In addition to the SDN search function, look into programs whose researchers are investigating attachment theory (not to be confused with attachment parenting, which is pop-psychology BS); Attachment theory based on Bowlby and Ainsworth. Fundamentally, learning about appropriate childhood bonding and healthy attachment behaviors gives you a good basis for understanding child maltreatment and exposure to childhood trauma.
Along with university programs that study attachment, you'll find those schools will often coalesce with psychodynamic theories and psychotherapy research too (although you don't need to do the psychotherapy research, but it often goes hand-in-hand with psychodynamics). However, make sure the program is not limited to just one school of thought, and incorporates behavioral approaches also. And if you do travel down that path, the best psychodynamic programs are integrated with not only psychodynamic theories but cognitive behavioral skills as well (because it will increase your longevity as a clinician).
Programs with child tracks are excellent also, but it may be too soon to know if you want to be a child psychologist, so being exposed to all aspects of training is beneficial (i.e., early childhood, adolescence, emerging adults, adults, late adults, families, couples). Then you can decide what is right for you, as all can fit in with adverse childhood exposure and childhood maltreatment.
I work with adults now, but the majority of my caseload is with adult survivors of childhood trauma. As you may know, there is an ACE instrument developed for understanding pathology in adults (I'm sure you've looked into the seminal article introducing its main study. If not, here it is:
http://www.ajpmonline.org/article/S0749-3797(98)00017-8/pdf). So, it's a useful research tool in conceptualizing both childhood maltreatment and subsequent adult dysfunction (of course, used in conjunction with and in addition to other measures and assessments).
Good luck!
