So I did EK1001 Chem and hit the following question:
Consier the rxn:
2 H2(g) + O2(g) --> 2 H2O(g)
Which would decrease the proportion of water vapor at equilibrium?
A. Increasing partial pressure of oxygen gas
B. Decreasing the volume of the container
C. Reducing the amount of catalyst present
D. Raising the temperature
I remembered thinking at the time there was no evidence either way for D since the question doesn't state if it's exothermic or endothermic. In a moment of doubt and rush, I chose another choice because I wasn't satisfied with any of them. The question said "Which would..." not "which could." If the question said it was endothermic, D would have been wrong.
What should I assume on questions where it could go one way or another, but the question gives no evidence for either? Or am I just looking at this wrong?
Consier the rxn:
2 H2(g) + O2(g) --> 2 H2O(g)
Which would decrease the proportion of water vapor at equilibrium?
A. Increasing partial pressure of oxygen gas
B. Decreasing the volume of the container
C. Reducing the amount of catalyst present
D. Raising the temperature
I remembered thinking at the time there was no evidence either way for D since the question doesn't state if it's exothermic or endothermic. In a moment of doubt and rush, I chose another choice because I wasn't satisfied with any of them. The question said "Which would..." not "which could." If the question said it was endothermic, D would have been wrong.
What should I assume on questions where it could go one way or another, but the question gives no evidence for either? Or am I just looking at this wrong?