I won't have an opportunity to work with gas for a few months. What goes into the 3:1, 4:1, etc model? Things I read on here are pretty vague.
What are you doing as the anesthesiologist? Do you start/finish the case? Pop in room-to-room to say hi? Monitor vitals from another room akin to tele?
Would you mind giving me the break down versus sitting your own case start to finish? Appreciate it.
@FFP or anyone else feel free to chime in.
There are 7 components to qualify for Medical Direction:
- Performs a pre-anesthetic examination and evaluation;
- Prescribes the anesthesia plan;
- Personally participates in the most demanding procedures in the anesthesia plan, including induction and emergence;
- Ensures that any procedures in the anesthesia plan that he or she does not perform are performed by a qualified anesthetist;
- Monitors the course of anesthesia administration at frequent intervals;
- Remains physically present and available for immediate diagnosis and treatment of emergencies; and
- Provides indicated-post-anesthesia care.
So, if I am running 3-4 rooms with CRNA's, I'm seeing a lot of patients that day. I see them all. Do the history and brief, focused PE. I'm there, in the room to start/induce all GA cases except for MAC's (like in eye rooms) where we do not claim Medical Direction, even though we fulfill most of the 7 steps of direction anyway (see all patient, and care for them in recovery etc)....
Notice that "induction and emergence" is stated. I'm often not there during "extubation" but will be for difficult patients. Patients often emerge from anesthesia at different points (may be in PACU if pulled deep, or if LMA is pulled while patient still has some level of MAC on board). This is different from extubation of an endotracheal tube. Otherwise, to start a case, I'm either pushing induction drugs while CRNA tubes, OR I will have them push drugs while I tube.
I make "rounds" (and this is where we can ALL improve, and is also where ACT models are "abused"). "Monitors the course of anesthesia administration at frequent intervals" is vague. But, the best docs in an ACT model will "round" on their rooms. This can always be improved upon.
I am in the process of putting a list together for all of our CRNA's (our employees) of when we expect a call/text for things going on in the room. Typically, this is implied (major hemodynamic issues requiring frequent pressor support etc. and is likely mostly doc/CRNA dependent). We will have a universal list for our practice that I will be making, however.
I could give a lecture on missed opportunities in anesthesia. But, doing an ACT model is imperfect, but arguably a very safe way to go as there is always back up.
There are also benefits to an ACT model from a clinical perspective (I do way more blocks than if I sat my own room. I do way more advanced airway stuff (prepping a patient for awake FOI while rare, requires time and focus), as well as drawbacks. I always look for ways to add value, which is critical. This can be done via multiple initiatives.
I am lucky in that we do sit our own rooms from time to time, and as I've said it is more personally rewarding for me hands down. Nothing is black and white however, and as stated, there is some non-financial upside to ACT-medical direction.
I hope this helps.