Doximity GPT ?

[DrMetal]

Doximity

You guys ever use Doximity's GPT? It's actually pretty good. You can prompt, "Write a Discharge Summary base on:" (paste your last progress note) . . . and it actually spits out something decent?! Scary.

---

Members don't see this ad.

 

[RainerMaria]

I've done Letter for medical necessity for NGS testing when it was denied, and produces something long enough to look like an angry clinician took the time to review the data supporting it and write several paragraphs. That said it had a lot of [Patient's Name] and [Patient's Insurance] things that I had to manually go and edit. It would be nicer if this stuff was baked into EPIC. I already have too may dang tabs open

 

[DrMetal]

That said it had a lot of [Patient's Name] and [Patient's Insurance]

So in your prompt, if you tell it to use the Patient's name, or insurance . . .it'll do that. The more specific you are with your prompt, the closer the product to what you desire.

This is the end of us!

 

[DrMetal]

 

[Crayola227]

View attachment 400454

Wow this is great. I need to update my site sig anyway

 

[end stage fibro]

Doximity

You guys ever use Doximity's GPT? It's actually pretty good. You can prompt, "Write a Discharge Summary base on:" (paste your last progress note) . . . and it actually spits out something decent?! Scary.

i wrote on this forum a while ago about GPTs taking care of DC summaries and notes. the current available tech is way better than I imagined. everyone is up in arms about radiology being at risk because of AI...what about us? the residents i occasionally supervise have blind faith in OpenEvidence, they cant even tell when it is hallucinating. I am in a Nuance DAX pilot for my institution...DAX is a better documenter than most of our PrOvIDeRs. I heard uptodate is going to have a chat bot interface soon too...if you can get trusted info from a simple question, where is our moat to prevent encroachment?I can see us moving to an anesthesia model...1 attending 4 NPs over like 60 patients.

I do some medical necessity consulting as well. Even our small shop is experimenting with using GPTs to help with appeals. Not to farm out the GPT to the highest bidder, but so that I can write appeals way faster at a cheaper price. If it ends up working out, you bet i am going to take jobs like a madman because that cash cow will milk itself dry.

 

[DrMetal]

i wrote on this forum a while ago about GPTs taking care of DC summaries and notes. the current available tech is way better than I imagined. everyone is up in arms about radiology being at risk because of AI...what about us? the residents i occasionally supervise have blind faith in OpenEvidence, they cant even tell when it is hallucinating. I am in a Nuance DAX pilot for my institution...DAX is a better documenter than most of our PrOvIDeRs. I heard uptodate is going to have a chat bot interface soon too...if you can get trusted info from a simple question, where is our moat to prevent encroachment?I can see us moving to an anesthesia model...1 attending 4 NPs over like 60 patients.

I do some medical necessity consulting as well. Even our small shop is experimenting with using GPTs to help with appeals. Not to farm out the GPT to the highest bidder, but so that I can write appeals way faster at a cheaper price. If it ends up working out, you bet i am going to take jobs like a madman because that cash cow will milk itself dry.

What a world huh? The clock is definitely ticking on this profession. If a typical hospitalist carries say 15 patients per day, so (with such AI tools) she'll be expected to carry 30, 45, maybe even 60. Why not? If you don't have to write anything, you can just round all day! Of course then, the typical hospitalist group will only need 5 physicians, instead of 20.

 

[erpmrri12]

I have a feeling that our clocks are ticking when I ask questions from MediSearch's GPT. Scary stuff