do most doctors join the AMA?

This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.

ronaldo23

The Truth
15+ Year Member
Joined
Jul 28, 2007
Messages
994
Reaction score
0
Points
51
  1. Medical Student
Advertisement - Members don't see this ad
what are advantages/disadvantages?
 
what are advantages/disadvantages?

The majority of physicians do NOT belong to the AMA.

The AMA protects physicians' collective (financial) interests but may not represent the best interest of the public and may not represent the best interests of physicians who believe that there are more important things than their own financial self-interest.

On the other hand, as a member, you can help influence AMA policy. There are also folks who enjoy "joining" and getting involved in club stuff, local medical association, state association, AMA, etc, going to annual meetings, serving in the house of delegates, traveling and seeing fellow members, etc. I have a friend who did this for about 10 years in a parallel organization for dentists & climbed the ladder to serving as president of the org for a one or two year term. It included some pretty nice parties, too, like a super bowl party at the Ritz, when it coincided with a delegates meeting.
 
:laugh:

Is that why I keep seeing those ******ed "47 million" ads to get free health care for poor people, while the NPs expand unchecked?

If the AMA gave a crap about our financial interests, I would join.

If you read the AMA News (you can get a free e-mail every week with free access to the stories online for 6 mos after publication, that's how I keep up with what they're thinkin' about) you'll see that the AMA froths at the mouth every time a state or a big box moves to expand "nurse in a box" which would, IMHO, go a long way to making access available to many of the 47 million who need episodic care for minor problems.
 
"Frothing at the mouth" in physician-directed publications is meaningless.

The AMA's failure to speak out publicly, actively branding physicians as providing superior care, is pathetic.

They do not represent me, and I would venture that many, if not most, younger physicians feel similarly.

AMA shills are quoted in the mainstream press every time time the topic comes up. Still, you are correct in stating that most physicians (and I know some twice your age who feel as you do about the AMA) do not believe that the AMA represents their viewpoint.
 
Top Bottom