I think loveoforganic is right, but I still think it's pretty unfair. Growing up, my life was no easy. My dad left the country with a legacy of $300,000 debt, and mom made under $30,000 a year supporting four of us. She got a settlement from her parents' estate that went straight to the IRS my senior year of high school. She and I had saved up exactly $8400 that paid for most of my first semester. Since we were considered "upper class" that year, I had to drop out.
After that, we were hit by another financial crisis when my brother was hospitalized for nearly a year. We had no health insurance. Our combined salaries barely kept us afloat. Once my brother was home, I found a more lucrative job and moved on my own to the city. I've been supporting myself on livable but crappy wages, and finally threw caution to the wind and started school full-time to pursue medicine. The only financial support I have received was from my aunt, who kindly pays my cell phone bill. Other than that, I have supported myself while being in school full-time.
I think URM status has a purpose, but it's not fair that non-URM economically disadvantaged people are not granted a similar status. I'm not crying for support, but it does seem unfair that those of us who were caught in precarious situations due to the mistakes of our parents are not at the very least granted a second look, when URM kids whose parents did a fantastic job at providing for them and giving them guidance are considered special cases.
Oops. My statements will probably open a can of worms. I stand by this, though. Disadvantaged is disadvantaged.