- Joined
- Jul 22, 2010
- Messages
- 961
- Reaction score
- 4
Sources often draw the following as the best Lewis structure for SO2:
I'm wondering why this isn't drawn though:
Question:
Sulfur doesn't follow the octet rule, and the formal charges work out more favorably in the second structure. Looking at this example, it seems that fulfillment of the octet rule is more important than favorable distribution of formal charges even in cases where the central atom can fill its 3d orbitals with electrons and surpass an octet.
However, for some reason my instinct are telling me the opposite.
Is this a special case because the first Lewis structure actually has another resonance structure, so you can basically get electron delocalization (a more favorable distribution of charges) as well as fulfill the octet rule?
Normally, I would suspect that we would always try to find the Lewis structure with the most favorable formal charge distribution for central atoms that can go past the octet.
Am I correct?

I'm wondering why this isn't drawn though:
Question:
Sulfur doesn't follow the octet rule, and the formal charges work out more favorably in the second structure. Looking at this example, it seems that fulfillment of the octet rule is more important than favorable distribution of formal charges even in cases where the central atom can fill its 3d orbitals with electrons and surpass an octet.
However, for some reason my instinct are telling me the opposite.
Is this a special case because the first Lewis structure actually has another resonance structure, so you can basically get electron delocalization (a more favorable distribution of charges) as well as fulfill the octet rule?
Normally, I would suspect that we would always try to find the Lewis structure with the most favorable formal charge distribution for central atoms that can go past the octet.
Am I correct?