How often does a general dentist opt to do posterior root canals or just RCT on teeth with more than one canal?
I’m not quite sure that the number of canals or anterior vs posterior is an adequate assessment of difficulty. I think any endodontist would agree that sometimes single rooted teeth can prove most difficult. As others said... that’s the beauty of being a gp. You can cherry pick the cases in which to refer. I believe that it takes a certain level of experience to adequately assess each case in order to practice within ones ability’s.How often does a general dentist opt to do posterior root canals or just RCT on teeth with more than one canal?
How often does a general dentist opt to do posterior root canals or just RCT on teeth with more than one canal?
It takes practice and repetition. Good access and visibility is key. Trust your apex locator. Don’t force the irrigant. When you finally obturate, use the tapered cone that matches your rotary file. Not too much sealant, place your cone in SLOWLY to avoid hydraulic trapping and so it can flow into accessory canals.The instructors are very specific about what they want and it seemed meticulous which I'm sure root canals are. I want to learn how to do great root canals but it seems like I'm just trying to get done before the end of lab rather than practice and learn before doing them on actual patients. Doing them in less than an hour seems impossible right now but maybe without the check offs it can be possible. Since it takes me so long to do just one canal, I was thinking it would be so much harder and time consuming to finding some of the canals on a molar and obturating. Also, I feel like there is alot of risk involved with perforating, sealer going past the apex, NaOCl damaging tissue, not reaching working length, cleaning out canal properly, etc.
I use Edge Endo X7 with single cone BC sealer. Never really got into WaveOne Gold. Pricey and aggressive in coronal half for molars IMO.
I try to get most done in 1 appt (usually 1.5 to 2 hours). Sometimes temporize with formocrescol pellet (yes, formocrescol) and finish endo 2nd visit if pus drainage or difficult canals.
IMO, the hardest cases are splitted premolars with 3 or more canals. I refer those out.
The instructors are very specific about what they want and it seemed meticulous which I'm sure root canals are. I want to learn how to do great root canals but it seems like I'm just trying to get done before the end of lab rather than practice and learn before doing them on actual patients. Doing them in less than an hour seems impossible right now but maybe without the check offs it can be possible. Since it takes me so long to do just one canal, I was thinking it would be so much harder and time consuming to finding some of the canals on a molar and obturating. Also, I feel like there is alot of risk involved with perforating, sealer going past the apex, NaOCl damaging tissue, not reaching working length, cleaning out canal properly, etc.
Trust your apex locator.
I like Edge Endo as well, but I use their Glidepath files. I get WL with a #10 K-file and I switch to glidepath rotary and get it to a size 35 in one pass. I use protaper rotary so I just switch out to the included orifice opener followed by cleaning and shaping and single cone obturation.Edge Endo is a capable, less expensive competitor to WaveOne Gold. Since I work at a predominant Medicaid DMO, I don't have as many choices. I wanted to try Edge but never materialized. I never have any problems with aggressive instruments because I exert very light, passive pressure. I appreciate the reciprocating action which makes light, passive instrumentation very efficient. I watched on YouTube how endodontists negotiate very challenging canals. They have a lot of toys I won't be able to obtain so more power to them.
When I was in the USAF, my day was ruined every time I see any endo cases on my schedule. I asked an endodontist how she accesses the molars and she uses the Brasseler Endo Z pulp shaping bur. That bur revolutionized my RCT procedures. Imagine smoothing the canals so the instruments slide in instead of impeding on ledges. Endo is ACCESS, ACCESS, ACCESS, It will reduce iatrogenic events like perforation, ledging, and instr separation. Many molar accesses done by GPs are deficient. The accesses I see are too wide (very ledged) and orifices are not fully opened. If you can achieve proper molar access which IMO is one that your DA can stick paper points down all 4 or 5 canals, you can complete it in very short time.
It depends on your skill level/comfort with the procedure AND your patient demographics.
I love endo, but it’s not something I get to do every day. Not even close.
I’ve always kept this in mind though: The most successful general dentists I’ve met with (and these guys are absolutely killing it, and their level of dentistry is what I aspire to do), have always had 1 thing in common - every single one of them refers 100% of endo to an Endodontist - even anterior teeth. They didn’t even have files in their practices.
He should have used the scan before treating it. Why on earth would you spend 100K on a machine and not use it for a maxillary molar with a lesion on the MB root? ALARA (2015) is dated and has no scientific backing. I have no problem with 2 visit treatment if it’s indicated. But if you have a CBCT, didn’t take an image, now have to bring the patient back to take an image and look for MB2, that just seems like poor decision making.Last week I referred #14 with PARL on MB root to an endodontist. He couldn't find the MB2 canal. He has the usual endo toys of ultrasonic, operating microscope, CBCT and various other instruments for that purpose. He didn't use the CBCT but had to schedule a 2nd visit which I believe he will use it. The pt is in her mid 30's with no crown on #14 so the x-ray looked doable (the older the pt, the smaller and more calcified the canals are). Fortunately I punted that case. According to an endodontist on Youtube, he could only locate and instr about 80% of MB2s.
I'm thinking he thought he could breeze through it because the x-ray looked straight forward. By the time he encountered difficulties, his next pt is coming in. I was watching RealWorld Endo on Youtube and the guy could only get 80% MB2s. I got spooked because in the past I must have been doing them wrong. The only upper molars I will be doing will be no PARL (could still have apical lesions that haven't penetrated cortical bone) on young pts with large canals.He should have used the scan before treating it. Why on earth would you spend 100K on a machine and not use it for a maxillary molar with a lesion on the MB root? ALARA (2015) is dated and has no scientific backing. I have no problem with 2 visit treatment if it’s indicated. But if you have a CBCT, didn’t take an image, now have to bring the patient back to take an image and look for MB2, that just seems like poor decision making.
I'd agree. It was probably a time-management issue and he or she just ran out of time. If the plan was to 2 step from the get-go, the 2nd visit didn't change the plan or the amount of time the case will take.I'm thinking he thought he could breeze through it because the x-ray looked straight forward. By the time he encountered difficulties, his next pt is coming in. I was watching RealWorld Endo on Youtube and the guy could only get 80% MB2s. I got spooked because in the past I must have been doing them wrong. The only upper molars I will be doing will be no PARL (could still have apical lesions that haven't penetrated cortical bone) on young pts with large canals.
I've been in GP practice 34 years...I haven't done endo for 20 plus years. From a practice management standpoint I always felt it was disruptive to my schedule. I have planned emergency time in my day but I want it to be predictable. I don't want 50 minutes of emergency time in the schedule because some days we may not have any emergency calls. Also, I found endo patients called over the weekend more than other procedures. I am a good source of referrals so the endodontists will see my patients the same day-which I insist on. This is what has worked for me.
Can’t really get an associateship now a days without doing at least molar endo, all surgical extractions if not implant placement as well. It’s getting ridiculous, it wasn’t like this even 3-4 years when I graduated and was interviewing for associateships.This makes sense. A seasoned veteran dentist who knows what works best for his office. I would also add that this dentist is most likely financially comfortable and is in a position to pick and choose what procedures work best for him/her.
Now enter the cash strapped, debt laden new dentist. Are they economically forced to perform difficult molar RCTs, implants, ortho aligners, difficult extractions, etc. etc.? Not wanting that potential production to be referred down the street?
Or are they doing these difficult procedures because they like them?
Can’t really get an associateship now a days without doing at least molar endo, all surgical extractions if not implant placement as well. It’s getting ridiculous, it wasn’t like this even 3-4 years when I graduated and was interviewing for associateships.
I feel like every time I become good at a “speciality” skill there’s always another one I don’t have. I am very good at extractions and I have been doing more endos. But because I don’t place implants I can’t get a job now!? Pre-pandemic back in Jan feb when I was looking for an associateship and now as well. Some offices want implant placement but don’t provide a CBCT for it, makes no sense.
Can’t really get an associateship now a days without doing at least molar endo, all surgical extractions if not implant placement as well. It’s getting ridiculous, it wasn’t like this even 3-4 years when I graduated and was interviewing for associateships.
I feel like every time I become good at a “speciality” skill there’s always another one I don’t have. I am very good at extractions and I have been doing more endos. But because I don’t place implants I can’t get a job now!? Pre-pandemic back in Jan feb when I was looking for an associateship and now as well. Some offices want implant placement but don’t provide a CBCT for it, makes no sense.
Yes. Ridiculous requirements.Can’t really get an associateship now a days without doing at least molar endo, all surgical extractions if not implant placement as well. It’s getting ridiculous, it wasn’t like this even 3-4 years when I graduated and was interviewing for associateships.
I feel like every time I become good at a “speciality” skill there’s always another one I don’t have. I am very good at extractions and I have been doing more endos. But because I don’t place implants I can’t get a job now!? Pre-pandemic back in Jan feb when I was looking for an associateship and now as well. Some offices want implant placement but don’t provide a CBCT for it, makes no sense.
My previous owner was like that. He could do "all procedures", but personally, it was pretty ****ty quality. Crown prep in 10 minutes for all teeth, feather edge all = no apparent margin or found few J shape ones, molar endo without rubberdam or missing MB2s. Those RCT fail in a year or two and he would extract and do implant + bone graft. Not checking KT around implant and those would fail eventually. Then would do "gingivectomy" when patient gets peri-implantitis, list goes on.I think this is put into place to separate the go-getters v. the ones that require formal training to perform a procedure. Anyone can say they can place an implant or do a molar rct, and I think that people looking for these associates are ones that want someone who will do any procedure regardless of the quality/generated liability just to increase production and billable procedures.
Yes. Ridiculous requirements.
My previous owner was like that. He could do "all procedures", but personally, it was pretty ****ty quality. Crown prep in 10 minutes for all teeth, feather edge all = no apparent margin or found few J shape ones, molar endo without rubberdam or missing MB2s. Those RCT fail in a year or two and he would extract and do implant + bone graft. Not checking KT around implant and those would fail eventually. Then would do "gingivectomy" when patient gets peri-implantitis, list goes on.
Having seen that, I don't think I can be a "go-getter". I understand practice makes perfect but as new grads, I believe one should take enough CEs and personally, this way of practice is not ethical.