i am biased because of false advertising by dit. After listening to him for 10 min (immuno), i only noticed that the dit guy has problems reading off the fa (as others have complained about before dropping his course). If you consider those things that he says as "adding", i strongly recommend that you listen to dr. Raymond's lectures (kaplan) and compare the two

. I dont consider paraphrasing every 15th sentence as "adding". If dit would be proud of their product, they would put it up for evaluation before buying. Just like every other review company does.
Dit is 2x shorter than kaplan. Webprep goes for $1800 (including lecture notes and q-bank, i believe) and dit for $850. These are its only advantages. ... Unless you want someone to read the fa to you in the hope that it sticks to your brain. Well, it may work for some, but it does not work for me. It would serve all those unsure about dit better if those lauding dit would post their boards scores and what other resources they have done right next to advertising for dit. It would help if this is not their only post too (the one i am quoting fulfills this requirement only).
Once again, i am biased. I have a tendency to not believe those who misrepresent their credentials. And i believe that dit was made popular on this forum by their claims ofr a ridiculously high average (falsely stating a mean of 236 and median of 240 without mentioning that this is only for those that got back to them with their scores and that averaging this data in statistics and real world is wrong due to non-respondent bias and equals false advertising) and by fake accounts that were caught by the moderators that were recommending dit as the all-or-none solution for the boards.
👍