I thought tutoring would be a good EC for the coming school year, and it seems like something I will enjoy, but the gunner in me is saying research would be a better option as far as admissions go. Should I slap the gunner in me?
Can't do both? What kind of tutoring? (underprivileged kids, peer tutor...?)
Research may look more impressive to some schools...but overall, I think you should do what you would enjoy more...
Yes, it still counts. Teaching experiences such as tutoring are valid whether they're paid or volunteer. Provided you still have other volunteer experience, I see no reason why paid tutoring would be looked on any differently than uncompensated tutoring.Does paid chemistry tutoring with my college count as an EC? I love doing it, but I've heard that it doesn't help much.
If you enjoy tutoring, go ahead and do it. But it will do little or nothing for your med school apps.
If you enjoy tutoring, go ahead and do it. But it will do little or nothing for your med school apps.
I feel like tutoring is one of those things that is so common that almost every applicant does it. And, simply doing it doesn't tell the adcom anything about your ability to do it well...I can tutor all I want, maybe I never help a single tutoree, no one would know.
It certainly won't make you stand out that much unless you've just been doing crazy amounts of it or something else unusual.
but then again anyone can sign up to volunteer at a hospital, but it doesn't mean you are good at it.
At the same time, if you tutor formally as an employee of your campus education center or something you may have the opportunity to be evaluated by long-term pupils, which would give you some measure to reference as to your skill. The same thing would be true on a greater scale if one formally TA'd a class.The argument for tutoring that I was addressing was that it supposedly shows you're good at teaching peers etc etc which translates well in a career that incorporates lots of peer to peer teaching and education. However, tutoring doesn't at all mean you're good at teaching your peers, just that you got good grades in a class and thus you are allowed and encouraged to tutor others.
That's true but no one cares if you're good at it because mostly they know that you're handling files, wheeling patients around, filling up their water, carrying food trays, etc. Volunteering is worthwhile in and of itself because they aren't looking for you to display skill or proficiency, they're looking to see that you had clinical exposure and are willing to commit yourself to service.
The argument for tutoring that I was addressing was that it supposedly shows you're good at teaching peers etc etc which translates well in a career that incorporates lots of peer to peer teaching and education. However, tutoring doesn't at all mean you're good at teaching your peers, just that you got good grades in a class and thus you are allowed and encouraged to tutor others.
I feel like tutoring is one of those things that is so common that almost every applicant does it. And, simply doing it doesn't tell the adcom anything about your ability to do it well...I can tutor all I want, maybe I never help a single tutoree, no one would know.
It certainly won't make you stand out that much unless you've just been doing crazy amounts of it or something else unusual.
Is it even possible to TA a class as an undergraduate? Never heard or seen anyone do that at the two schools I've been at..
Is it even possible to TA a class as an undergraduate? Never heard or seen anyone do that at the two schools I've been at..
Wouldn't it depend on the size of your college? Every single TA for all my science courses have been graduate students; I haven't seen a single undergrad TA (for science courses at least) and I go to a fairly large public school.
I have over 100 hours volunteering in a hospital, so mow I'm now going to be tutoring adults to learn english for the next couple months for some non clinical volunteer experience.
At the same time, if you tutor formally as an employee of your campus education center or something you may have the opportunity to be evaluated by long-term pupils, which would give you some measure to reference as to your skill. The same thing would be true on a greater scale if one formally TA'd a class.
I can see that argument for private tutoring where there is no one to make sure you are doing your job, but what if you are doing it under an organization? I would hope that would count for something. Being a tutor in the tutoring center where you have a boss that can fire you for not being an adequate tutor or a organization that tracks the progress of the people being tutored to make sure someone is actually learning. I feel like you can use that argument for anything say, I spend an entire summer doing research, but I just ended up washing dishes most of the time.
I was thinking mainly about something like this (something my institution does as well):Whether or not this occurs, when would it ever make its way to an adcom? Short of you being removed, there's little way they will distinguish the tutoring/educating abilities of an applicant unless it becomes an explicit focus in their application. I do formally tutor for my campus education center and I'm evaluated by every pupil and etc but I honestly could do a crappy job and my tutoree won't really know the difference most of the times, they just want someone to help them.
NickNaylor's MDApps Blog said:2) Supplemental Instruction (SI) Leader:
SI leaders serve as facilitators for group study sessions in classes that are traditionally difficult. Leaders must attend all class lectures, create original teaching materials, and lead at least two sessions per week; students who regularly attend my sessions complete the course with a course GPA 0.5-1.0 points higher than non-attendees despite lower standardized test scores. I also frequently meet with individuals outside of the scheduled sessions to answer more specific and individualized questions, a significant commitment beyond the stated responsibilities of the position. I am responsible for about 300 students in the fall and 100 in the spring.
In addition to performing these functions, I also strive to be a mentor to younger students, especially freshmen, who are often anxious about finally embarking on their collegiate experience. Whether it be offering advice on professors, courses to take, or the pre-med process in general - a popular topic - I try to make myself as useful as possible to those I interact with, especially with respect to topics other than chemistry
Tutoring =/= being able to teach others well. I've known plenty of people who "tutored" in order to boost their CV, but can't actually teach to save their lives (anecdotes, I know...). Hell, the vast majority of PhDs/PIs that I know, who've had to TA classes, etc, can't teach well if their life depended on it.yea you are totally right. Having the ability to teach well to others has nothing to do with medical or patient education....... 👎thumbdown👎thumbdown👎
I would actually argue that if you're heavily involved in research (ie. you're not just running experiments for others), you're involved in a fair bit of teaching as well. I personally would put research above all the other things you listed since conducting independent research includes research (duh!), teaching, and leadership (since you'll likely be the go-to guy regarding that topic in the lab...at least, based on my experience), but I'm completely biased since I'm interested in an academic career. So take that with a grain of salt! 🙂While I agree that tutoring experiences may not be vetted for the most part, I think it's still a worthwhile EC. Yes, lots of people do it, but lots of people also volunteer at hospitals. Ideally the OP could tutor AND do research.
In my mind clinical experience > research > teaching/TA > tutoring > leadership > unique but unrelated EC's
Besides, tutoring is pretty fun, and if you realize that you really hate working with people...well...best to figure that out ASAP.