-
CycleTrack and SDN are teaming up to make medical school admissions more transparent and accessible! Read the announcement to learn how we’re supporting the future of CycleTrack’s free application-tracking tools .
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Event counting
Started by rcwha
Get help with your application
Use all the free resources available to you from SDN: articles, guides, expert advising, forums discussions, and school research.
Can somebody please explain how to use event counting (step by step) for top front end questions? It seems like that's the way to go in solving those types of questions.
I would greatly appreciate the help...Thanks
same here anyone please help
good question keep this post alive at the top so maybe someone can answer it
doc basically has it right, but it is hard to explain w/o using visual examples. the lines in one view correspond to events on the 3D object (sides, angles/points, etc.). these events obviously remain the same no matter which view you are looking at (they are fixed parts of the 3D object), so the lines representing them should demonstrate certain similarities between different views. like doc said, the verticals on top will also be verticals from the front. also, the horizontals on top will be verticals from the end. they don't have to be identical lines, since events will look different and therefore be represented differently from the different angles, but they do have to be there. therefore, the number of corresponding lines should remain the same.
i don't think that explanation made much sense, but i never liked event counting in the first place. it would usually only rule out one answer for me, maybe two if i got lucky, so i always found my time best spent just looking at the views and formulating the correct 3rd view in my mind, then finding it in the answers. if it works for you, though, go for it - i may have been doing it wrong or something
i don't think that explanation made much sense, but i never liked event counting in the first place. it would usually only rule out one answer for me, maybe two if i got lucky, so i always found my time best spent just looking at the views and formulating the correct 3rd view in my mind, then finding it in the answers. if it works for you, though, go for it - i may have been doing it wrong or something
yea that's true. event counting on the real DAT never actually works out. at best you'll be able to cross off one answer choice but the time spent counting lines could be better spent just looking at the figures and seeing which is the correct 3d model.
yea that's true. event counting on the real DAT never actually works out. at best you'll be able to cross off one answer choice but the time spent counting lines could be better spent just looking at the figures and seeing which is the correct 3d model.
it sometimes works on the real thing...i think it worked for like 4 problems that i had. use it when applicable as a weapon in your arsenal, but certainly not as a be-all end-all strategy. thats my advice.