Does Step 2 score help after poor Step 1?

Discussion in 'Step I' started by DazedConfused, Apr 19, 2004.

  1. DazedConfused

    DazedConfused Junior Member

    Joined:
    Apr 12, 2004
    Messages:
    5
    Likes Received:
    0
    If you don't do so hot on Step 1, can a really good step 2 score supersede the step 1 score?
     
  2. Kalel

    Kalel Membership Revoked
    Removed

    Joined:
    Feb 1, 2004
    Messages:
    792
    Likes Received:
    3
    I wouldn't say "supersede", but I would say "help offset". That's why it's reccomended that you take it early if you did poorly on step I.
     
    Stop hovering to collapse... Click to collapse... Hover to expand... Click to expand...
  3. DazedConfused

    DazedConfused Junior Member

    Joined:
    Apr 12, 2004
    Messages:
    5
    Likes Received:
    0
    What is considered a great step 2 score? Is an applicant with a great step 2 score considered more competitive because of that? We all have heard that step 1 is often used to set cutoffs and to allow programs to get the applicants to a manageable number. Its probably the most important component as to making someone competitive on paper. I'm just curious where step 2 falls into the application evaluation process when determining who gets interviews and who is considered competitive, if it is used at all.

    Maybe the step 2 score gets utilized after the interview process when evaluating the applicant as a whole. Any thoughts or inside knowledge?
     

Share This Page