I was pointed to this website by an FM resident who I precept that I did NOT allow to work in my ED upon graduation.
I'm a family medicine trained physician who practices full time at an EM/Hospitalist program (yes... treat the patient in the ED..admit if needed, and round on them).. average ED volume is 9000/year and 8-13 inpatients/day census. I'm the county EMS director, the ED Medical Director and the Hospitalist Medical Director.
Also am senior staff physician at a university affiliated FM residency program where I did my training.
The reason I wouldnt allow my FM resident is because he didn't have enough ED/ICU/Critical care experience neccessary to adequately cover my ED.
Rural Emergency Medicine is NOT urgent care. When you have a 3 year old asthmatic brought in tanking with an O2 sat of 60%, you better know what the heck you're doing.
When people choose to go to an ED, they expect a provider who knows how to handle their emergency. If you can't handle, please don't risk patient safety.
With that being said... the role of my physician group is different. ED patient care and Inpatient. The best docs for this are dually trained EM/IM or EM/FM. Second best are FM residency trained with VAST ED experience (usually look at 2000 hours over 3 years) with documented procedure logs, certifications, etc. Third are EM residency trained with recent inpatient (usually that's senior level ED residents or recent ED grads).
So there's a lot of overlap between the two specialties, but you have to respect that there are major differences between the two.
EM started off with FM and IM physicians covering ED's until there became official residencies. So there are "legacy ED physicians" who are grand-fathered in ABEM physicians who are primary care trained but lifelong ED practicing. For a long time, ABEM respected their founders and their foundation in primary care. Now they've become more concerned with protecting their "turf"...the ED. It's about patient safety, #1. But even if the physician in the ED is a primary care trained physician who's been practicing EM full time for 20+ years...they'd rather have an ED trained physician fresh out of residency....lately they've been pushing for PA/NPs (who are "trained" in EM) to cover EDs rather than primary care trained with vast ED experience. Again, it's about job security.
I'm very comfortable with the right physician covering. So if you're a FM residency trained physician, please do at least a 1 year EM fellowship or obtain >2000 hours in EM experience. In addition, I require ACLS, ATLS, PALS/APLS, prefer also ALSO, Fundamentals of Critical Care, EM Ultrasound training (we utilized ultrasound for FAST exams, LPs, lines, etc.....ultrasound is a MUST).
I don't care if a physician is certified by AAPS, if you're not up on the latest EM best practices/standards of care, I wont accept you in my ED. I have high standards, with the reason being patient safety.
Whatever field you're practicing in, preferably you'd be board certified, not just residency trained. If you're not board certified, you had better increase your knowledge/fundamental for PATIENT SAFETY.
No matter what, ED residency trained physicians despise the fact that you'll be practicing EM in any capacity. You have to see their point...they did EM residency, you didn't. You can run an urgent care, primary care clinic, do hospitalist work....they can't do most of that. So to add on the fact that you can practice EM? They don't really appreciate it
It's a window that will eventually close....EM residency trained physicians will eventually flock to rural EDs because they'll get sick of the inner city stress. But until then, non EM trained can still cover and make a pretty decent living.