I know, I should pat them on the back for answering a question totally unrelated to the one I asked.
What continues to amaze (and I'll go ahead and admit, somewhat amuse) me is that the same DO proponents who didn't understand the question in the first, second or third case, still fail to understand it.
I'm tempted to let this thread go on and on without input just to humor myself, but since I'm slightly more interested in the answer to my question I'll go ahead and spell it out. BTW, anyone who is capable of understanding and responding to this question is already well aware of what I'm about to describe, and those who aren't probably shouldn't have wasted my time with a response in the first place.
So, here we go. I'm very painfully aware of the limitations that will be imposed on me as a result of being a DO or carib grad. Wasting your time trying to convince me otherwise is not something I would suggest. And with that out of the way, let's get to the meat of my query:
You are a PREMED posting on a board asking senior medical students, residents and attendings for advice, and getting angry/amused/downright arrogant when these people take the time to respond and offer you advice that you don't want to hear. Perhaps not the best approach--just a thought.
What you, as a PREMED fail to recognize, is what all of these people with far more experience than you already know, (these same people you have accused of "wasting your time") that the question you asked and the advice you have received are not at all unrelated.
A DO grad has two options for surgery. Enter an allopathic surgery program that allows one to be ACGME board certified, or enter an osteopathic surgery program which only allows AOA board certification (and which, as I was informed by a headhunter I called today, is "next to totally worthless.") My question hinges on the degree of job hindrance a graduate of an osteopathic surgery program (particularly in California) is likely to face relative to a DO who graduated from an allopathic, ACGME-approved surgical residency program.
That is to say, has anyone here (and BTW, obviously DO students should feel free to not respond, since they are very unlikely to have the answer to this) had any direct or even indirect experience with problematic employment options upon graduation from a DO surgical residency program? The question is not whether there *is* or *will be* a problem ( unfortunately I already know the answer to that one); the question is how much of a problem is this going to be?
-uro
Thanks for the clarification, but that is one we already know. We (even the MDs among us) know the options for DOs, and the hardship FMG's are going to have when looking for a surgical residency.
The fact is, that your employment opportunites as a surgical attending is based first and foremost on your residency training, and your residency training options are based on where you went to medical school. So you can not, as much as you would obviously like to, separate the issues.
There are lots of post on here regarding the variable (and often lower) quality of AOA surgical residency training programs, and having worked with some I can say that they do not see the bredth of cases and higher acuity care that allopathic surgical residents will have the opportunity to care for. Compare the average PGY3 from an AOA program and the average PGY3 from an allo program, and I think generally the allo resident will have more broad training. (Yes, there are always exceptions) Although I am not a chairman or a chief of staff, I can tell you that in my experiences and what I have heard from surgical faculty, when given two applicants for a faculty position (i.e "a real job"), both DOs, one from an allopathic program and one from an AOA program, I think they will give preference to the allopatically trained grad. California as a whole is one of the most competitive areas of the county to break into, so I dare to extrapolate that the situation would be even more competitive there.
In a nutshell, if you do decide to do an AOA surgical residency, will you get a job? Yes. But you WILL be moderately to severely limited in terms of location, practice environment, etc. All the previous posters were trying to point out (which, ironically, is where YOU missed the point here, not them) is that you may not want to start putting limitations on your career as an attending this early in your educations (you're a PREMED, right?
🙄 ) You may decide that you like academics and want to work someplace other than a small AOA residency program. Or you may decide you love vascular surgery, and that you will have severely limited your chances at getting a fellowship having gone to an AOA program. We aren't missing your point, we just know that the question you ask is not as clear cut and simple as you think it is.
If you want to go DO then go osteopathic, then go for it. You'll get a job someday. If you want to go DO then allo residency, then go for it. You'll still get a job someday, but you may also get the fellowship you wanted and a more high paying position in a location/hospital you'd rather work in. If you want to go FMG, you may get an allo residency and if you do, you'll still get a job.
As far as "how much" of a problem Dr. Uro, DO is going to have on his interview in 2018 when he walks into the Department of Surgery at Kaiser Permanentae in CA for his job interview.....dude, c'mon. There IS no answer to that question. If I knew that answer (heck, if ANY of us knew this answer) I'd have no med school loans since my 1-900-PSYCHIC-MD hotline would have taken care of that. Rather than getting annoyed, take a deep breath, step back, realize you are not even in the starting gate of this long race you are about to start (one many of us are well underway if not finished) and admit that you have asked an unanswerable question. You/We can only make generalizations, and tell you how to avoid potential headaches in the future.
In another note, don't you want to do urology anyway? That's what I got based on your post on 1/3/2007 that says " Me uro. Uro want to do urology." Why not ask the Urology forum your questions?