I am bemused somewhat by that evaluation. I am a Neuro-Radiologist and interventional Radiologist. I interact almost daily with pathologists. What the pathologist knows as he diagnoses pathology in tissue is broadcast directly to about 20 to 50 doctors/day. He generally also must appear at or chair at least one conference of his fellow physicians/week. If he doesnt know his business, it wont take too long for the medical community to get to know this.
Pathologists have a hard time differentiating from the Osteosarcoma of teen-agers (remember the Kennedy youth?) of the leg, that will kill you unless the entire leg is removed; differentiating it from a perfectly harmless condition that requires no treatment, but looks almost exactly like the osteosarcoma. You can look up the full story on that on the internet.
So, the pathologist often turns to the Radiologist for this particular difficult diagnosis, and tries to get some help. The Radiologist has as much or more difficulty in making this diagnosis.
If the pathologist is wrong and causes the removal of the entire foot, leg and thigh from a young Elizabeth Taylor or Brittney Spears, or your own son or daughter; when there was no need whatsoever, he and everyone else must live with that decision (including the lawyers for the patient).
If the pathologist is wrong and does not have the leg removed, and the patient dies of osteosarcoma, he and everyone else (except the patient) must live with that.
That sort of thing can take a little of the fun out of this particular specialty.
If you are looking for an easy specialty, most anesthetists and anesthesiologist seem to find they can fairly completely understand and master their specialty after a reasonable length of time; and some find it a little boring after that. Urologists, for undetermined reasons usually come from the lower 1/3 of the class; so I suppose it may be easier than other specialties, but don't really know. Dermatologists don't have much night or weekend work. I would imagine that after one enters practice (particularly if it is solo) that it would be easier to hide one's ignorance if one were a dermatologist or psychiatrist than in most other specialties, but I have no proof of that.
I always had fun practicing medicine and putting my knowledge and skills up against others. It was fun at Hopkins and Duke to see if I could come up with a diagnosis quicker than someone else; but found this to be true in military and private practice also. I think it would be difficult to be a good doctor, and to enjoy one's work if one didn't find it intensely interesting.
Delmar H. Knudson, M.D.