D
deleted642280
Question for the attending pathologists in the forum. Do any of you have supplementary malpractice insurance, or do you feel your hospitals/practices cover you sufficiently? What do you recommend?
If you are signing out risky medicolegal cases - derm and breast come to mind as the most frequently litigated in my experience - I highly recommend.
Still have to do NON-GYNTwo of the top 5 things paths are sued for are cytopath. You could always just quit doing cytopath.
Most nongyn are a waste of time anyways. Give it some ambiguous diagnosis and recommend collecting a specimen you can actually get a real diagnosis off of. People in cytopath need to imagine that was their family member and quit overselling the field. It is a nearly useless field.
Most nongyn are a waste of time anyways. Give it some ambiguous diagnosis and recommend collecting a specimen you can actually get a real diagnosis off of. People in cytopath need to imagine that was their family member and quit overselling the field. It is a nearly useless field.
Can't believe it but i agree with you about some NON GYNSI don’t do cytology but you don’t think Thyroid assessments are useful? We have a large dept. with several Cytopathologists seeing patients in the FNA clinic and I always thought there is utility in this...
Is this really a thing ? - supplemental malpractice on top of the 1M/3M we all basically carry
I am aware of the details of many litigated cases b/c of being in practice a bit and by being in charge of credentialling pathologists. In every case I am aware of I don’t know anyone who lost personal assets as a result.
My experience most litigated:
Missed cervical glandular (not endometrial) lesions on Pap smear. They can be sneaky and I do believe progress faster than HSIL/Squamous Cancer. Many HSILs are missed too but when eventually discovered patient has usually not progressed thus no impact from delay and path/lab off the hook. Also missed Paps are almost never litigated if the negative Pap was not referred to pathologist. Treated more like a false negative CP test with known inherent FN rate.
Believe it or not decedent affairs is high on list. Improper consent on autopsy, diening leaves visible mark, deceased remains not handled as per family’s wishes based on religious view, etc
Happens more than you think...we all talk about the mis diagnosed sarcoma or pap or whatever but if you happen to be the chief and your system accidentally disposes of a first trimester fetal remains that the family wanted back your ass is getting sued just as fast.Who the hell is still doing autopsies other than coroner/MEs??
Stop. Just stop. Having families sue you over an autopsy worse than shoveling the snow in your neighbor's yard and then having them shoot you for the favor.
Man I hate people. Humanity is fleshy tide of destruction. Millions of zombies just slowing plodding until they get their next dose of Oxy. Disgusting. I wish was a dermatologist to the wealthy now because so few people out there actually deserve good healthcare. Im literally praying for an apocalyptic tomorrow so I can stop working and just get right to it.
but if you happen to be the chief and your system accidentally disposes of a first trimester fetal remains that the family wanted back your ass is getting sued just as fast.
I am for extra income.It helps that my wife is a PA.Forced to do it by decreasing surgical pathology reimbursements and PITIFUL COMPENSATION FOR BEING THE LABORATORY MEDICAL DIRECTOR.Who the hell is still doing autopsies other than coroner/MEs??
Stop. Just stop. Having families sue you over an autopsy worse than shoveling the snow in your neighbor's yard and then having them shoot you for the favor.
Man I hate people. Humanity is fleshy tide of destruction. Millions of zombies just slowing plodding until they get their next dose of Oxy. Disgusting. I wish was a dermatologist to the wealthy now because so few people out there actually deserve good healthcare. Im literally praying for an apocalyptic tomorrow so I can stop working and just get right to it.