-
CycleTrack and SDN are teaming up to make medical school admissions more transparent and accessible! Read the announcement to learn how we’re supporting the future of CycleTrack’s free application-tracking tools .
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Step I FA Biochem...Is that enough?
Started by Zback
Get help with your application
Use all the free resources available to you from SDN: articles, guides, expert advising, forums discussions, and school research.
depends on your retained level of knowledge from the course itself. I plan on tossing in Rapid Review Biochem through my fall semester as I study disease mechanisms. In the spring when I start hitting the board review study schedule, Ill annotate in FA from RR as needed.
I found it really helpful to break up the biochem chapter throughout my studying (ie 10-20 pages a week on top of whatever I studied that week) and then come back and review it all again. FA is definitely enough, but the chapter has a ton of info and sometimes does not read so well the first time around. By breaking it up, I was better able to integrate it with the other material which is very important. GOLJAN AUDIO really helped integrate material as well. Coming back to read it and turning back to relate it to the systems made it a breeze.
Biochem on my exam was sparse and very straightforward/predictable.
Limit the number of resources you use and you won't get overwhelmed.
Biochem on my exam was sparse and very straightforward/predictable.
Limit the number of resources you use and you won't get overwhelmed.
would you guys recommend RR over lippincott?
I reviewed with lippincott over the last ~2 weeks of regular class (because I was so weak in biochem), then used RR during my actual studying. I found RR to be much, much better.