Drawing CRP for cardiac workup?

This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.

neuroride

Member
15+ Year Member
Joined
Jan 12, 2006
Messages
156
Reaction score
11
Anybody heard of or use C-reactive protein for cardiac workup before surgery? Had a new patient come in today for consult on my colorectal surgery rotation and tell the surgeon that she didn't have any heart problems but that her gyn/onc had drawn a CRP on her to get ready for surgery and that is was 5; she is apparently going to get further cardiac workup based on this.

I did a little searching and found some articles linking heart dz with elevated CRP but had never heard of someone getting it drawn outside of the normal following of infection/inflammation.

Thoughts?

Members don't see this ad.
 
Members don't see this ad :)
Anybody heard of or use C-reactive protein for cardiac workup before surgery? Had a new patient come in today for consult on my colorectal surgery rotation and tell the surgeon that she didn't have any heart problems but that her gyn/onc had drawn a CRP on her to get ready for surgery and that is was 5; she is apparently going to get further cardiac workup based on this.

I did a little searching and found some articles linking heart dz with elevated CRP but had never heard of someone getting it drawn outside of the normal following of infection/inflammation.

Thoughts?

I think the OB/GYN part of the story answers the whole thing. CRP is an acute phase reactant, and as I recall increased levels are associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular dz along with a MILLION other things...and has specificity for pretty much nothing. And just the fact that the pt is being worked up for surgery tells me he's likely to have an underlying process that might increase his CRP to begin with.
 
CPR is a maker for inflammation, it has been studied as a prognostic factor in acute MI and in chronic coronary disease.
The reasoning behind this is that the more inflammation you have at the level of the coronary circulation the worse your outcome.

Results in these settings are apparently positive (last i've heard it could well have changed).

However it has no use in an asymptomatic person as a cardiac marker and in this case could be elevated for any reason.
 
The idea of utilizing CRP in the early triage of individuals with potential cardiovascular disease was advanced in 2003 by AHA/ CDC with the publication of the AHA/CDC Scientific Statement on Markers of Inflammation and Cardiovascular Disease.

The scientific statement (a consensus report derived from a weekend conference (actually a Thursday and Friday) of "experts in the field") attempted to determine in what situations CRP testing could be valuable in prognosticating cardiovascular risk.

The recommendation was that when a patient is found to be at intermediate risk for CAD based on the routine clinical risk factors of obesity, diabetes, smoking, hypertension etc, elevated CRP levels might tip the scales to more aggressive workup and treatment. Obviously in high risk individuals CRP is not useful since they warrant aggressive workup/ therapy anyway. In low risk individuals, the specificity is too low to be beneficial.

The AHA/CDC recommendations specify that two separate "high-specificity CRP" (hs-CRP) levels should be measured and averaged together. Levels less than 1 mg/L are considered "low," levels from 1 to 3 mg/L are considered "average," and levels greater than 3 mg/L are considered "high." People in the "high" group have about a two-fold increase in relative risk for cardiovascular disease compared to those in the low-risk group.

I am unaware of any modification to or refutation of this consensus statement to date.

The average Gyn may be more predisposed to measuring CRP levels given that the Women's Health Study demonstrated that women with elevated CRP levels had increased risk even if their cholesterol levels were normal.

So, if your patient has intermediate risk factors for cardiovascular disease, the elevated CRP might tip your scales to more aggressive preoperative workup. On the other hand, if she is a thin, fit woman with normal blood pressure, you might be concerned that her elevated CRP simply reflects an increased risk of badness and need for adjuvant chemo if she is in your clinic for colorectal Ca.

In the additional 128 stage II patients, CRP-positive patients showed a 3-year survival rate of only 55% without adjuvant chemotherapy, but this increased to 90% with adjuvant chemotherapy

Lots of info on CRP in colorectal cancer and cardiovascular disease and a whole host of other topics is just a click away Pubmed.

- pod
 
Last edited:
I think the new guidelines are to check a high sensitivity CRP as a more accurate marker of CV risk in a person who doesn't have obvious risk factors.
 
Top