PhD/PsyD EBPs appropriate for a group format?

This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.
Joined
Jul 15, 2014
Messages
1,890
Reaction score
2,411
Hi folks,

Does anyone know the current state of the literature for group treatment for EBPs in say depression and anxiety? I've been asked to provide some group treatment while doing postdoc and I'm curious what's out there and effective. I don't want to just run a support group.

Thanks!

Members don't see this ad.
 
All I know is that there's some evidence CPT in group format is less effective than individual.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 users
Hi folks,

Does anyone know the current state of the literature for group treatment for EBPs in say depression and anxiety? I've been asked to provide some group treatment while doing postdoc and I'm curious what's out there and effective. I don't want to just run a support group.

Thanks!

As far as transdiagnostic groups, if I were in your position, I'd look into the unified protocol.

There's also mindfulness based cognitive therapy for depression, but that requires some advanced training to deliver effectively.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 users
Members don't see this ad :)
As far as transdiagnostic groups, if I were in your position, I'd look into the unified protocol.

There's also mindfulness based cognitive therapy for depression, but that requires some advanced training to deliver effectively.

Thank you! This is very helpful.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
Not off the top of my head, but an option between those two choices could be providing an education and skills group, structured a bit more like a class, where you cover some theory (CBT basics, cog distortions, bx activation, etc...) and apply it. I have seen this done several times in larger hospital settings with some anecdotal success for mild-moderate sx based on PHQ-9/GAD scores dropping.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 4 users
I’m going to throw a wrench in the UP idea. I don’t believe there is a single controlled study on UP in a groups setting. Is there? I’m not up on the literature for the past few years. I also don’t think there is much for UP in general vs active treatment.

There is a decent amount on other CBT treatments but you’d have to look at individual disorders. The one I think has the most research for heterogenous groups is DBT Skills training. This requires advanced training but there are numerous RCTs ranging from treatment resistant depression to ADHD to BPD.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 3 users
I don’t believe there is a single controlled study on UP in a groups setting. Is there?
Quick google turns this up:

There might be more, and I'm not sure of the quality of the study, but there's at least something out there.

If there's a hierarchy I'd put DBT skills groups at the top, as far as effectiveness and flexibility for transdiagnostic groups. I'm also not up on the literature, though. I do recall there being some pretty strong evidence for the effectiveness of DBT Skills groups alone for heterogeneous presenting problems, but don't have citations on hand. The one caveat I'd add is that I'd be wary of implementing skills groups in most settings. There is so much content that if people aren't going to be in the group for at least the first full 6 months then there's going to be a lot of holes and gaps in their skill building that could be problematic.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 users
Quick google turns this up:
That is just a protocol and not a completed/published study.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 users
It is good to check into the literature every once in a while. Glad this thread got me to check. Looking over this systematic review published in 2019:

I count 3 RCTs. Out of those 2 are vs waitlist controls and 1 is vs TAU. Despite all the UP talk, which I am in support of, there has been little stringent RCTs. I'd like to see at least one trial of UP vs an active treatment that is not TAU (e.g., psychodynamic, DBT, CT, peer support, drum circles). Maybe something more recent out there?
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 users
I do recall there being some pretty strong evidence for the effectiveness of DBT Skills groups alone for heterogeneous presenting problems, but don't have citations on hand. The one caveat I'd add is that I'd be wary of implementing skills groups in most settings. There is so much content that if people aren't going to be in the group for at least the first full 6 months then there's going to be a lot of holes and gaps in their skill building that could be problematic.
For those interested in DBT, this is a potentially useful resource

It is a few years old but provides a lot of citations.

For DBT skills, here are the RCTs (there are a few more since this was made)

As you can see most RCTs are mostly 3-4 month in length rather than 6 months (or 12 months in most RCTs of 4-mode DBT).
While each study concentrates on a single disorder/problem, there are at least 2 that are pretty heterogenous; Neacsiu et al., 2014 and Uliaszek et al., 2016.

I agree that there is a lot to learn and clinicians should apply strict policies on dropout. In DBT, 4-miss rule is commonly used (4 absences in a row means dropout) and I support a 3-miss rule for shorter group lengths.

The entire treatment is designed to be modular and the full assortment of skills has probably never been used. Even the most common skills are typically not all used in most of these RCTs. Finally, which skills to use should be driven by the problems faced by individuals receiving the treatment.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 users
Top