Differences in Content between Berkeley Review and Examkrackers?

[christachristaj]

---

Members do not see this ad.

I am at the very beginning of my MCAT study schedule, and I am using both Examkrackers and Berkeley Review books. I just finished reading the chapters on translational motion from both EK and BR. There was a lot of overlap, but there was some content that differed between them (i.e. EK went more into detail about multiplying vectors, but left out 1 of the equations for a uniformly accelerating body that was in BR). I have to admit I was a little troubled by this because I was considering relying more on EK for content review, and only using the passages from BR for practice. Now I am worried that if I don't use both sets (which will require a substantial amount of time), I will be missing valuable information. Am I being too nitpicky? Did anyone else have similar fears?

 

[TheAnonymous]

I am at the very beginning of my MCAT study schedule, and I am using both Examkrackers and Berkeley Review books. I just finished reading the chapters on translational motion from both EK and BR. There was a lot of overlap, but there was some content that differed between them (i.e. EK went more into detail about multiplying vectors, but left out 1 of the equations for a uniformly accelerating body that was in BR). I have to admit I was a little troubled by this because I was considering relying more on EK for content review, and only using the passages from BR for practice. Now I am worried that if I don't use both sets (which will require a substantial amount of time), I will be missing valuable information. Am I being too nitpicky? Did anyone else have similar fears?

I think your being too nitpicky, pick one, read it, and do as many questions as you can and in that way you will eventually learn all the formulas that you really should know