Here is the link to the list of revised competency statements. They look much more straight forward than the current competency statements. These new statements are clear and to the point. To me they even seem like an useful tool to guide your studying if you are taking the NAPLEX after Nov 1st, 2015.
https://www.nabp.net/programs/examination/naplex/naplex-blueprint/#revised
Again, the statement NAPB released clearly states that the *revised* competency statements will go into effect on Nov 1st, 2015. "In addition, the NAPLEX
will make a progressive transition to a new administration model in 2016. At that time, the NAPLEX will
increase in length from 185 items to 250 items."
I am basing my response to this thread upon facts found on the NABP website. It clearly states that the NAPLEX will remain a 185 question exam until the end of 2015. However, the revised competency statements will go into effect on Nov 1st. People, let's not create confusion by posting frantic questions or comments that get everyone's hamster wheels spinning and thinking the worst.
As far as format, no, NABP has not announced that there will be a change in format. I'm answering that AGAIN based on the fact that the NABP has not published anything on its website that even alludes to that. If there were to be a slight change in format, NABP would announce it and it would make sense that the change in format would also apply to the Pre-NAPLEX. If that were the case, then anyone would be able to get a preview of the new format. However, it is unlikely that the format would change.
Here goes my speculation:
a. It would be very difficult to try to implement a drastic change in format between July 12th and Nov 1st. That involves a lot of testing. It is very unlikely. There just isn't enough time.
b. Because the time frame between the date the statement was released and the date the new competencies will go into effect is so SMALL, NABP would already have announced and published a statement outlining the new format. It has not. Thus, it won't happen.
It's always best to go straight to the horse's mouth and get your answer. That's my 2 cents.
Best,
Apotheker2015