- Joined
- Jun 6, 2002
- Messages
- 14,029
- Reaction score
- 4,698
I'm a big fan of the i-Gels.
One of my paramedics sent me the pic of French SAMU doing ECMO in their subway system. Not a chance in Hades will that occur in my system during my lifetime.
One of my colleagues works part time at an academic center in SLC. He says they are doing in-hospital ECMO on their cardiac arrest patients who get brought in. Great idea in theory.....if you are at an academic center where you see 1 pt/hour and have residents to do all the scut work. Not a chance in hell this would every fly at any community place.
Is physician EMS a thing in other developes countries?This SHOULD be the standard though. If you've even seen this orchestration between EM/Vascular/Cardiology it's a thing of beauty. Outcomes are way better. It's sad - especially in a country where we pretend we're the best at everything - that your outcome can be hugely dependent on whether you present to an academic center that is cutting edge vs some ****ty community hospital.
Can you imagine if we had physician EMS and were able to crash people onto ECMO in the field? Out of hospital cardiac arrest would be forever changed.
I recall hearing about something in Italy, but this may have been 15 years ago. If you called the 911 equivalent number and said you had chest pain, they rolled this Winnebago with 3 paramedics and a cardiologist. However, I don't recall what they actually did on their (nearly literal) bus.
As long as a second patient does not have OHCA in the next 2-3 hours or so. Which will always happen.Can you imagine if we had physician EMS and were able to crash people onto ECMO in the field? Out of hospital cardiac arrest would be forever changed.
In Europe mainly. Most other countries, no.
As long as a second patient does not have OHCA in the next 2-3 hours or so. Which will always happen.
ECMO is great for a lot of things. The data from the Swiss using it for hypothermia is great. Those photos in the Louvre are inspiring.
Still not going to happen any more than you or I are going to the moon.
Yeah, but those reasons still exist in all of the other developed countries as well. It's not like the US is that far behind the ball here.Agree. Point is, things could be different, but aren't, beacuse "reasons"....mainly, money.
Sent from my Pixel 3 using SDN mobile
Yeah, but those reasons still exist in all of the other developed countries as well. It's not like the US is that far behind the ball here.
I mean, we have plenty of places where the EMS is still volunteer. If people won't pay for their ambulance driver, they're not going to pay for $200,000 of machinery for one patient.
Truth.
Hell, there are towns that voted to abolish their fire brigades because they thought that having paid firefighters was a waste of taxpayer money. The fire folks just charged everyone subscriptions and if you didnt subscribe and your house caught fire, they let your house burn to the ground.
Truth.
Hell, there are towns that voted to abolish their fire brigades because they thought that having paid firefighters was a waste of taxpayer money. The fire folks just charged everyone subscriptions and if you didnt subscribe and your house caught fire, they let your house burn to the ground.
As long as a second patient does not have OHCA in the next 2-3 hours or so. Which will always happen.
ECMO is great for a lot of things. The data from the Swiss using it for hypothermia is great. Those photos in the Louvre are inspiring.
Still not going to happen any more than you or I are going to the moon.
Can you imagine if we had physician EMS and were able to crash people onto ECMO in the field? Out of hospital cardiac arrest would be forever changed.
Yeah, but those reasons still exist in all of the other developed countries as well. It's not like the US is that far behind the ball here.
I mean, we have plenty of places where the EMS is still volunteer. If people won't pay for their ambulance driver, they're not going to pay for $200,000 of machinery for one patient.
Really? You have data that out-of-hospital ECMO improves survival?
Probably the same as the stay-and-play approach with trauma improves survival. Princess Di can attest to it.
There is no data that out-of-hospital ECMO improves survival or neurologic outcomes in out of hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA). In fact, overall outcomes for survival or neurologic recovery are almost identical for OHCA regardless of whether or not ECMO is used (2-11% depending on the region). On the other hand, IHCA seems to do better with ECMO at high-volume centers with duration of low-flow time (CPR) being a major determinant of outcome. Europe is trying to reduce that low-flow time with field cannulation, but we are at least 5 years away from knowing if this theory is sound.
One of my colleagues works part time at an academic center in SLC. He says they are doing in-hospital ECMO on their cardiac arrest patients who get brought in. Great idea in theory.....if you are at an academic center where you see 1 pt/hour and have residents to do all the scut work. Not a chance in hell this would every fly at any community place.
Definitely not financially sound, and the cost per life saved is not feasible.
Spray water on the contracted one. (Not joking)I've heard of this and always wondered what they would do with a burning, uncontracted building that's close enough to a contracted one to potentially spread the fire.
That's fire protection: 1. life safety 2. prevention of fire spread 3. fire suppression. That's the priority order.Spray water on the contracted one. (Not joking)
Well, the US is, physically, REALLY large. For example, it has been said that the Buffalo Fire Department has saved the city, because Buffalo is, essentially, wood. That is unlike Denver, which is brick. Scottsdale, AZ is a place that is like you describe. That is where Rural/Metro was started in 1948. They get just about no fires.Ask any firefighter. Fires today are not your fires from yesteryear.
If you have a fire, you want your house to burn down. You want a complete rebuild, not an attempt at salvage. It simply doesn't work.
Also, fires today are exceedingly less common than they were even 30 years ago. New building codes, new concepts (shut your doors at night people). People live, and whole blocks aren't burning.
Fire based EMS is a dinosaur trying to save themselves as civil servants.
ThisYou miss the point. It's not esophageal intubation that's the problem. It's missed esophageal intubation that's the problem.
Nobody faults the EMT's (EMT-cardiacs as they're designated) for gut tubing. They fault them for not recognizing it and pulling it before life-ending damage occurs.
If my medics had 0.5% unrecognized esophageal intubations, they would not intubate.
Ask any firefighter. Fires today are not your fires from yesteryear.
On another note, the 51% may be more representative of EMS around the country than my system. I exert a lot of control over airway management in my system. They are required to attend annual training to keep their skills up to date since many of them go a long time without intubating a real patient
An RT was the one that physically intubated the kid. However, it's on the entire crew in the back to make sure as hell that tube is properly seated.There are two different scenarios with field intubations that scare me to different degrees. The first is paramedics intubating patients in cardiac arrest. This is lesser of two evils to me as it involves an already dead patient, and the paramedics insuring that they stay dead if they miss an esophageal intubation. This is bad, but nowhere near as bad as the second scenario that I’ve seen - missed esophageal intubation after attempted field RSI. Here you have an alive patient, many times who would do OK with diligent BLS airway maneuvers, who is effectively killed by a missed intubation. Read this article if you want to see a horror story of missed esophageal intubation:
This kid hit his head while skateboarding in my parent’s neighborhood. He was taken to a small hospital with injuries that amounted to nothing more than a post-concussive syndrome with a negative head CT. The local hospital decided to intubate him for “airway protection” because an ambulance would need to drive him an 90 min up the road to ECU. Along the way, he self-extubates and the ambulance crew pulls over on the side of the road to RSI him with predictable results. Keep in mind that the kid had no injuries to warrant intubation in the first place...
Why did you give her rocuronium?They did an esophageal intubation on a 44 yo female patient of mine last week. Luckily she was still awake enough to keep her O2 sat at 90%. She was too agitated to check the tube. Figured it out when her O2 sat dropped to 40% after giving her some ROC. Luckily she survived.
She was agitated and not responding to sedation. Clearly because she had a big piece of plastic in her esophagus and was suffocating. There was no way to check the tube either without paralyzing her.Why did you give her rocuronium?
Waveform capnography?She was agitated and not responding to sedation. Clearly because she had a big piece of plastic in her esophagus and was suffocating. There was no way to check the tube either without paralyzing her.
Waveform capnography?
Are you honestly telling me you don't have waveform cap at your critical access hospital? Or even a less effective colorimetric cap? I've never worked in a critical access hospital, but that just seems needlessly unsafe.Critical access hospital, and was getting ready to transfer her out. But good thought!
Are you honestly telling me you don't have waveform cap at your critical access hospital? Or even a less effective colorimetric cap? I've never worked in a critical access hospital, but that just seems needlessly unsafe.
Will say that even at my big academic affiliated community place the concept of putting intubated patients on etco2 just doesn’t click. I ask for it twenty times and the someone just tells me the spo2 looks fine.
They have the colorimetric etco2 no problem though.
I'm a medic and this is currently a controversial topic in my area. How "saturated" with paramedics is your system? How many tubes on average is each provider getting in a year? Has that 99% been strictly with video laryngoscopy? Are they getting OR time or just annual competency checks using mannequins?
Will say that even at my big academic affiliated community place the concept of putting intubated patients on etco2 just doesn’t click. I ask for it twenty times and the someone just tells me the spo2 looks fine.
They have the colorimetric etco2 no problem though.
I have worked a non-critical access (35k/yr) ED that did not have waveform capnography. The ultrasound only had a functioning linear probe (cardiac and curvilinear were broken) and the peds airway cart didn't have a functioning laryngoscope, no supraglottic airways, nor a surgical airway.Are you honestly telling me you don't have waveform cap at your critical access hospital? Or even a less effective colorimetric cap? I've never worked in a critical access hospital, but that just seems needlessly unsafe.
It's honestly so weird. I've had them try to take the waveform monitor off in order to "confirm color change" with it. When I try to tell them it's a moot point: dead horse eyes.Sometimes you have to just do it yourself. Same at my critical access hospital. The RTs don't get it, they still reach for the colorimetric detector, which I don't want.