#1 does not make sense... So 3.5 from community college gets in before 3.0 from a more competitive university?
#2 just like people can't get jobs do you think it will be easier to get internships? Aren't internship hours already required with those with tech hours getting waivers.
#3 most student loans are high because of how students choose to live their lives not pure tuition. Starbucks everyday, expensive campus apartments..... these things add up.
#5 doesn't make sense at all in the real world . To be a doctor work as an MA first? To be a Veterinarian be a vet tech that is PURE NONSENSE.
In general you are setting yourself as some standard for admission and it doesn't make sense to me. Some people no matter how smart or what experiences they have should not do certain jobs. I know a lot of techs that have gone on the pharmacy school that I can see killing people in the future.
It is simple supply and demand..... For years people have been going to pharmacy schools because of the career benefits: salaries/stability and that caused the problem. Yes there are too many schools especially substandard ones but people have to apply/attend for them to stay in business. Right now the system is self correcting, messing pharmacists up in the process and it won't just be retail. Hospital salaries increased to keep up with retail, what do you think will happen to those salaries when retail salaries are in the gutter and every one has a residency?
TODAY- Pharmacy, retail pharmacy especially, is a sunk ship not just for new grads but for everyone. WAG is already terminating experienced more costly pharmacists and replacing them with new grads. Even if you get a higher hourly rate you get less hours spread over 5 days creating a situation of 32 hrs @54/hr = 43/hr. Don't forget that they are cutting cost so you are lucky if you have anything more than a 1:2 pharmacist/tech ratio, immunizations, dumb calls you make for metrics, waiters and all other BS things that you as a PharmD are required to do. All this while some none health professional tries to dictate what you do while all responsibilities fall on your license.
SO FOR ALL YOU THINKING ABOUT PHARMACY SCHOOL- DON'T GO IF YOU ARE IN IT FOR MONEY CAUSE ITS NOT THERE
FOR ALL THOSE IN PHARMACY SCHOOL- BE PREPARED FOR POST GRADUATION WORLD/JUMP SHIP IF YOU HAVE OPTIONS
FOR THOSE PRACTICING- LET US ALL TRY TO SURVIVE
I understand everything you are posting. TranslationalRPh suggested improvements, so I provided suggestions.
The obvious answer to the job question is: do not look into retail or community pharmacy as it has been a sinking ship for 5-10 years longer than this post was made (metaphorically speaking at the bottom of the ocean with little hope of surfacing at this point). What about those that specialized as community pharmacy residents or those in community pharmacy management (PGY2)? Will they be the next Alex Barker, PharmD or will they own their own business long after their "excitement" has died?
Pharmacists and students have known this for awhile. Negative posts are more frequent after 2018 as compared to before I was in pharmacy school (2014); furthermore, residency-trained and/or clinical pharmacists seem either immune to these effects or have less to deal with than their retail pharmacy/community pharmacy counterparts. That is what the posts on this forum are implying.
There are the chosen few that found a specialty pharmacy job even though they did not pass their MPJE for Florida until 1.5 years after graduation; from your post, I am surmising those occurrences are rare. People still think retail is not clinical due to the emphasis on dispensing rather than service provision you alluded to, which is why these pharmacists are trapped behind employer and license expectations. Regulations have obviously not kept up with the way pharmacists are trained.
"We are training for jobs that do not exist yet." That is what my pharmacy school dean told us in 2014. Employers are so stuck with tradition that they forget pharmacy, which is why remote positions are hard to come by and the majority of pharmacists do not like retail (at least those that can fake it long enough). The pharmacists are limited in what services they can perform despite their education and training. Provider status will just create more problems; we need a better strategy.
ASHP is already undergoing negotiations for residency programs. Do you honestly think every pharmacy graduate will have a residency with such a low program growth rate? I doubt the residency program growth rate and the student graduation rate will meet for the next 2-3 decades (20-30 years), yet individuals without residencies still gain clinical and specialty positions.
Most pharmacists posting to this forum will not be alive by the time the residency growth rate reaches the graduation rate. In case you were not following, ASHP did not meet their goal of having 100% of graduates in a residency by 2020. It is 2020 now and we did not see that happen. Furthermore, most clinical pharmacists have a pharmacy practice residency and greater specialization, but not all of them do. It has been said on this forum time and time again: residencies do not guarantee jobs. Residencies guarantee training opportunities. Most residents with their profiles posted on LinkedIn gain clinical positions while there are a few residents that scramble for jobs and end up taking retail, which is a slap in the face to their "arduous" training.
It has been said on this forum time and time again: pharmacy residencies do not guarantee jobs. Pharmacy residencies guarantee training opportunities. Some residents, like my preceptor, had to work in WAG after her residency in Ambulatory Care pharmacy; this was before the state of the market now and she checked all the boxes: Rho Chi, Kappa Epsilon, work experience, research, poignant letter of intent, glowing letters of recommendation, etcetera. Some had to work for a few years before becoming professors AFTER the residency in Pharmacy Practice. Most professors are not posting their residency training anymore on LinkedIn to protect themselves and their careers. She was also an adjunct professor to start, not a full-time professor. She's tenured now, but it took a long time.
I do have a few questions though:
1. Why not set yourself up for remote pharmacist positions; they do exist?
2. What suggestions do you have for correcting this oversaturation problem?
3. Why work for retail in the first place if people know the market is that bad, even for an initial job?
I am interested in your evidence-based suggestions; we can agree that complaints are moot. Complaints are all over social media, even here.