EK Bio vs. TPR Bio

[Esquire]

---

Members do not see this ad.

I have bio books from Exam Krackers and TPR course. The TPR book seems more detailed than the EK book. Is it too much detail?

Which book is preferable?

 

[typicalindian]

People have done well with both, read a little of both and pick the one that you like the best. You should be OK with whatever you end up choosing

 

[Erythropoietin]

both are fine, though EK is actually more detailed.

 

[Esquire]

EK and Princeton Review also contradict each other.

For example, EK says not to worry about enzyme kinetics (Vmax, Km, etc.), but Princeton Review has several questions about enzyme kinetics.

Hmm???

 

[deep122]

I prefer EK, as I found TPR to have too much detail, however the TPR book is still very good.

 

[411309]

If you have a weak bio background read EK bio 3-4 times cover to cover. Then dive into TPR. The section on genetics for TPR is really great, imo. The section on genetics in ek is awful..

 

[benchgave]

both are fine, though EK is actually more detailed.

both are nice for sure.