Fewer Biopsies Go to Pathology Labs when Gastroenterologists Use New Miniature M

This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.

KeratinPearls

Full Member
15+ Year Member
Joined
Apr 3, 2007
Messages
1,819
Reaction score
819
[FONT=Arial, Helvetica, serif]Fewer Biopsies Go to Pathology Labs when Gastroenterologists Use New Miniature Microscope .

November 29, 2011

Advances in use of probe-based Confocal Laser Endomicroscopy (pCLE) could mean that GIs refer fewer specimens to clinical pathology laboratories

Gastroenterologists are beginning to use what is being called the “world’s smallest microscope” to view tissue in situ and diagnose disease. It is a technology innovation that will have important ramifications for the anatomic pathology profession because this new system is designed to allow physicians to microscopically examine a patient’s GI tissue at the cellular level in its natural environment.

The product is entering clinical use in the United States. It is called Cellvizio and is manufactured by Mauna Kea Technologies (MKEA), a French company with offices in Newtown, Pennsylvania. Cellvizio is a miniature microscope that, once inserted into the GI tract, enables the physician to select cells for microscopic examination in order to make a more immediate decision regarding a diagnosis, as well as treatment.

In development for more than a decade, this flexible, fiber-optic microscope was launched in Europe after obtaining its CE mark in April, 2011. This was followed by its 501(k) clearance by the United States Food & Drug Administration (FDA) in September. In one document it filed with the FDA, Mauna Kea Technologies described the system as “‘The Cellvizio 100 Series System with Confocal Miniprobes’ is a confocal laser system with fiber optic probes that is intended to allow imaging of the internal microstructure of tissues in anatomical tracts, i.e., gastrointestinal or respiratory, accessed by an endoscope or endoscopic accessories.”

One contributing technology that went into this micro-miniature microscope is a high-density digital chip capable of performing several functions within a tiny module.

50 Medical Centers Already Use This New Micro-Mini Microscope System

Since it was cleared for market in September, about 50 medical centers in this country have acquired the Cellvizio system and put it into clinical use. Physicians use the system to examine live, moving gastrointestinal (GI) and biliary tissues in patients.

In Philadelphia, physicians at one of the area’s biomedical research institutes have had success with the Cellvizio focal probe. One of them is Bob Etemad, M.D., gastroenterologist at Lankenau Medical Center and Medical Director of Endoscopy at the Main Line Health System.

“Until now, if we found areas that appeared abnormal on endoscopy during one of our endoscopic procedures, we would have to [biopsy the tissue and] send it to a laboratory for analysis—which can take up to a week—to see what it looked like under the microscope,” stated Etemad, in a story published by Marketwatch.com.

“This sometimes is a problem when the biopsies do not confirm our suspicions,” continued Etemad. “We may then need to rebiopsy with an additional procedure. Also, the eye is not as sensitive to detect some subtle but dangerous precancerous changes.”

Etemad and his team now have a tool that helps them better identify the dangerous tissue during the initial diagnostic exam. This allows them to remove this tissue the same day, and then go back to ensure all of the diseased tissue was removed.

The Lankenau team is one of the first in the United States to use this new approach. It will be applied to gastrointestinal cancers and other GI diseases, including those of the colon, bile duct, pancreas, and esophagus. Etemad recently treated a patient originally diagnosed with Barrett’s esophagus, an abnormal precancerous change in the lower esophagus. Originally, this patient was told by her physician that her esophagus needed to be removed. The patient then got a second opinion from Dr. Etemad and learned that invasive surgery was not necessary. After three minimally invasive endoscopy procedures, she is cancer-free.
Essentially, the Cellivizio system is a focal probe threaded through a traditional endoscope. It is just one more example of how new technology breakthroughs are creating products that challenge the status quo in surgical pathology.

Possibility of Fewer GI Tissue Biopsy Referrals to Pathology Laboratories

Because gastroenterology groups generate large numbers of tissue specimens that are typically referred to pathologists for processing and diagnosis, a system such as Cellvizio has the potential to reduce the number of biopsies collected by GIs and referred to pathologists for diagnosis.

On the other hand, even if this micro-miniature microscope can allow gastroenterologists to evaluate individual cells and identify abnormal or malignant tissue, there will still be a need to collect a tissue biopsy for analysis of its DNA, RNA, and/or proteins. The complexity of those genetic tests and molecular diagnostics assays means that most of these tissue referrals will continue to be sent to pathologists.

At the same time it is important to recognize that this Cellvizo system has the potential to pull more testing away from the traditional anatomic pathology laboratory. In looking at this system, Michael J. Cima, Ph.D., at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, recognized that possibility when he stated that, by using these types of systems to look at tissue in situ, “we are going to bring the laboratory into the patient.”
 
This sounds like a good opportunity for pathologists. Who is better qualified to analyze histology? Pathologists should jump on this and open their own centers.


[FONT=Arial, Helvetica, serif]Fewer Biopsies Go to Pathology Labs when Gastroenterologists Use New Miniature Microscope .

November 29, 2011

Advances in use of probe-based Confocal Laser Endomicroscopy (pCLE) could mean that GIs refer fewer specimens to clinical pathology laboratories

Gastroenterologists are beginning to use what is being called the “world’s smallest microscope” to view tissue in situ and diagnose disease. It is a technology innovation that will have important ramifications for the anatomic pathology profession because this new system is designed to allow physicians to microscopically examine a patient’s GI tissue at the cellular level in its natural environment.

The product is entering clinical use in the United States. It is called Cellvizio and is manufactured by Mauna Kea Technologies (MKEA), a French company with offices in Newtown, Pennsylvania. Cellvizio is a miniature microscope that, once inserted into the GI tract, enables the physician to select cells for microscopic examination in order to make a more immediate decision regarding a diagnosis, as well as treatment.

In development for more than a decade, this flexible, fiber-optic microscope was launched in Europe after obtaining its CE mark in April, 2011. This was followed by its 501(k) clearance by the United States Food & Drug Administration (FDA) in September. In one document it filed with the FDA, Mauna Kea Technologies described the system as “‘The Cellvizio 100 Series System with Confocal Miniprobes’ is a confocal laser system with fiber optic probes that is intended to allow imaging of the internal microstructure of tissues in anatomical tracts, i.e., gastrointestinal or respiratory, accessed by an endoscope or endoscopic accessories.”

One contributing technology that went into this micro-miniature microscope is a high-density digital chip capable of performing several functions within a tiny module.

50 Medical Centers Already Use This New Micro-Mini Microscope System

Since it was cleared for market in September, about 50 medical centers in this country have acquired the Cellvizio system and put it into clinical use. Physicians use the system to examine live, moving gastrointestinal (GI) and biliary tissues in patients.

In Philadelphia, physicians at one of the area’s biomedical research institutes have had success with the Cellvizio focal probe. One of them is Bob Etemad, M.D., gastroenterologist at Lankenau Medical Center and Medical Director of Endoscopy at the Main Line Health System.

“Until now, if we found areas that appeared abnormal on endoscopy during one of our endoscopic procedures, we would have to [biopsy the tissue and] send it to a laboratory for analysis—which can take up to a week—to see what it looked like under the microscope,” stated Etemad, in a story published by Marketwatch.com.

“This sometimes is a problem when the biopsies do not confirm our suspicions,” continued Etemad. “We may then need to rebiopsy with an additional procedure. Also, the eye is not as sensitive to detect some subtle but dangerous precancerous changes.”

Etemad and his team now have a tool that helps them better identify the dangerous tissue during the initial diagnostic exam. This allows them to remove this tissue the same day, and then go back to ensure all of the diseased tissue was removed.

The Lankenau team is one of the first in the United States to use this new approach. It will be applied to gastrointestinal cancers and other GI diseases, including those of the colon, bile duct, pancreas, and esophagus. Etemad recently treated a patient originally diagnosed with Barrett’s esophagus, an abnormal precancerous change in the lower esophagus. Originally, this patient was told by her physician that her esophagus needed to be removed. The patient then got a second opinion from Dr. Etemad and learned that invasive surgery was not necessary. After three minimally invasive endoscopy procedures, she is cancer-free.
Essentially, the Cellivizio system is a focal probe threaded through a traditional endoscope. It is just one more example of how new technology breakthroughs are creating products that challenge the status quo in surgical pathology.

Possibility of Fewer GI Tissue Biopsy Referrals to Pathology Laboratories

Because gastroenterology groups generate large numbers of tissue specimens that are typically referred to pathologists for processing and diagnosis, a system such as Cellvizio has the potential to reduce the number of biopsies collected by GIs and referred to pathologists for diagnosis.

On the other hand, even if this micro-miniature microscope can allow gastroenterologists to evaluate individual cells and identify abnormal or malignant tissue, there will still be a need to collect a tissue biopsy for analysis of its DNA, RNA, and/or proteins. The complexity of those genetic tests and molecular diagnostics assays means that most of these tissue referrals will continue to be sent to pathologists.

At the same time it is important to recognize that this Cellvizo system has the potential to pull more testing away from the traditional anatomic pathology laboratory. In looking at this system, Michael J. Cima, Ph.D., at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, recognized that possibility when he stated that, by using these types of systems to look at tissue in situ, “we are going to bring the laboratory into the patient.”
 
This looks like it could be the beginning of interventional pathology.

But since pathology is full of pathologists, it won't be.
 
i read this article, and that is why i visited the forum today. glad to see you have started a discussion. so, are they saying that pathologists will go to the GI docs' offices to analyze what is seen under this tiny microscope? i am hoping this does not mean the GI docs are going to start doing "pathology". this is concerning to me as a GI pathologist...
 
We have Cellvisio where I practice and it has had no effect on the number biopsies. At my institution the pulmonologist is using it. I dont work at a very large hospital so it is migrating to smaller places. He loves to joke that he still needs us but I do see technology like this eating into our biopsy numbers at some point. He let us in the room a few times to see the technology. The magnification is amazing.

The days of sitting in a cushy office hoping to get cases sent to us is going away. The sooner people realize that, and wanna move forward, the better, Interventional is gonna have to be part of the future.
 
Reading only that spiel above, it sounds to me that this technology is only intended to improve the yield of diagnostic biopsy material, not to totally supplant the surg path examination of tissue prior to therapy.

I find it *very hard* to believe that they are taking a patient for esophagectomy without a glass slide tissue diagnosis.

If the profession relies so heavily on the billing of non-diagnostic biopsies to maintain solvency, things are far worse than I previously imagined... :scared:
 
http://www.cellvizio.net/user

If you create an account on the cellvizio website, you can go to self training where they have many videos of different pathologic findings. The images are moving quickly, and I find myself slowing them down to view them in more detail. Overall, I didn't think it was too difficult to interpret once you got used to it.
 
I'm not sure where the meme of "pathologists doing procedures" is coming from on this forum. Do you guys really think you're going to start doing endoscopies?

But yes, I highly doubt this is going to have a major impact on biopsy rates. It might actually increase biopsies because things will look abnormal and have to be biopsied to determine what it means. With experience that might go down. But current literature and clinical recommendations are based on histologic findings in conjunction with clinical findings. So you still need histology.
 
There have been similar confocal microscopy instruments that have been developed in dermatology as well (to screen for melanocytic lesions), and they haven't changed biopsy rates in the field. The gold standard is still histology.
 
My gracious we could envision a splendid short story concerning the plantiff's attorney's sob tale about the gastrectomy that was performed due to the reactive atypia from H. pylori. I'd be like Pontius Pilate and wash my hands from this sin.

I doubt that if there was not a financial return for this no one would utilize it.
 
While it could turn out to be an over-hyped, under effective methodology, I certainly wouldn't put it past the medical profession for it to supplant some or many traditional GI biopsies -- at least as much as radiology or other methods have in general -- given enough time, experience, data, and refinement of technology/technique. Really, as it is, many endoscopic GI biopsies seem like a stab in the dark and improving that efficiency, while not great for pathologists, is probably a good thing for the system as a whole.. Any GI folk have an average positive rate per slide? case? Obviously, a lot of things can affect that.
 
Really, as it is, many endoscopic GI biopsies seem like a stab in the dark and improving that efficiency, while not great for pathologists, is probably a good thing for the system as a whole.. Any GI folk have an average positive rate per slide? case? Obviously, a lot of things can affect that.

The question about positive rate is "positive for what?" Almost all of our our GI biopsies render useful information. Upper GI - is there H. pylori? Barrett? etc. Lower GI - even if the colonoscopy was unremarkable you can rule out microscopic colitis and what not. Even a negative biopsy is useful information.
 
..snip..
Even a negative biopsy is useful information.

Very fair point. My impression from residency was that the majority of our endoscopies with multiple GI biopsies revealed a lot of negative/nonspecific minimal chronic inflammation, and I understand why they were done even with a grossly negative endoscopy, though it seemed somewhat common that even with endoscopic suggestion of inflammation we didn't see any microscopically. Suspected neoplastic lesions seemed to have a much higher rate of finding some explanation microscopically.

I think the reach & limitations of this technology will become evident before long, but I would caution against assuming that it absolutely won't have any effect on pathology.
 
I think the reach & limitations of this technology will become evident before long, but I would caution against assuming that it absolutely won't have any effect on pathology.

Agree.
 
Top