- Joined
- Nov 11, 2012
- Messages
- 2,363
- Reaction score
- 1,642
- Points
- 5,726
- Attending Physician
We still use particulate for TF. Only do about 1% of my ESI via TF route.
Maybe not 1%, but its rare in my practice. I offer it when appropriate and failed ILESI.
The thing is practically any patient who has failed an ILESI is automatically a candidate for TFESI.
Unless you cure all your patients via ILESI (injecting medical weed, or something????), you should do more than 1% TFESI.
At least 20% of my patient candidates for injections are post surgical, so I do a lot more TFESIMaybe not 1%, but its rare in my practice. I offer it when appropriate and failed ILESI.
Or start TFESI and change to ILESI if they fail. 25g vs 17-20G
I Agee with the TFESI being used more...most of my patients have had some kind of spine surgery. Also I find it helps more if symptoms are unilateral or IESI fails ( many times already tried before they come to me)Or start TFESI and change to ILESI if they fail. 25g vs 17-20G
100% dex for TFESI.
1 in 100000? 1 in 1000000? Risk is miniscule. Elective procedure. Zero risk with nonparticulate in Lspine, needle alone can do the deed in the neck.
These are elective procedures. Everybody walks home.
Any consensus on which non- particulate?
Agree.Agree with deac. Recent cuts were unfair and I do every injection, including peripheral joints/nerve blocks under guidance. I do draw the line at US for TPI, just like deac.
being that you dont take medicaid and see few medicare patients, how long before you noticed a change in reimbursement from the private insurance companies?Agree with deac. Recent cuts were unfair and I do every injection, including peripheral joints/nerve blocks under guidance. I do draw the line at US for TPI, just like deac.
Why are you always on this board implying that private practice docs see "few medicare" patients? Some of us see tons of Medicare. My practice is in an area with an elderly population and I see 70% medicare. So to paint with a broad brush and say private practice isn't affected by draconian cuts in Medicare reimbursement is totally misleading.being that you dont take medicaid and see few medicare patients, how long before you noticed a change in reimbursement from the private insurance companies?
i dont have recent data. last is have data for, March, there had been no change in the amount received for LESI from the 2 main private insurances in my area (fyi, this HOPD bills private insurance under office based rates).
besides Dr. Lobel, it doesnt appear that the majority of posters on this board see medicare. a short survey of the private practices in my area reveals that fully 80% see no medicaid and rare (charity amount of) medicare.
if you are biatching about medicare cutting reimbursements, the advantage as i see it from a PP model is that if you think medicare is screwing you over... stop seeing them.
Why are you always on this board implying that private practice docs see "few medicare" patients? Some of us see tons of Medicare. My practice is in an area with an elderly population and I see 70% medicare. So to paint with a broad brush and say private practice isn't affected by draconian cuts in Medicare reimbursement is totally misleading.