Discography- New study

This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.

GMEN

Attending
10+ Year Member
Joined
Nov 4, 2008
Messages
30
Reaction score
0
Points
0
  1. Attending Physician
Advertisement - Members don't see this ad
HOT OFF THE PRESSES! Just wondering if any of you have any opinion on this.. Will this article change the way you practice? Thank all

SPINE
Issue: Volume 34(21), 1 October 2009, pp 2338-2345


2009 ISSLS Prize Winner:
Does Discography Cause Accelerated Progression of Degeneration Changes in the Lumbar Disc: A Ten-Year Matched Cohort Study

Carragee, Eugene J. MD*; Don, Angus S. FRACS*; Hurwitz, Eric L. DC, PhD†; Cuellar, Jason M. MD, PhD‡; Carrino, John MD§; Herzog, Richard MD

Study Design: Prospective, match-cohort study of disc degeneration progression over 10 years with and without baseline discography.
Objectives. To compare progression of common degenerative findings between lumbar discs injected 10 years earlier with those same disc levels in matched subjects not exposed to discography.
Summary of Background Data. Experimental disc puncture in animal and in vivo studies have demonstrated accelerated disc degeneration. Whether intradiscal diagnostic or treatment procedures used in clinical practice causes any damage to the punctured discs over time is currently unknown.
Methods. Seventy-five subjects without serious low back pain illness underwent a protocol MRI and an L3/4, L4/5, and L5/S1 discography examination in 1997. A matched group was enrolled at the same time and underwent the same protocol MRI examination. Subjects were followed for 10 years. At 7 to 10 years after baseline assessment, eligible discography and controlled subjects underwent another protocol MRI examination. MRI graders, blind to group designation, scored both groups for qualitative findings (Pfirrmann grade, herniations, endplate changes, and high intensity zone). Loss of disc height and loss of disc signal were measured by quantitative methods.
Results. Well matched cohorts, including 50 discography subjects and 52 control subjects, were contacted and met eligibility criteria for follow-up evaluation. In all graded or measured parameters, discs that had been exposed to puncture and injection had greater progression of degenerative findings compared to control (noninjected) discs: progression of disc degeneration, 54 discs (35%) in the discography group compared to 21 (14%) in the control group (P = 0.03); 55 new disc herniations in the discography group compared to 22 in the control group (P = 0.0003). New disc herniations were disproportionately found on the side of the anular puncture (P = 0.0006). The quantitative measures of disc height and disc signal also showed significantly greater loss of disc height (P = 0.05) and signal intensity (P = 0.001) in the discography disc compared to the control disc.
Conclusion. Modern discography techniques using small gauge needle and limited pressurization resulted in accelerated disc degeneration, disc herniation, loss of disc height and signal and the development of reactive endplate changes compared to match-controls. Careful consideration of risk and benefit should be used in recommending procedures involving disc injection.
 
Will look at the full text of the article, but my first ? would be;

"Was there a clinic difference (VAS, function) associated with increased disc degeneration in the discography group?"

From my understanding of the literature out there, only HIZs and Modic endplate changes have been associated with increased pain.
 
Carragee is the Holt of his generation.

And puts out fairly regular discography trashing biased articles.
Yet he continues to do discography in his practice.

Waiting for his disc preserving needles to come to market....
 
Seems to me that publishing a lot of discography papers causes brain damage - or does brain damage cause one to write a lot of discography papers?
 
So as a fellow this paper should basically be ignored? Thanks for the input!
 
Thank you Dr. Carragee for giving more fodder to the lawyers. We in the pain field are deply appreciative...
 
I think this is the ortho spine guy from Stanford right?

Yes, he's COMPLETELY biased. cant take any of his work seriously. Cohen over at Hopkins put out a Paper in Pain Physician Journal that refuted this guys studies. Essentially, Carragee's previous studies in appropriately performed discography.

Per Cohen, in the right patient, with the right IASP criteria for discogenic pain...discography HAS a role.
 
Top Bottom