Thoughts and experiences with the non-operative management of patients with far lateral, extra-foraminal symptomatic disc protrusions?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Why is it non operative?Thoughts and experiences with the non-operative management of patients with far lateral, extra-foraminal symptomatic disc protrusions?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I think there’s enough data to support doing the tfesi on full AC..... but I still haven’t done it on more than asa. We’re not curing cancer with an esi.Why not just stay a bit lateral since its extraforaminal anyway? I do TFESIs on Plavix so that doesn't bother me but if it does you, stay outside the spine. The problem isn't in the canal anyway.
Why not just stay a bit lateral since its extraforaminal anyway? I do TFESIs on Plavix so that doesn't bother me but if it does you, stay outside the spine. The problem isn't in the canal anyway.
Nope...Not worth it to me. If it goes against ASRA I'm not doing it bc we are talking about an elective procedure that doesn't always work and I'm not doing it.
Besides, let's be real and all agree there is NO SUCH THING as an inpatient TFESI. This is not emergent and this is preferential treatment for a VIP which is an even bigger reason to stick to guidelines...
No surgical opinion yet. I unfortunately have to see him tomorrow. I don’t normally see inpatients but he is a self-proclaimed VIP. Admitted via ER with a few weeks of worsening low back and LE pain. Radiologist reports a “far lateral extraforaminal disc hernation at L2-3 with surrounding soft tissue edema”. I briefly looked at MRI and must say this “disc” looks VERY far lateral.
Of course he is on Plavix as well as 325 mg ASA but expects that I’m somehow going to cure him by arranging a Saturday morning inpatient ESI so he can be good as new for thanksgiving.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Better have a witnessIf it merits an inpatient consult it must be an emergency. Better check sphincter tone.
i have done TF ESI on plavix on several occasions.
Pain Med. 2017 Mar 1;18(3):403-409. doi: 10.1093/pm/pnw108.Convince me is it worth the risk on Plavix. TF, not even IL.
Convince me is it worth the risk on Plavix. TF, not even IL.
Pain Med. 2017 Mar 1;18(3):403-409. doi: 10.1093/pm/pnw108.
The Risks of Continuing or Discontinuing Anticoagulants for Patients Undergoing Common Interventional Pain Procedures.
Endres S1, Shufelt A2, Bogduk N3.
Author information
Abstract
BACKGROUND:
Guidelines have been published that recommend discontinuing anticoagulants in patients undergoing interventional pain procedures. The safety and effectiveness of these guidelines have not been tested.
OBJECTIVES:
The present study was performed to determine if continuing or discontinuing anticoagulants for pain procedures is associated with a detectable risk of complications.
METHODS:
An observational study was conducted in a private practice in which some partners continued anticoagulants while other partners routinely discontinued anticoagulants.
RESULTS:
No complications attributable to anticoagulants were encountered in 4,766 procedures in which anticoagulants were continued. In 2,296 procedures in which anticoagulants were discontinued according to the guidelines, nine patients suffered serious morbidity, including two deaths.
CONCLUSIONS:
Lumbar transforaminal injections, lumbar medial branch blocks, trigger point injections, and sacroiliac joint blocks appear to be safe in patients who continue anticoagulants. In patients who discontinue anticoagulants, although low (0.2%) the risk of serious complications is not zero, and must be considered when deciding between continuing and discontinuing anticoagulants.
Convince me it is worth the risk to hold the thinner/antiplatelet.