I have a question about the exam krackers 16 mini mcat book.I am doing the exam krackers 10 week schedule plan (to a T) for the mcat and just finished my first week. Following the schedule everytime I took the 30 minute practice test for each subject from the exam krackers mcat book, i would do alright. I believe in biology i got a 9 for the first lecture. for physics also a 9 and got a similiar calculated score in the 1001 book. for verbal i recieved a 6. I know verbal requires much practice and it is only my first week and that is understandable. my bio and physics grades for lecture 1 in the books possibly could have been higher because I made some careless and stupid mistakes (not comfortable yet with taking tests that are much different from any other test I have taken, ex. passages and such). Maybe without the mistakes my score for the first lecture tests would have been a 10, possibly and 11. So now comes the question. At the end of the week you are supposed to take a mini mcat from exam krackers 16 mini mcat book. I took the first one, which I believe is based off the first lectures of the books. I pretty much bombed this mini mcat. for physics I couldnt answer more than half the questions, for verbal i did better than usually but i contribute that a bit too luck. for bio similar story to physics, I actually gave up and didnt finish because my will was gone.
My questions, are the 16 mini mcat tests a good reference point of where you are?
Why is it I did alright during the in class tests in the mcat books but in the mini mcat test I did horribly? Somebody please help or explain something that I might not be getting.
Thank you.
My questions, are the 16 mini mcat tests a good reference point of where you are?
Why is it I did alright during the in class tests in the mcat books but in the mini mcat test I did horribly? Somebody please help or explain something that I might not be getting.
Thank you.