This Idaho law sounds pretty vague....so pharmacists can prescribe for a drug that does not require a new diagnosis, but that is also self-limiting and minor. But anything that is self-limiting, would be new on reoccurence and require a new diagnosis? I don't do clia-waved testing, so maybe I'm missing something obvious, but I'm not aware of any that would diagnosis a condition that was minor and self-limiting. Blood glucose-no. Blood pressure-no.
The only use I could see of that law, is it codifies giving emergency supplies.
I get what you are thinking, JustFillit, if a poorly trained NP can prescribe, why not you? Unfortunately, as has been mentioned on this board, pharmacy missed that boat decades ago, and the boat ain't coming back. I don't see how prescribing antibiotics would be allowed by allowed by the Idaho law, but obviously you would (hopefully) know Idaho law better than me, and what it allows. As others have said, I don't know that standard pharmacist insurance covers writing prescriptions, I'd definitely check with your insurer and tread carefully. But hey, that's just me, if you want to live dangerously, go for it.