- Joined
- Jun 25, 2004
- Messages
- 1,758
- Reaction score
- 23
If you want to go into a top speciality like radiology or surgery for example, and you wanted to maximize your chances of getting into these positions.
Would it be beneficial to go to a top tier med school accrue lots of debt and supposedly have a better chance of getting the residency? Or is it better to go to the state school and save a lot of money but supposedly have it harder and be at the top of the class in order to get the residency.
I've been hearing conflicting stories but the general argument for the top tier med schools is that you're chances of getting a residency statistically are much better to get the residency of choice. However, does this take into fact how high-calibre the students whoa re at these top med schools and study very hard? Or is this just attributing the name of the med. school. Johns Hopkins for example, according to Princeton Review, has all or most of its students going into competitive spots even if the students are at the bottom of their med. class.
Like the undergraduate college to grad school scenario. It is true that it makes it much easier to get into a reputable grad school if you go to a top tier undergrad school. However it is also true that you can go to Bob Jones University in Alaska and still end up at a top tier med school although luck and extremely good stats would have to balance.
Now if the student went to their state med school, saving a lot of money, or a low tier med school (where statistically most of the students go into family practice, and very few get into top specialties), would this decrease their chances a lot (med school is hard wherever you go, but why the disparities in residencies?)
Would it be beneficial to go to a top tier med school accrue lots of debt and supposedly have a better chance of getting the residency? Or is it better to go to the state school and save a lot of money but supposedly have it harder and be at the top of the class in order to get the residency.
I've been hearing conflicting stories but the general argument for the top tier med schools is that you're chances of getting a residency statistically are much better to get the residency of choice. However, does this take into fact how high-calibre the students whoa re at these top med schools and study very hard? Or is this just attributing the name of the med. school. Johns Hopkins for example, according to Princeton Review, has all or most of its students going into competitive spots even if the students are at the bottom of their med. class.
Like the undergraduate college to grad school scenario. It is true that it makes it much easier to get into a reputable grad school if you go to a top tier undergrad school. However it is also true that you can go to Bob Jones University in Alaska and still end up at a top tier med school although luck and extremely good stats would have to balance.
Now if the student went to their state med school, saving a lot of money, or a low tier med school (where statistically most of the students go into family practice, and very few get into top specialties), would this decrease their chances a lot (med school is hard wherever you go, but why the disparities in residencies?)