal postdoc in neuro after starting or finishing an informal one. There is definitely a bias against these applications, as I have never seen one seriously considered for acceptance. This would have been at several VA sites, YMMV at other places.
Were these applications "never seriously considered for acceptance" because they were lower-quality, or were similarly qualified applicants universally rejected due to a preexisting bias alone? I think the distinction is important.