- Joined
- Apr 28, 2020
- Messages
- 3,581
- Reaction score
- 2,637
- Points
- 3,351
- Attending Physician
Advertisement - Members don't see this ad
Maybe this would be a better fit for Confidential Consult. Mods, please redirect this thread if there is a better place for it, but I'm not asking for myself or for a friend; just out of genuine curiosity.
The AAMC's "reasonable accomodations" clause details very specific guidelines which qualify someone as "disabled" and therefore outside the realm of reasonable accomodations. In other words, there are very specific standards that students must meet in order to be able to auscultate, palpate, examine patients, etc.
Do you think autism qualifies as a "disability," and therefore should count as "discrimination?" Do you think we should have quotas for a certain number of autistic kids in each matriculating class?
My gut instinct is that bedside manner is of increasing importance in our hyper-litigious culture, and that a quota is not a good idea for many other reasons, including the AAMC's core competencies that were developed in 2015. But I want to know what other people think.
The AAMC's "reasonable accomodations" clause details very specific guidelines which qualify someone as "disabled" and therefore outside the realm of reasonable accomodations. In other words, there are very specific standards that students must meet in order to be able to auscultate, palpate, examine patients, etc.
Do you think autism qualifies as a "disability," and therefore should count as "discrimination?" Do you think we should have quotas for a certain number of autistic kids in each matriculating class?
My gut instinct is that bedside manner is of increasing importance in our hyper-litigious culture, and that a quota is not a good idea for many other reasons, including the AAMC's core competencies that were developed in 2015. But I want to know what other people think.

