Dural puncture during SCS implant

This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.

fathead88

Full Member
7+ Year Member
Joined
May 16, 2015
Messages
76
Reaction score
94
Had my first SCS implant dural puncture during an implant today. Usual LOR with air, followed by placing the lead and noticing minimal resistance to advancement and then clear fluid coming out of the touhy. I accessed one level below and proceeded without any issue. My question is anyone have any tricks/tips for managing post dural puncture headaches in the post-SCS implant crowd? I see PDPH from IR or neurology and will offer blood patches but I am not excited to do that with a new stim.

Members don't see this ad.
 
Had my first SCS implant dural puncture during an implant today. Usual LOR with air, followed by placing the lead and noticing minimal resistance to advancement and then clear fluid coming out of the touhy. I accessed one level below and proceeded without any issue. My question is anyone have any tricks/tips for managing post dural puncture headaches in the post-SCS implant crowd? I see PDPH from IR or neurology and will offer blood patches but I am not excited to do that with a new stim.
Sphenopalatine block. Might have to repeat it a time or 2 but can avoid blood patch while awaiting spontaneous closure.

Here’s my favored technique.

 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
Really not a big deal. I’ve seen for dural punctures what’s 14 gauge to we needles during the course of training and in private practice. As crazy as it sounds, these were during trials and not implant and none of them developed headaches.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 users
Members don't see this ad :)
Sphenopalatine block. Might have to repeat it a time or 2 but can avoid blood patch while awaiting spontaneous closure.

Here’s my favored technique.

I did one with a regular q tip and 1% lidocaine, I applied it 3 times, each about 2 minutes apart. Stopped the headache. Weirdly it was a PDPH from a DRG stimulator trial and I never saw any fluid come back.
 
Really not a big deal. I’ve seen for dural punctures what’s 14 gauge to we needles during the course of training and in private practice. As crazy as it sounds, these were during trials and not implant and none of them developed headaches.
Post your SPGB video!
 
Probably won’t have a headache. The leads and blood in the epidural space from the implant process kinda create a self blood patch.
 
agree, most likely wont have headache. in addition to what bobbarker said, im assuming that your patient was a "typical" SCS patient - older, prior spine surgery. the most common patient to get a PDPH are younger patient with "native" spine.
 
if you've already punctured the dural and want to minimize the chances of getting a PDPH, the literature suggests a few things. ideally your bevel will be parallel and not perpendicular to the dural fibers as this decreases the chance of PDPH. Once you realize you've punctured the dura, inject some PFNS and re-stylet the needle before withdrawing it. These simples steps can decrease the chances of getting a PDPH
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 users
The key to preventing a PDPH:
Once you see the csf flow back you pull the needle back as quickly as possible and then look around the room to see if anyone else noticed.





😂
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Reactions: 13 users
Interesting, what's the mechanism of these steps?
Not entirely sure but after apparently getting a cervical PDPH I read like 5 papers on it and several mentioned these steps. I think the suggestion of re-styleting the needle has to do with the theory that the unstyletted needle could catch and further tear some of the dura on the way out
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 users
Members don't see this ad :)
Possible flushing saline and restyletting pushes the dural flap back into position?
 
I think dural headaches may not be as common as we think. CT myelo and ppl usually do fine. I did them in fellowship and I don't recall them routinely causing problems.
 
The two (known) wet taps I have had were in young people (30's) and I blame the resident since they actually did it....(18 gauge Tuohy, so no joke - a headache is coming!)

But anyway, on both, I put saline into the intrathecal space -

Then FLOODED them with fluid afterward....like 3 liters.

One got a mild headache that was tolereted well with OTC meds, and the other didn't get a headache. It made me a believer of the intrathecal saline. But putting 10ml in made me very nervous both times. I don't know the correct or safe volume - but 10ml seems like a lot. That is something like 8% of the total CSF volume.

How much contrast is injected with myelograms?
 
I think all the advice applies to Quicke and not Tuohy.
I would think the curved shape of a touhy bevel would be more like to catch some of the dura on the way out over a quinke. A sprotte might too
 
Possible flushing saline and restyletting pushes the dural flap back into position?
As I remember as an anesthesia resident - flushing saline does not help, and there is low quality evidence that restyletting might help. I thought the parallel-perpendicular debate was squashed when it was determined that they both caused equal rates of PDPH, despite what some of the scanning electron microscopy images showed during those simulated injuries.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
If you're not occasionally wet tapping SCS patients you are not doing enough cases. Scoliosis, stenotic segments, 85 year old patients, LF as thick as beef jerky...Bob is correct.

Remember the ABC's of surgery...accuse, blame and criticize. Try to have a fall guy scrubbed in and don't trial 38 yo F smokers with a BMI of 22.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 users
Not entirely sure but after apparently getting a cervical PDPH I read like 5 papers on it and several mentioned these steps. I think the suggestion of re-styleting the needle has to do with the theory that the unstyletted needle could catch and further tear some of the dura on the way out
Had not looked at this previously but heard about the technique from older docs.

The largest RCT I'm seeing on the topic was supportive but limited effect size.
Qualifier here is that this was for a planned spinal and only used 5 mL.

It's a low cost intervention with minimal risk so I'd be okay with it if you've got clean PFNS. The worry I would have is for a chemical arachnoiditis so I have historically just pulled out.
 
I would think the curved shape of a touhy bevel would be more like to catch some of the dura on the way out over a quinke. A sprotte might too
im not so sure. the curve is on the outside surface and if you look at the superior surface, its pretty flat per se.

my guess on saline is that you increased intrathecal volume, and one of the main drivers of headache is the volume change due to the leak, not the actual tear.


i believe the thought on parallel bevel is that the trauma to the dura is more easier to seal, as it were, than if the needle is perpendicular, even though the amount of trauma is the same.

fortunately, the people most likely to get a severe PDPH are young parturients...
 
im not so sure. the curve is on the outside surface and if you look at the superior surface, its pretty flat per se.

my guess on saline is that you increased intrathecal volume, and one of the main drivers of headache is the volume change due to the leak, not the actual tear.


i believe the thought on parallel bevel is that the trauma to the dura is more easier to seal, as it were, than if the needle is perpendicular, even though the amount of trauma is the same.

fortunately, the people most likely to get a severe PDPH are young parturients...
Articles postulates parallel bevel separates dural fibers instead of cutting them when perpendicular

And as far as touhy vs quinke, the orientation and shape of the cutting edge makes it seem obvious that dura would be more likely to get caught on an unstyleted touhy vs a quinke during needle withdrawal
 
As I remember as an anesthesia resident - flushing saline does not help, and there is low quality evidence that restyletting might help. I thought the parallel-perpendicular debate was squashed when it was determined that they both caused equal rates of PDPH, despite what some of the scanning electron microscopy images showed during those simulated injuries.
Can you post an article? I did not know this idea was debunked (on needle orientation).
 
Articles postulates parallel bevel separates dural fibers instead of cutting them when perpendicular

And as far as touhy vs quinke, the orientation and shape of the cutting edge makes it seem obvious that dura would be more likely to get caught on an unstyleted touhy vs a quinke during needle withdrawal
i posted a study earlier that did electron microscopy and showed that parallel placement still cut dural fibers.

your second statement makes me think that one would be more likely to get a dural tear from a touhy than a quincke....

but what is it getting snagged on?

touhy.GIF
 
Ligamentum buckling maybe
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
i posted a study earlier that did electron microscopy and showed that parallel placement still cut dural fibers.

your second statement makes me think that one would be more likely to get a dural tear from a touhy than a quincke....

but what is it getting snagged on?

View attachment 375059
Yes what Mitch said. Perhaps frayed ligament fibers hanging down as the needle is pulled out. I’m talking specifically about minimizing tear while pulling the needle out and the theory of restyletting
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
Just to follow up, the patient did not get a PDPH despite a 14g needle dural puncture, probably as mentioned by others due to epidural bleeding and increased pressure from the SCS leads.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
Top