- Joined
- Dec 28, 2005
- Messages
- 152
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 0
- Other Health Professions Student
bananaface said:Excess caloric intake is the culprit. It doesn't matter if it comes in the form of sugary soda or Special K.
Do Pixie Sticks cause obesity? 😛THP said:The problem is that cokes are so easy to suck down one after the other, that you can ingest calories at a very rapid rate.
Taus said:In the end it all comes down to calories in vs. calories out....simple as that....
jonathon said:What most people don't know is high fructose intake increases adipogenesis and shifts to lipogenesis. I'm not sold on the kcal theory that was posted above. There might be more to it. For example, there might have been a selection against a gene that has a function in fructose breakdown. This could cause a shift in how humans breakdown fructose and discard it after energy expenditure. A slower breakdown of fructose and lower exercise (leading to lower metabolism rates) can cause a slower breakdown of fructose and as a result there is a higher percentage of adipogenesis. Obesity was not as rapid as it is now 30 years ago when people still drank sodas. People did not have this obesity problem when they drank coffee in the 1500s.
BrettBatchelor said:Poor personal choices pertaining to drinking Cokes
The Cokes themselves don't do anything other than taste delicious.

THP said:This explanation does not make any sense. If you could clarify what you are trying to say it would be appreciated.
Still, unless the laws of physics have changed you cannot create something from nothing. If you expend more energy than you consume (in the form of chemical energy) it is impossible to gain weight - assuming your Na/water regulation and cardiac function is normal. It is possible to gain weight through edema.
30 years ago people got a lot more exercise, besides 30 years is not enough time for a gene to be selected in a population.
I hate to disagree...but there is absolutely no way that genetics have changed much in the past 30 or so years .....and thus cannot account for the tremendous recent surge in obesity. I do agree that some people have the genetics, metabolism, etc to stay thinner then the avg person....but there were just as many people like that 30 years ago and we are much fatter as a society today. The factors that you mention at the end of your post are the most likely causes. Portion size, easy access to cheap food quickly, technology leading to less manual labor/exercise, etc....it adds up...Law2Doc said:Though I also don't quite understand what he's saying either, it is becoming clear that a big component of obesity is genetics. Some people can drink 7 cokes a day and stay thin. Others can gain weight on 3. It is not simply caloric -- it is how your body uses those calories. Sure. if you consumed no more than you metabolized, you would remain constant. But the amount of fat, muscle in your body, and the levels of your hormones and other chemical factors determine how well you can store and/or burn the fat, and a lot of that is genetic, and not something one can realistically know or measure, other than by trial and error with a fork and a scale. There is also developing science in the genetics of hunger, suggesting that that drive toward becoming obese is at least partially genetically determined too.
I do question your statement as to whether folks got more exercise 30 years ago. The personal trainer, gym membership phenomenon seems to have taken off for some segments of society since those days. (I think your statement is true in respect to children, thanks to video games and TV.) More likely the free-refill, super size me, fast food gimmicks make it easier for those prone to obesity to splurge. Portion sizes are simply larger today than they were 30 years ago, and thanks to science, probably calorically more dense, for a pretty low price. But I don't think you could say soda alone is to blame.
Law2Doc said:Though I also don't quite understand what he's saying either, it is becoming clear that a big component of obesity is genetics. Some people can drink 7 cokes a day and stay thin. Others can gain weight on 3. It is not simply caloric -- it is how your body uses those calories. Sure. if you consumed no more than you metabolized, you would remain constant. But the amount of fat, muscle in your body, and the levels of your hormones and other chemical factors determine how well you can store and/or burn the fat, and a lot of that is genetic, and not something one can realistically know or measure, other than by trial and error with a fork and a scale. There is also developing science in the genetics of hunger, suggesting that that drive toward becoming obese is at least partially genetically determined too.
I do question your statement as to whether folks got more exercise 30 years ago. The personal trainer, gym membership phenomenon seems to have taken off for some segments of society since those days. (I think your statement is true in respect to children, thanks to video games and TV.) More likely the free-refill, super size me, fast food gimmicks make it easier for those prone to obesity to splurge. Portion sizes are simply larger today than they were 30 years ago, and thanks to science, probably calorically more dense, for a pretty low price. But I don't think you could say soda alone is to blame.
Taus said:I hate to disagree...but there is absolutely no way that genetics have changed much in the past 30 or so years .....and thus cannot account for the tremendous recent surge in obesity. I do agree that some people have the genetics, metabolism, etc to stay thinner then the avg person....but there were just as many people like that 30 years ago and we are much fatter as a society today. The factors that you mention at the end of your post are the most likely causes. Portion size, easy access to cheap food quickly, technology leading to less manual labor/exercise, etc....it adds up...
Moxxie said:I think it's odd that this study from last year hasn't been brought up yet (and if it has, blame my skim-reading):
http://www.webmd.com/content/article/107/108476.htm
Although I really think that this link has more to do with general eating habits - the people that gain weight while drinking diet soda could be those that say "give me a big mac, super-size fries and a DIET coke."
I admit that I drink quite a bit of diet soda - for the caffeine and taste. I avoid sodas with calories at almost all costs. If the choice is between a sugary drink and water, I'll take the water. I should probably drink just the water, not the diet soda at all (I need to lose some weight myself). But I don't delude myself that drinking diet soda will cause me to lose weight - I need to cut down calories overall and exercise more. But that's a whole other issue!
Moxxie said:I think it's odd that this study from last year hasn't been brought up yet (and if it has, blame my skim-reading):
http://www.webmd.com/content/article/107/108476.htm
Although I really think that this link has more to do with general eating habits - the people that gain weight while drinking diet soda could be those that say "give me a big mac, super-size fries and a DIET coke."
I admit that I drink quite a bit of diet soda - for the caffeine and taste. I avoid sodas with calories at almost all costs. If the choice is between a sugary drink and water, I'll take the water. I should probably drink just the water, not the diet soda at all (I need to lose some weight myself). But I don't delude myself that drinking diet soda will cause me to lose weight - I need to cut down calories overall and exercise more. But that's a whole other issue!
jonathon said:In one of my lectures today, there were two students who had sodas with them during class. Therefore, I was analyzing their behaviors during lecture (the lecture was boring and didn't learn anything new) and I was not surprised by their behavior. Here is what took place. The professor asked five questions during lecture where the two students participated in the answers. Of the five questions asked, one of the two students answered three questions. After answering the three questions the student (an overweight female) would take a drink of diet coke. I find this behavior interesting. The other 2 questions were answered by a male (an overweight male) that took drinks of mountain dew after answering the two questions. No other students that I noticed had drinks with them during lecture.
I'm betting on earth.THP said:Dude, what planet are you from?
jonathon said:Why does it matter?
bananaface said:I'm betting on earth.
Vox Animo said:off topic, but still:
88% of corn grown in this country is used to make high fructose corn syrup, the leading cause of childhood obesity.
jonathon said:I would like to know what people think about this issue. I have my own thoughts but want to get other views besides the literature.
Vox Animo said:off topic, but still:
88% of corn grown in this country is used to make high fructose corn syrup, the leading cause of childhood obesity.
gostudy said:and billions of dollars could be saved if people would just adhere to this simple formula.
SirTony76 said:Just out of curiosity, does anybody know anything about Gatorade? I quit drinking soda/pop/coke when I went to college but now I drink quite a bit of Gatorade.
2Bsure said:Over the past thirty-five years, meal and snack portions have constituted the biggest changes in diets. The average number of calories consumed during breakfasts and lunches has remained fairly constant. Moreover, the average number of calories consumed during dinners has actually fallen. Assuming they are eaten as meals, these facts would seem to eliminate large-portion meals as the culprits of obesity.
scpod said:30 years ago, there were 3 channels on the average TV, so you didn't spend a lot of time watching it (if you even had one). There were no remote controls, either. To change the channel you had to get up. There were no video games. Children played outside from dawn to dusk, except when they came inside to eat a non-microwaved meal. Playing games meant football or basketball-- something active-- not something you can sit in a chair and do. There were no snacks in the house, and only 3 meals a day. There were very few snack foods on the market. I was amazed the day that barbecued flavor potato chips first came out, but it was two years before I actually got to try one. If you missed a meal, you went hungry. There was no fast food; only in bigger cities did you have a McDonald's. We actually drove 90 miles one time to try a pizza restaurant. There was one in North Carolina and one in South Carolina. We drove to Charlotte. People didn't eat out, only on rare occassions. Every household didn't even have a car. People walked to a lot of their destinations. There was no need for a gym because people got plenty of excercise in their everyday activities. Quite simply, people expended a lot more calories 30 years ago than they took in.
megboo said:Hear, hear! Even 20 years ago when I was 10 we were locked out of the house in the summer (figuratively speaking) to play outside. My friends and I were all involved on swim teams, softball/baseball, and had our outside chores as well as nieghborhood friends with whom we played tag, caught lightning bugs, and explored everything with.
I lived in a small town of about 8000, and I live in another small town of about 6000. I don't see many younger kids out riding their bikes or playing tag, catch, or hide-n-seek. I DO hear about video games and TV a LOT, and see the TV as a babysitter with kids everyday.
It's unfortunate, but it's not the TV or video games or even the food that's at fault. Parents should take responsibility for what they allow their kids to watch, do, and eat. Sure, they may do it at their friend's house from time to time, but they spend the majority of their life WITH THEIR PARENTS, who need to learn to say "NO!".
/rant 🙂
THP said:I agree with you but big part of the problem is mothers these days are so afraid that something might happen to little johnny that they don't let them do anything. My children are still too little to go out and do things, as they are just now learning to walk. But my wife is so afraid they are going to be kidnapped its amazing. She doesn't even like the idea of sending the kids to pick out a list of grocery items from the shelf while we are at the grocery store. She thinks they are going to be kidnapped. I know my wife is not alone in this mentality. I don't know where all the paranoia has come from.
jonathon said:In one of my lectures today, there were two students who had sodas with them during class. Therefore, I was analyzing their behaviors during lecture (the lecture was boring and didn't learn anything new) and I was not surprised by their behavior. Here is what took place. The professor asked five questions during lecture where the two students participated in the answers. Of the five questions asked, one of the two students answered three questions. After answering the three questions the student (an overweight female) would take a drink of diet coke. I find this behavior interesting. The other 2 questions were answered by a male (an overweight male) that took drinks of mountain dew after answering the two questions. No other students that I noticed had drinks with them during lecture.
THP said:I agree with you but big part of the problem is mothers these days are so afraid that something might happen to little johnny that they don't let them do anything. My children are still too little to go out and do things, as they are just now learning to walk. But my wife is so afraid they are going to be kidnapped its amazing. She doesn't even like the idea of sending the kids to pick out a list of grocery items from the shelf while we are at the grocery store. She thinks they are going to be kidnapped. I know my wife is not alone in this mentality. I don't know where all the paranoia has come from.