-
CycleTrack and SDN are teaming up to make medical school admissions more transparent and accessible! Read the announcement to learn how we’re supporting the future of CycleTrack’s free application-tracking tools .
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Epidurogram
Started by painfree23
Get help with your application
Use all the free resources available to you from SDN: articles, guides, expert advising, forums discussions, and school research.
bill it never. no useful clinical information can be gleaned. id offer it is fraud every time.
exception: no ability to get mri or ct.
exception: no ability to get mri or ct.
Don't bill this code.
Advertisement - Members don't see this ad
Never. Pigs get fat. Hogs get slaughtered.
Ok good. I don't. But seen it a few times on patients outside pain records...just wanted to make sure I wasn't missing on anything...other than FraudNever. Pigs get fat. Hogs get slaughtered.
This is what I've found when it comes to epidurograms. I think it's an overbilling/fraud issue. Similar to unbundling flouro guidance from epidural injections.
Coding of Diagnostic and Therapeutic Spinal Procedures - American College of Radiology
Epidurography
"Epidurography consists of a diagnostic evaluation following an injection of contrast into the epidural space, and must include permanent image-recording and a formal diagnostic radiology report. The injection of contrast alone is not sufficient to code for a formal diagnostic study, since CPT defines spinal injection surgical codes as being inclusive of the injection of contrast. In epidurography, the epidural space is visualized to evaluate the nerves and nerve roots, and to identify whether there is free flow of contrast within the epidural space. Areas of scarring, swelling, narrowing, or abnormalities of the nerves can be seen. Based on the findings of epidurography, treatment options can be considered. When epidurography is performed as a separate diagnostic study, CPT code 72275 may be used. The injection procedure for epidurography is coded separately with 62311. Code 72275 includes the use of fluoroscopy. If epidural injections are performed in separate regions of the spine, each region may be coded and reported separately.4 For example, to report epidurography performed at the cervical and lumbar regions, codes 62310 and 72275 would be reported for the cervical region, and codes 62311 and 72275 would be reported for the lumbar region."
Coding of Diagnostic and Therapeutic Spinal Procedures - American College of Radiology
Epidurography
"Epidurography consists of a diagnostic evaluation following an injection of contrast into the epidural space, and must include permanent image-recording and a formal diagnostic radiology report. The injection of contrast alone is not sufficient to code for a formal diagnostic study, since CPT defines spinal injection surgical codes as being inclusive of the injection of contrast. In epidurography, the epidural space is visualized to evaluate the nerves and nerve roots, and to identify whether there is free flow of contrast within the epidural space. Areas of scarring, swelling, narrowing, or abnormalities of the nerves can be seen. Based on the findings of epidurography, treatment options can be considered. When epidurography is performed as a separate diagnostic study, CPT code 72275 may be used. The injection procedure for epidurography is coded separately with 62311. Code 72275 includes the use of fluoroscopy. If epidural injections are performed in separate regions of the spine, each region may be coded and reported separately.4 For example, to report epidurography performed at the cervical and lumbar regions, codes 62310 and 72275 would be reported for the cervical region, and codes 62311 and 72275 would be reported for the lumbar region."
Besides it being bordering on fraud, the code is never covered when submitted for PA's anyways. I'd imagine the only time it would ever be paid would be auto/worker's comp. I would not bother billing unless you like audits.
Besides it being bordering on fraud, the code is never covered when submitted for PA's anyways. I'd imagine the only time it would ever be paid would be auto/worker's comp. I would not bother billing unless you like audits.
i am not suggesting this, but ive seen hospital based docs bill it for the RVU. the administrators are clueless and the doc will get the value for the RVU without the actual $$# coming in. ive seen it work for years without a problem for this particular (a-hole) doc
i am not suggesting this, but ive seen hospital based docs bill it for the RVU. the administrators are clueless and the doc will get the value for the RVU without the actual $$# coming in. ive seen it work for years without a problem for this particular (a-hole) doc
Do they not look at actual collections? Ridiculous.
Do they not look at actual collections? Ridiculous.
1 biller for 50 docs?
eventually they might catch it. they should, at least.....
i am not suggesting this, but ive seen hospital based docs bill it for the RVU. the administrators are clueless and the doc will get the value for the RVU without the actual $$# coming in. ive seen it work for years without a problem for this particular (a-hole) doc
If CMS, then retroactively they can and should take back the money. This is fraud unless performed as a diagnostic only with no steroid, no therapeutic intent.
Isn't there whistle blower money you could get SSdoc? Re: Medicare fruad
If CMS, then retroactively they can and should take back the money. This is fraud unless performed as a diagnostic only with no steroid, no therapeutic intent.
A. it would piss off a lot of people
B. If not sure the hospital actually got paid for the service, so i dont think they can retroactively take money back that was never paid.
C. i dont think medicare would go after the small potatoes, especially if they never paid it out. i cant track the collections
D. the people upstairs know my thoughts on the subject
Advertisement - Members don't see this ad
A. it would piss off a lot of people
B. If not sure the hospital actually got paid for the service, so i dont think they can retroactively take money back that was never paid.
C. i dont think medicare would go after the small potatoes, especially if they never paid it out. i cant track the collections
D. the people upstairs know my thoughts on the subject
The hospital can take back the money credited to the doc. I have reviewed cases of this on other doctors before and assisted with garnishing and then firing of the offending doc.
RVU's do not just double in a year.