Factitious Disorder Resources?

This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.

jdawgg

Full Member
10+ Year Member
5+ Year Member
15+ Year Member
Joined
Jul 17, 2007
Messages
110
Reaction score
1
I work in an eating disorder psych hospital and am starting to realize that a small but not insignificant minority of our patients manufacture sx (to varying degrees of severity) in order to secure further tx and maintain the sick role. Does anyone have any good resources on how to structure tx with factitious disorder as the primary dx? Direct confrontation only provokes further escalation and contingency management seems insufficient.

Members don't see this ad.
 
I work in an eating disorder psych hospital and am starting to realize that a small but not insignificant minority of our patients manufacture sx (to varying degrees of severity) in order to secure further tx and maintain the sick role. Does anyone have any good resources on how to structure tx with factitious disorder as the primary dx? Direct confrontation only provokes further escalation and contingency management seems insufficient.

Are you working in an eating disorder psych hospital as a clinician-in-training? This seems like an appropriate question for your clinical supervisor.

Direct confrontation is difficult unless you are skilled therapist (in the style of Kernberg's methods). The patient may not tolerate that type of therapy so you have to develop a different style with some patients, in the style of Kohut or Carl Rogers. But there may be more contemporary theorists who have evidence-based methods that may be more applicable (with the proper training).

For the purposes of this forum, my go-to-answer would be to do some research in peer-reviewed articles about psychotherapeutic treatment for factitious disorder in the eating disorder population by searching pub-med or one of the psych databases. I can't imagine that you can get a short-answer here because there could be various underlying issues with factitious disorder that are motivating the person to continue whatever problematic behaviors (secondary gain) and any legitimate answer would require more background on each case, which is not appropriate on this forum. I also couldn't imagine a eating disorder case where factitious disorder was the primary diagnoses. Malingering is one thing, but manifesting into full-blown disorder has to have some organic and social factors that are influencing the overall picture. And if you are evaluating someone with factitious disorder who presents with an eating disorder, wouldn't the eating disorder be qualified as more lethal and considered as the primary diagnosis regardless of severity of the factitious disorder? And if the factitious disorder is so severe, have you evaluated all the differential diagnoses, such as personality disorders. You have to consider that the issues that are presented as 'made-up' or unclear to you may be very real for the person.

You could look into schema therapy (or treatment that emphasizes both personality and changes in cognitions and behaviors), but you need specific training in order to proceed. With all that said, I can't say more unless I know your training background and at what level you are involved in treatment. I would just consult your colleagues at your clinic who may have direct access to more relevant information.

I wish I could be more helpful.

Good luck! :luck:
 
I work in an eating disorder psych hospital and am starting to realize that a small but not insignificant minority of our patients manufacture sx (to varying degrees of severity) in order to secure further tx and maintain the sick role. Does anyone have any good resources on how to structure tx with factitious disorder as the primary dx? Direct confrontation only provokes further escalation and contingency management seems insufficient.

This is definitely something to discuss with your supervisor, as you have a few moving parts that needs to be teased out before any diagnosis is made.

There are many factors that contribute to the development and maintenance of an ED. In particular, the presence of secondary gain factors can really increase the level of pathology, particularly when maladaptive behavior is reinforced by the family. This needs to be teased out because you need to rule in/out: somatoform disorders v. factitious disorders v. malingering. Part and parcel with this differentiation will be conscious v. unconscious involvement by the patient, which will address possible somatoform Dx's.

It's been a number of years since I've worked in the ED world, but let's assume there is a conscious effort to support the reported symptoms, which will rule out somatoform disorders. With this assumption, I have a strong suspicion malingering (as opposed to factitious dx) will be the more likely diagnosis because most ED cases will fail to meet Criterion C, which is the behavior is present while there is an absence of external incentive. Most ED cases may have a flavor of meeting the "sick role", but more likely than not the patient is just trying to distract/deflect away from having to confront/change anything related to his/her ED.
 
Last edited:
Top