i took it.
cotinara said:math is normally an easy process for me if i had a CALCULATOR!!! but yah, it was tough. there was a few trig questions and they were simple. for me it was the time factor.
cotinara said:So I took the darn thing today and didn't do as well as I thought or wanted to.
PAT 18
RC 19
QR 14
BIO 19
GC 17
OC 21
TS 19
AA 18
UrG! It is very frusturating because the 3 kaplan tests I took prior to the exam I was getting above a 20 on all sections (except for math b/c i just suck at it) But honestly both of my TS/AA on those tests were 23-24.
When I got there I had a miny panic attack and my hands were erratic. It got worse when I started the test b/c literally the first 10 questions on bio were things I never even crossed studying! stuff to do with what is a cardiac output, what occurs when 2 cell embroyo has something done to it, and more heart stuff. not cool.After that I thought and felt that i got a 15 on my science section. I was really surprised with my RC and PAT. b/c those are my stongest points and well they weren't here. I had asteroids, brain scan techniques, and glutamate receptor stuff. I was dissappointed with PAT mostly with the paper folding which should have been the easiest section but the holes were all over the place and didn't match up.
The worst part is doing worse than the practice tests. Now everyone asks this and i will too. besides the 14 are these decent or should i truly contemplate retaking the thing to get higher scores?
p.s. While Kaplan is a good base, I really think it would be to the studiers best advantage to get outsource another book. Kaplan covers the bair minimum. just my 2cents