Fastest MD/PhD ever?

This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.
Wow, that's interesting.

Looking at her CV and biography, the dates of her undergraduate years and post-graduate experience are too consistent for this to simply be a typo.

If we assume that Penn didn't allow any sort of shortening of the MD, then it implies that she did medical coursework and PhD research at the same time.

Observations:
-she didn't do a residency. if she wasnt interested in one in advance, its possible she prioritized her md grades less than her peers.
-by the time she submitted her dissertation, she had 2 first-author journal publications( langmuir, biotechnology progress), and several conference publications.
-she did combined experimental and computational work. She has a journal paper with her as first-author and her advisor as the only other author, which (probably) means that she was indeed actually running experiments, not just doing computational work with other people data.

From looking at the methods that her dissertation abstract mentions, and publications that her advisor had prior to 1993 (it looks like he did adhesion studies under similar conditions with different ligand-receptor pairs), it might be that the experimental methods she was using during her dissertation were already pretty robust.

Pretty insane though... probably a combination of an exceptional person and exceptional circumstances.
 
@neurotroph I'm just as confused, I was hoping someone here could explain haha.

@okemba totally agree with your assessment. I can hardly fathom the timeline required to finish MSTP in <7 years, but I guess if you're ambitious enough and everything happens to fall into place perfectly, it's possible.
 
Fastest PhD's that I have seen involve (1) luck+raw intelligence+hardwork/dedication combined with exceptional planning and foresight (2) amenable advisor +/- (3) child on the way.
 
Some googling shows that her master's adviser and her PhD adviser got their PhDs from the same lab, so there might have been a lot of transferability between her master's project and her PhD too.
 
A few comments on this....

1. She did a PhD in engineering. These can vary tremendously in terms of time. All dry work and yes, they can be done quickly relative to other fields.
2. She did not seem to have an interest in research. I have seen this elsewhere as well. When a student says "I don't really want to do research" they have to decide if they will let you go with minimal effort or drop you. Most places just let you off easy.
3. This person seems to neither practice medicine nor research. She has a 30-page CV, but it is mostly filled with nonsense. She seems to be publishing a lot of reviews and opinion pieces.

I'd advise you all to think... If you want a fast MSTP... is this the kind of career you want to have? Just as an administrator and teacher?
 
It really baffles me that there aren't a lot of books out there that give low-level advice on how to effectively plan and design experiments for graduate students.
 
Yeah so I actually know her in person and she's super awesome and she told my class a year ago that she enjoys academics much more and it took her a while to realize it. She's really nice and is an extremely amazing lecturer because she always relates stuff to her own personal experiences in research or the clinic! Not sure about the details cause I kinda forgot
 
Top