Emotional Support Animals

Started by erg923
This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.
Get help with your application

Use all the free resources available to you from SDN: articles, guides, expert advising, forums discussions, and school research.

Browse articles Compare schools My application plan Read Interview Feedback
Practice for interviews Ask an Advisor
Bayside said:
A company called ESAD is recruiting psychologists PA’s, and NP's in my area to provide “Emotional Animal Support letters of recommendation”. The ad has a lot of stuff about complying with HUD guidelines and offers $80-$120/hr compensation. By recruiting locally seems they're avoiding the internet evals but still looks very sketchy to me.
Click to expand...

Came across this today, enjoy:

www.esadoggy.com

Psychologist (PhD or PsyD) for Emotional Support Animal Assessments

All across America, Canada, and the globe, ESAD Int'l.'s team of licensed health care professionals provide emotional support animal letters and therapy thru online sessions.We've helped thousands of individuals and families achieve their goals. Let us help you.
www.esadoggy.com www.esadoggy.com
 
Advertisement - Members don't see this ad
AcronymAllergy said:
Unfortunately, I don't think they're going to have trouble finding providers willing to sign up. A chunk of psychologists need to really review the idea that giving patients everything they ask for is always a good thing.
Click to expand...

Plenty of diploma millers here from the shuttered diploma factory that are looking for work, I'd have to imagine some of them are doing this.
 
AbnormalPsych said:
Came across this today, enjoy:

www.esadoggy.com

Psychologist (PhD or PsyD) for Emotional Support Animal Assessments

All across America, Canada, and the globe, ESAD Int'l.'s team of licensed health care professionals provide emotional support animal letters and therapy thru online sessions.We've helped thousands of individuals and families achieve their goals. Let us help you.
www.esadoggy.com www.esadoggy.com
Click to expand...

WTF?

My favorite part: "ESADoggy is looking for forward-thinking Psychologists" 🤣
 
You guys missed some of the best stuff on the ESADoggy website about the founder:

Chaz Stevens is an American entrepreneur, journalist, and constitutional activist focused on First Amendment issues. In 2015, Stevens launched the Gay Pride Festivus Pole Generosity Fund, with donations supporting various LGBT youth organizations. Stevens was twice appointed Commissioner to the Deerfield Beach Housing Authority. Stevens is the founder and CEO of ESAD International. Stevens has appeared on Time, Huffington Post, Fox News, Slate, and MTV.
Click to expand...


EDIT: Apparently he is famous for this great accomplishment
 
Last edited:
SportsNeuroPsych said:
Hahaha. I wasn't allowed to proceed through the website to explore more since I'm not a "forward-thinking psychologist."

Again, WTFFFFFF
Click to expand...
I'm guessing that the primary focus of the founder's 'forward-thinking' is how much he is looking 'forward' to the exponential growth in his bank account by pyramiding and leveraging the actual labor of other providers.

Truly a step forward for our profession (of psychology) which is one of the newer professions in healthcare and society at large. The fact that this progress involves us emulating the ethics, rigor, and motivations of the world's 'oldest profession' is just an added bonus.
 
SportsNeuroPsych said:
WTF?

My favorite part: "ESADoggy is looking for forward-thinking Psychologists" 🤣
Click to expand...


This is my favorite part:

"We appreciate the occasional mulligan, so we have a one-time tolerance for a missed event. The second time? There is no second time."

Did I just get threatened by a job ad?
 
Ughh that ad tries so hard to be quirky and fun. It's like, we're a FUN job, we're not like those other jobs!
 
Advertisement - Members don't see this ad
Fan_of_Meehl said:
I'm guessing that the primary focus of the founder's 'forward-thinking' is how much he is looking 'forward' to the exponential growth in his bank account by pyramiding and leveraging the actual labor of other providers.

Truly a step forward for our profession (of psychology) which is one of the newer professions in healthcare and society at large. The fact that this progress involves us emulating the ethics, rigor, and motivations of the world's 'oldest profession' is just an added bonus.
Click to expand...

Except that their hourly rate can be higher than ours and they manage to get paid cash in hand rather than through insurance. We should be so lucky.
 
Sanman said:
Except that their hourly rate can be higher than ours and they manage to get paid cash in hand rather than through insurance. We should be so lucky.
Click to expand...
Good points. However, depending on work setting, we (arguably) get screwed harder and more often.
 
AbnormalPsych said:
This is my favorite part:

"We appreciate the occasional mulligan, so we have a one-time tolerance for a missed event. The second time? There is no second time."

Did I just get threatened by a job ad?
Click to expand...
And despite the gratuitous use of excessive superlatives to describe his 'most excellent' practice...'impeccable logic' can't be among them.

Either there IS a mulligan (a.k.a. second chance) or there isn't. My guess is the guy is a short skinny dude trying to take the initiative to exhibit preemptive 'alpha' dominance over people he's never even interacted with and who has a cheesy grin wider than his shirt-lapels and limp handshake.
 
Fan_of_Meehl said:
And despite the gratuitous use of excessive superlatives to describe his 'most excellent' practice...'impeccable logic' can't be among them.

Either there IS a mulligan (a.k.a. second chance) or there isn't. My guess is the guy is a short skinny dude trying to take the initiative to exhibit preemptive 'alpha' dominance over people he's never even interacted with and who has a cheesy grin wider than his shirt-lapels and limp handshake.
Click to expand...

The person is a offering a part-time contract to an already existing practice. Not sure where they get off telling you anything.
 
Good lord. The banner for their website implies that they are offering to write letters for a fee -- "save $60 on your emotional support letter!"

Looks like a great way to risk your license for a few (probably very few) extra bucks.
 
LadyHalcyon said:
What about if the ESA attacks someone? Can the psychologist be held liable? We are supposed to assess the human. What about assessing the animal to make sure they are an appropriate fit? I refuse to write these letters for patients and I think I'm going to refuse to allow them in my building as well.

Sent from my SM-G973U using Tapatalk
Click to expand...

I have read that, yes, if an ESA attacks someone the therapist who wrote the letter could be held liable.
 
I appreciate how "writing letters for a fee" is in quotation marks. As was mentioned above RE: the disclaimer about getting a letter for up to $60 less, I don't know that this all makes a great case for avoiding board sanctions.

And yes, there's the potential liability component. No clue whether or not it'd hold up in court, but is it worth the risk?
 
Last edited:
cara susanna said:
I have read that, yes, if an ESA attacks someone the therapist who wrote the letter could be held liable.
Click to expand...


Because I am bored, I did a not so deep dive into this. However, ESA status must be renewed annually with an MH professional. Letters must state specifically that the animal is required for travel (does not have to be stated, they can just be at home), and it would behoove any MH professional writing such a letter to first get a sign off from a veterinarian that the animal is safe to travel/ be in public and not a risk to others. Having a copy of such a letter can certainly help to reduce risk in a law suit.
 
Sanman said:
Because I am bored, I did a not so deep dive into this. However, ESA status must be renewed annually with an MH professional. Letters must state specifically that the animal is required for travel (does not have to be stated, they can just be at home), and it would behoove any MH professional writing such a letter to first get a sign off from a veterinarian that the animal is safe to travel/ be in public and not a risk to others. Having a copy of such a letter can certainly help to reduce risk in a law suit.
Click to expand...
I've asked this many times and I've looked high and low in the literature but can ANYONE point me to a published (peer reviewed or not) resource (book chapter, review article, assessment manual) that meaningfully operationalizes the process of these so-called 'evaluations' for suitability and medical necessity of an ESA? Like...just at a basic level of what actual procedures the assessor engages in to determine this and what a 'no' determination would look like (and what justifies a 'no')? I know there's a couple of critical articles critiquing the practice from a forensic perspective (Younggren), but is there, like, any kind of exposition of what this entails from the perspective of someone who supposedly practices regularly and semi-ethically/competently in this area? Any accredited/ reputable training programs doing this? Any books by reputable publishers?
 
Fan_of_Meehl said:
I've asked this many times and I've looked high and low in the literature but can ANYONE point me to a published (peer reviewed or not) resource (book chapter, review article, assessment manual) that meaningfully operationalizes the process of these so-called 'evaluations' for suitability and medical necessity of an ESA? Like...just at a basic level of what actual procedures the assessor engages in to determine this and what a 'no' determination would look like (and what justifies a 'no')? I know there's a couple of critical articles critiquing the practice from a forensic perspective (Younggren), but is there, like, any kind of exposition of what this entails from the perspective of someone who supposedly practices regularly and semi-ethically/competently in this area? Any accredited/ reputable training programs doing this? Any books by reputable publishers?
Click to expand...

So, I haven't really looked into the literature, but you can be half-legit in these evals. IMO, documentation is asking two assessment questions:

1. Does the person in question have a diagnosable MH disorder? This is bread and butter practice really. You can easily weed out the fakers/outright deniers

2. Will an emotional support animal help in the treatment of said disorder? Not sure what the literature says about this part if anything
 
Sanman said:
So, I haven't really looked into the literature, but you can be half-legit in these evals. IMO, documentation is asking two assessment questions:

1. Does the person in question have a diagnosable MH disorder? This is bread and butter practice really. You can easily weed out the fakers/outright deniers

2. Will an emotional support animal help in the treatment of said disorder? Not sure what the literature says about this part if anything
Click to expand...
1. Is no problem doing, as you point out.

2. Is complicated by many factors, not the least of which is the inconvenient fact that the twin evidence-based treatment elements (exposure and cognitive restructuring) effective in treating PTSD/anxiety are fundamentally incompatible with an approach that asserts that prescribing a dog is 'medically necessary' to treat/manage that condition. The dog is clearly functioning as a 'safety behavior' (inimical to exposure therapy) and is also an enacted stuck point ("If I leave my house without my dog, I won't be able to function").
 
Fan_of_Meehl said:
1. Is no problem doing, as you point out.

2. Is complicated by many factors, not the least of which is the inconvenient fact that the twin evidence-based treatment elements (exposure and cognitive restructuring) effective in treating PTSD/anxiety are fundamentally incompatible with an approach that asserts that prescribing a dog is 'medically necessary' to treat/manage that condition. The dog is clearly functioning as a 'safety behavior' (inimical to exposure therapy) and is also an enacted stuck point ("If I leave my house without my dog, I won't be able to function").
Click to expand...


Of course, there is a case to be made for those that are treatment resistant or have dropped out of treatment altogether getting some relief and quality of life improvement. That said, we can clearly rule out that that an ESA will help managing your barophobia. So, possibly eligible in some cases and not in others.
 
Sanman said:
Of course, there is a case to be made for those that are treatment resistant or have dropped out of treatment altogether getting some relief and quality of life improvement. That said, we can clearly rule out that that an ESA will help managing your barophobia. So, possibly eligible in some cases and not in others.
Click to expand...
I've long opined that the future of the post-deployment clinic involves marijuana plantations and service-dog kennels. Throw in 'whole health drum circles' and we're off to the races.
 
Advertisement - Members don't see this ad
AcronymAllergy said:
My cynical side thinks that pretty soon, we'll be writing letters for "emotional support humans." A.k.a., friends.
Click to expand...
Or prescribing a fleet of mechanical "cleansing kitty" robots that accompany contamination-based OCD sufferers around enveloping them in a fine mist of mild but potent disinfectant spray. "Medically necessary" to prescribe in such cases, of course.
 
Fan_of_Meehl said:
I've asked this many times and I've looked high and low in the literature but can ANYONE point me to a published (peer reviewed or not) resource (book chapter, review article, assessment manual) that meaningfully operationalizes the process of these so-called 'evaluations' for suitability and medical necessity of an ESA? Like...just at a basic level of what actual procedures the assessor engages in to determine this and what a 'no' determination would look like (and what justifies a 'no')? I know there's a couple of critical articles critiquing the practice from a forensic perspective (Younggren), but is there, like, any kind of exposition of what this entails from the perspective of someone who supposedly practices regularly and semi-ethically/competently in this area? Any accredited/ reputable training programs doing this? Any books by reputable publishers?
Click to expand...


This is somewhat helpful

And this:

Younggren, J. N., Boness, C. L., Bryant, L. M., & Koocher, G. P. (2020). Emotional support animal assessments: Toward a standard and comprehensive model for mental health professionals. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 51(2), 156–162. https://doi.org/10.1037/pro0000260



Sent from my SM-G973U using Tapatalk
 
LadyHalcyon said:


This is somewhat helpful

And this:

Younggren, J. N., Boness, C. L., Bryant, L. M., & Koocher, G. P. (2020). Emotional support animal assessments: Toward a standard and comprehensive model for mental health professionals. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 51(2), 156–162. https://doi.org/10.1037/pro0000260



Sent from my SM-G973U using Tapatalk
Click to expand...

MamaPhD said:
"The client's emotional support animal is not a pet."

How does that work?
Click to expand...
No cuddling, playing, 'pet-naming,' participation in selfie photos, or use in posting to Reddit. And must sleep in a bed labeled 'Durable Medical Equipment.'
 
LadyHalcyon said:


This is somewhat helpful

And this:

Younggren, J. N., Boness, C. L., Bryant, L. M., & Koocher, G. P. (2020). Emotional support animal assessments: Toward a standard and comprehensive model for mental health professionals. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 51(2), 156–162. https://doi.org/10.1037/pro0000260



Sent from my SM-G973U using Tapatalk
Click to expand...

I wasn't aware of the most recent Younggren article. Thanks!
 
cara susanna said:
Sooo my understanding is that an ESA claim is basically saying that the person is disabled due to a MH condition and the animal improves functioning. Thus, wouldn't a solid assessment have to evaluate for disability?
Click to expand...

And, technically, if you try to bill insurance for a disability assessment, you are committing billing fraud.
 
BuckeyeLove said:
I think I've told you guys this before; one of my mentors was bored one day and legit got his hyper hot mess of a dog "certified" by a therapist all on line and without ever meeting anyone face to face. He used it to highlight this problematic area in a piece he wrote for a journal.
Click to expand...

Considering how ill-behaved and untrained the vast majority of "service" and "ESA" animals I've seen out in public, completely unsurprising. Unfortunately, the worst side effect is that people with legitimate disability and actually trained service animals are now viewed with suspicion.
 
cara susanna said:
Really? I didn't know that! How are they typically billed?
Click to expand...

Technically, physicians actually do have some codes that allow for billing of filling out certain kinds of disability-related forms. But, regarding MH codes and evaluations, most explicitly say that you can only bill for clinical services, with disability evals falling within a IME type of framework. Fact is, plenty of people do bill for these types of eval in psychology. It's just not enforced. In general, psychologists are fairly terrible at knowing how billing and coding work, and are even more ignorant of the laws surrounding what they do.
 
Advertisement - Members don't see this ad
cara susanna said:
Really? I didn't know that! How are they typically billed?
Click to expand...

They should NEVER be billed using insurance. Medical insurance is for healthcare. Disability is a legal issue that is essentially referring to HOW an illness affects X. It has almost nothing to do with the symptoms themselves.


And the Professional guidelines indicate that treating psychologists and psychiatrists should never do disability stuff for their patients. Of course most treatment providers are unaware of the very guidelines in this area in which they choose to practice...something something de facto evidence of negligence....

The proper method for this assessment is for the insurance carrier/ ssa to provide a third party evaluation. Most payers try to avoid this cost by telling the claimant he/she needs to have their treatment provider fill out some forms. Treatment providers just want to help someone and get them out of their office, so they do it. It’s the same way psychologists do an evaluation for a lawsuit using insurance.... they’re leaving a crap ton of money on the table, so legal professionals can make more.

And they are usually unaware that being on disability is correlated, independent of illness, with: increased mortality, lower age of death, more healthcare usage, increased rates of domestic violence, increased rates of children being on disability again independent of illness, etc.

And they never address how this an affective disorder can produce complete inabilty to work in any job, while individuals with severe intellectual disability maintain work.

The proper way to handle it: “it is my understanding that using healthcare insurance for non healthcare purposes constitutes fraud. I’m not willing to risk my license to for you. I would advise you or your attorney to request an independent evaluation. If your attorney wishes to speak with me, he/she can set up an appointment with the front desk at my forensic rate.”.
 
cara susanna said:
Really? I didn't know that! How are they typically billed?
Click to expand...

Health insurance is for healthcare. Same reason health insurance doesn't pay for assessing possible learning disorders or for custody or parenting evaluations, etc.
 
Sanman said:
I would assume cash only as I am not sure this would meet any medical necessity standard. So, once I am financially set for life and no longer need a license, I will be doing as many of these as I can. 😈😉
Click to expand...
And yet, as I understand it, most ESA / service animal "letters" are supposed or expected to include language asserting the "medical necessity" of the "prescribed" animal to address/manage symptoms of the disabling MH condition. Although, strickly speaking, this may only be true of "service animal" letters, in principle the same rationale is used to justify ESA letters (and associated laws). What a clusterbark.
 
PsyDr said:
The proper way to handle it: “it is my understanding that using healthcare insurance for non healthcare purposes constitutes fraud. I’m not willing to risk my license to for you. I would advise you or your attorney to request an independent evaluation. If your attorney wishes to speak with me, he/she can set up an appointment with the front desk at my forensic rate.”.
Click to expand...

Out of curiosity, what is a typical forensic rate as compared to therapy? Say 60m therapy = X, what would a forensic rate be?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Sanman
Merry Christmas...Ya filthy animals!
Replies
7
Views
965
Fan_of_Meehl
Fan_of_Meehl
N
Early Career Support
Replies
6
Views
1K
nicolascagephd
N
N
  • Poll Poll
Health Psychology: support and vent thread
Replies
39
Views
6K
oliversacks4thewin
oliversacks4thewin
N
Health Psychology Support Thread/Discord
Replies
5
Views
3K
nicolascagephd
N
DynamicDidactic
Aurora VA’s Suicide Prevention Center Rife with “emotional, mental and psychological abuse”
Replies
14
Views
3K
futureapppsy2
futureapppsy2