- Joined
- May 1, 2006
- Messages
- 100
- Reaction score
- 0
Can anyone tell me the difference between a DO and a MD?
Can anyone tell me the difference between a DO and a MD?
Can anyone tell me the difference between a DO and a MD?
now in a country like the UK, i think DOs are akin to chiropractors.
British DO and American DO are best thought of as completely different degrees, although they share similar historical roots. DOs in America have 4 years of medical education plus residency and a scope of practice equivalent to MDs, while British trained DOs only learn the musculoskeletal aspects of osteopathy - ie. the manipulation. So, an American DO in Britain has full medical privileges, while a British DO in America will have a scope of practice similar to a Chiropractor.
Confusing?...you bet.
I believe that recently (within the past few months) American trained DOs were given full rights to practice within the same scope as an MD.
British DO and American DO are best thought of as completely different degrees, although they share similar historical roots. DOs in America have 4 years of medical education plus residency and a scope of practice equivalent to MDs, while British trained DOs only learn the musculoskeletal aspects of osteopathy - ie. the manipulation. So, an American DO in Britain has full medical privileges, while a British DO in America will have a scope of practice similar to a Chiropractor.
Confusing?...you bet.
Initials of perceived supremacy!
They both are physicians, but MDs are better standardized test takers.
Also, there is also some kind of philosophical difference, which I really question is real anymore for why students do one over the other. Personally, I believe it is a way for the DOs to feel better if they are not good at taking the MCAT. If there is this huge philosophical difference, then why does everyone with a questionable MCAT score apply to both I know?
Not to fan the flame and get the DOs all in a frenzied state. It is something I have noticed from several friends that have applied to both. The DO schools were always back up until they did not get accepted to the MD schools and to the DO schools. Then, they were preaching the philosophical differences and how they really did not want to go to MD school anyway. It was their parents pushing them that way.
I say whatever. You still are a physician. A MD only helps you get a residency better and you do not have to explain the initials to the general population. Just be happy if you get into either one because many would settle for either initials!
😕 😕 😕 This has me so flabbergast, I don't know how to start other than saying that this is a load of crap. MDs are better at standardized tests? Says who? While yes, there may be some students that can't make it into allopathic schools, but I bet that a large portion of those students also won't make it into osteopathic schools either.
I have nothing against students who want to go for their MDs, but there are many people on this very board that are choosing DO, not because of their fear of not getting into an allopathic school, but because they either embrace the philosphy or they just want to be a physician and are not overly concerned of their initials. I, personally, see a DO has having a more open mind and willing to include the patient in their own health care.
I'm sorry, but this really burned me.
Krisss17
I don't want to start a war here, but why does there seem to be such defensiveness from the DO crowd? If this is the path you want to pursue, why feel like you have to justify it and prove it's what you 'really wanted to do'?
Also, I have a problem with the blanket assertion that DO's are more "willing to include the patient in their own health care." This is a tired stereotype, and just as annoying as, "DO's are just people who couldn't get into allopathic med school."
I don't want to start a war here, but why does there seem to be such defensiveness from the DO crowd? If this is the path you want to pursue, why feel like you have to justify it and prove it's what you 'really wanted to do'?
Also, I have a problem with the blanket assertion that DO's are more "willing to include the patient in their own health care." This is a tired stereotype, and just as annoying as, "DO's are just people who couldn't get into allopathic med school."
I don't know about you, but I'm pretty darn happy with my $198 mp3/video player. And it's not an iPOD. That's like saying you have to have the BMW just because it's a BMW.In the long run, there probably isn't any huge difference once one starts practicing with a DO or MD, but it's like mp3 players. There are probably a lot of players that are less expensive yet equally as good as the Ipod, but you just gotta get that $400 IPod Video just because its an Ipod.
about 0.5 GPA
about 5-10 points on the MCAT
about 10 points of IQ
and about a billion in ego
Getting into a DO school is less competitive than an MD school. Not that the MCAT really determines if you'd be a good doctor, but I've seen students get into DO with pretty low MCAT scores. Had they applied to MD, they'd probably never stand a chance. Would you want your doctor to admit to you that they got a really bad MCAT score? I don't know about you guys, but I'd like to believe that the doctors that have treated me did very well in on their tests and in school. At the same token, most veteran doctors wouldn't be able to get into an MD school if they had to reapply with their old application cuz med school has gotten SO competitive and SO much harder to get into. In the long run, there probably isn't any huge difference once one starts practicing with a DO or MD, but it's like mp3 players. There are probably a lot of players that are less expensive yet equally as good as the Ipod, but you just gotta get that $400 IPod Video just because its an Ipod.
😕 😕 😕 This has me so flabbergast, I don't know how to start other than saying that this is a load of crap. MDs are better at standardized tests? Says who? While yes, there may be some students that can't make it into allopathic schools, but I bet that a large portion of those students also won't make it into osteopathic schools either.
I have nothing against students who want to go for their MDs, but there are many people on this very board that are choosing DO, not because of their fear of not getting into an allopathic school, but because they either embrace the philosphy or they just want to be a physician and are not overly concerned of their initials. I, personally, see a DO has having a more open mind and willing to include the patient in their own health care.
I'm sorry, but this really burned me.
Krisss17
Both are physicians. Neither degree confers the distinction of making anyone a "better" physician than the other - that's up to the individual. MD focuses more on biochem (from what I hear their biochem is KILLER). DO has biochem (personally our class could have been better - except the genetics. That was AWESOME), but DO also has OMM. That being said, did you know Harvard offers a short course on the basics of OMM to MDs????? Apparently it's VERY popular.
OMM. Some think it's a sham. Some swear by it. I can honestly say that I knew nothing about it before I came to school. So. I have this muscle spasm problem in my shoulder... and I discover that rather than go on muscle relaxants for 2 or 3 weeks to break it, I can get it manipulated away in about 10 minutes. hm. My daughter broke her collarbone and has a 50 degree angle in it now. As a result, one scapula has sat higher than the other and she used her shoulders differently from one side to the other. Two OMM sessions and her scapulae are equal, her shoulders are level, and she has equal range of motion. hmm. Yes, she did PT. Sham? Seems to work for us for certain things. Would I trust it to "cure CF" as I've heard purported? No. But I do think it could help with some of the muscular issues from working to breathe.
I think DOs can offer a distinct service that can bypass some of the medications that MDs offer. However, I don't think that either set of initials makes a better doctor than the other. I've seen bad DOs and I've seen bad MDs. I've also seen great both and mediocre both.
So, the difference you ask? Letters behind their name. Nothing else.
Anyway, I plan on working in underserved areas in the US and abroad, and will get 2 board certs. (internal and general surg). As long as I have a roof over my head, food, and people to meet that will benefit from my skills, I'll be a happy camper!
Would you want your doctor to admit to you that they got a really bad MCAT score? I don't know about you guys, but I'd like to believe that the doctors that have treated me did very well in on their tests and in school.
Getting into a DO school is less competitive than an MD school. Not that the MCAT really determines if you'd be a good doctor, but I've seen students get into DO with pretty low MCAT scores. Had they applied to MD, they'd probably never stand a chance. Would you want your doctor to admit to you that they got a really bad MCAT score? I don't know about you guys, but I'd like to believe that the doctors that have treated me did very well in on their tests and in school. At the same token, most veteran doctors wouldn't be able to get into an MD school if they had to reapply with their old application cuz med school has gotten SO competitive and SO much harder to get into. In the long run, there probably isn't any huge difference once one starts practicing with a DO or MD, but it's like mp3 players. There are probably a lot of players that are less expensive yet equally as good as the Ipod, but you just gotta get that $400 IPod Video just because its an Ipod.
I have gotten into some pretty good programs, and seriously considered schools such as UVA or UPENN, but I've whittled my picks to PCOM or VCOM.
I will pay money to hear if you followed through with all of that, particularly the bold. Board certified in IM and Surgery? You must have a split personality. That's like working for the IRS and Enron at the same time. Your brain can't handle the ethical conflict. You'll spontaneously combust.
I will still pay for the chance to hear from you that you pulled it off. And I would applaud (and pity) you.
Thanks, I needed the laugh.
Plus I'm a card carrying member of MENSA baby, and have a proven photographic memory. Learning = easy for me. I rarely studied in college and didn't even review for the MCAT.)
The Gunner-Fearing Gunner... I love it! Don't ever change.😳
My mentor has 3 board certs in different areas, is a woman, and has like 3 kids. If she is correct, she tells me she is one of only a few people in the country with board certs. Pretty cool 😀 Plus I'm a card carrying member of MENSA baby, and have a proven photographic memory. Learning = easy for me. I rarely studied in college and didn't even review for the MCAT.
Fact of the matter is I can go to pretty much any medical school I want.
I will pay money to hear if you followed through with all of that, particularly the bold. Board certified in IM and Surgery? You must have a split personality. That's like working for the IRS and Enron at the same time. Your brain can't handle the ethical conflict. You'll spontaneously combust.
I will still pay for the chance to hear from you that you pulled it off. And I would applaud (and pity) you.
My mentor has 3 board certs in different areas, is a woman, and has like 3 kids. If she is correct, she tells me she is one of only a few people in the country with board certs.
This is a ridiculous post. If someone got a "really bad" MCAT score, they wouldn't get into medical school at all. You're talking about the difference between people who have average MCAT scores (25ish) versus people who have high scores (30ish). A 24-25 is the fiftieth percentile on the MCAT. That's not a "really bad score." Considering that the pool of MCAT takers is already well above the average in intelligence and test-taking ability for the population in general, an average scoring MCAT taker would be a perfectly competent physician. It's not like you need to be a genius to be a physician anyway. What you do need is at least average intelligence and a whole lot of elbow grease. Oh, and it helps tremendously too if your head is not stuck too far up your derriere. 🙂Getting into a DO school is less competitive than an MD school. Not that the MCAT really determines if you'd be a good doctor, but I've seen students get into DO with pretty low MCAT scores. Had they applied to MD, they'd probably never stand a chance. Would you want your doctor to admit to you that they got a really bad MCAT score? I don't know about you guys, but I'd like to believe that the doctors that have treated me did very well in on their tests and in school. At the same token, most veteran doctors wouldn't be able to get into an MD school if they had to reapply with their old application cuz med school has gotten SO competitive and SO much harder to get into. In the long run, there probably isn't any huge difference once one starts practicing with a DO or MD, but it's like mp3 players. There are probably a lot of players that are less expensive yet equally as good as the Ipod, but you just gotta get that $400 IPod Video just because its an Ipod.
Agree. I don't own any kind of MP3 player at all. Nor do I own a car. So how are people supposed to judge what kind of doctor I'm going to be? 😱 😉I don't know about you, but I'm pretty darn happy with my $198 mp3/video player. And it's not an iPOD. That's like saying you have to have the BMW just because it's a BMW.
Guess I'm just not as pretentious as some folks. I'd rather find something that is a good fit for me regardless of the name brand or the cost (as long as it's safe and works well).
Oooooooo, Aaahhhhhhhhh. Perhaps we can just anoint you king of kings right now. I mean, MENSA, wow. Can't be too many docs smart enough to get in there.
And a "proven" photographic memory. Ouch. I'm sure that patient that needs that intubation before the retropharyngeal abscess suffocates him will be sure darn pleased you can remember what color blanky you slept on in kindergarten.
Also, sorry to shoot your mentor's words down, but there are more than a few with multiple board certifications. Just ask all the meds/peds people walking around. Or maybe every single surgeon who does a fellowship.
But, hey, I'm sure with your down-to-earth attitude, patients will flock to you. I myself bow to your superiorty.
![]()
What are the board certs? IM specialists are often boarded in IM and their specialty in five years. Surgery and IM is a different story because you'd be looking at seven-eight years.
DO vs. MD? The difference is between the ears of the person reading them. I'm not in the mood for a flamewar today. The biggest difference is probably the median cost of the training given the relative number of state-funded allo schools vs. state-funded osteo schools.
And as far as my memory, I only say that its "proven" because I was tested as a kid. I memorized the entire "A" section of a phone book, and was able to recall any number a week later when the doc told me a name, or vice-versa. I could go on 😛 It comes in very handy when my recall time is next to nothing for anything I see or hear once. Some peope claim a photographic memory have no merit to make that claim and can't back it up.
Get laid or something!
IM , Surgery/Pediatric , Surgical Critical care
Everything's relative, but I'd imagine to you it would be yes and yes.Can you read or are you just stupid?
I have always been first in my class, scored fantastic on everything, and the "card carrying member of MENSA" comment was supposed to be comedic (I do have a card tho, haha 😛 ) I guess you lost your sense of humor!
And as far as my memory, I only say that its "proven" because I was tested as a kid. I memorized the entire "A" section of a phone book, and was able to recall any number a week later when the doc told me a name, or vice-versa.
I really have no clue why you are you bitter.
MD = Lexus
DO = Toyota
Ok. The whole point of the MP3 player/iPod analogy is to state what many (or as it seems) pre-meds feel about DOs, that they are pretty much on par with MDs, but just having that MD name sounds better, like how saying, "i got a bmw" sounds better than "i got a lexus".
As for the MCAT differences, I don't know about you guys and I will get flamed for this statement probably, but even though 5 pts in the MCAT realistically isn't that significant, it's more about the effort most of the pre-meds have taken to raise that superficial score so it's 30ish. Getting into an allo school with a 25 is REALLY tough to do, but we all studied our arses off to get that 30ish score just to satisfy those damn ad com people. To get into med school with a 25 kinda feels like taking the easy route (yes, i know that some people studied very hard to get that score still).
That's just it: you can't tell how much effort someone put into studying based on his or her MCAT score. Yeah, studying more tends to correlate with a higher score, but it's only fair to compare the before and after for each individual. In other words, you can't compare your 35 to someone else's 25 and say that you must have worked ten points harder, whatever that would even mean. I've had students who busted their butts, retook the Kaplan course (and completed every d*** test in the library), and they couldn't break a 30 even after taking the real deal multiple times. But they started out with diagnostic scores in the low teens. So for them, getting up to the mid twenties was a major accomplishment, and they worked really hard to do it. You are rightly proud of having raised your score from a 7 to a 9 in VR. Well, a couple years ago I had two kids who both scored 14 on VR....cold, on their diagnostics, before studying one single day. You gonna sit there and tell me that those kids worked harder than you did for your 9? 😎As for the MCAT differences, I don't know about you guys and I will get flamed for this statement probably, but even though 5 pts in the MCAT realistically isn't that significant, it's more about the effort most of the pre-meds have taken to raise that superficial score so it's 30ish. Getting into an allo school with a 25 is REALLY tough to do, but we all studied our arses off to get that 30ish score just to satisfy those damn ad com people. To get into med school with a 25 kinda feels like taking the easy route (yes, i know that some people studied very hard to get that score still). I really am glad for people who want to go to DO because they prefer Osteo over Allo. To people who are defending DOs who DON'T truly know the medical differences in Osteo/Allo, just stop.
For those who are saying, "My iPod crashed on me, or my Sony blah blah mp3 player works better", man you guys are analyzing this simple analogy WAY TOO DEEPLY.
Everything's relative, but I'd imagine to you it would be yes and yes.
Chest thumping.
The reason for my sarcasm was not because of who you are or what you went through. Anyone who survived what it sounds like you did has every right to be happy and celebrate.
What I disdain, now as an attending, as a former resident, as a former med student, and at its worst as a former pre-med student is the chest thumping that goes on. All the "I'm the 2nd coming of medicine" that everyone with an IQ over 160 seems to believe.
There is sooooooooo much more to being a good doctor than having brains. I may have brain envy, that's for sure--I've never been accused of being Einstein's heir.
But I'll tell you this. A piece of advice passed on to me from the smartest doc I've ever met--a DO chief I had during my surgical internship who ended up going into a cardiothoracic fellowship (truly one of only a few). He told me and the other interns, "I really don't care how great of a genius you are. I don't really care if you're a *****. That won't matter during this year. I only want you to care about your patients. I'd 10x rather have you be a ***** who cares than a genius who doesn't."
If you count med school, I've been doing this medicine thing now for 12 years and I know what he said to be true. A callous genius is dangerous.
Get board certified in 30 specialties. Carry your MENSA card. Become a Chair at Johns Hopkins. Thump your chest all you want. What will make you a good physician is caring about who's in your office or in your OR and treating them like they're the 2nd coming.
I'd disagree that the appropriate word is bitter, but regardless of semantics, now you know.
Please don't be the person who thumps their chest about all of their superior qualities. Personally, I'm amazed at the gifts people like you have. They're stunning and a blessing I wish more of us had.
But you'll make your mark by using your gifts rather than displaying them--whether on a forum or in person.
I guess I've shown my age and can be just brushed off as a "bitter" 33 year old fart. I by no means mean to imply I'm the greatest most caring doctor, certainly there are those better than me, but anyone with the gifts you have has the chance to really be special, not just a chest thumper. We already have too many of those.
That is an impressive set, looks like maybe ten years PGY?
👍Bruce, if you're still reading this, more certs doesn't equal superior. You're better off doing one thing well than doing 3 things half assed.
👎You want to avoid gunners so you're willing to forgo an elite education in order to hang out at VCOM? A pissant school slapped together in the middle of nowhere? Think about it, you could be retracting for Michael Acker and instead you'll be dressing up for class in Blacksburg? Heading out for some really important rotations in places like Christiansburg, Giles, Galax and Roanoke? If that's your choice then you'll fall in line behind the great parade of brilliant thinkers who could barely tie their own shoes.
Very insightful. Thank you.