Fight for the profession

[mountaindew2006]

Been quite for a while on here. I think it's obvious from all this CRNA vs MDA bantering that we MDAs (or now future MDAs) really need to strap a pair on.

Truly, I believe most of the reason why MDAs have been so passive is because most of them have been FMGs in the past. Not trying to offend anyone, but look at the stats, most MDAs now are either FMG or DO.

I think this new 'shockwave' of MDAs is great. With strength in numbers and more bold personalities we can finally get our profession back. I think those of us that 'sell out' and use CRNAs are empowering them because we are too lazy to do our own work. Yes that three hour lap chole may be a 'easy' case, but heck pay an agency anesthesiologist rather than a CRNA! Finally, with more MDAs the need for CRNAs can be reduced.

I write this because I have worked as a student in the past with many CRNAs who have been extremely 'sneaky'. They try to latch on to the MDAs and will act motivated, humble, whatever in order to learn the profession. In fact, MANY of time the CRNAs have stated derogatory things about attendings, and then vocalized to me, "I'm only kissing his a$$ for a little while to learn, once I know my stuff I'm going to go somewhere else where I can make more money". I assure you, by hiding themselves in front of this 'curtain' of "oh I love to learn, teach, and further my skills", CRNAs are simply doing it for the money!

The point of this is to create awareness for the future residents. Having gone on many interviews where PDs have come out and stated their disgust with CRNAs, I think it's finally time that we MDs and MDAs band together like the CRNAs/CRNA students and really become more assertive. The profession has done well in terms of advances, research, and financial gain. Let us not ruin these benefits for future MDAs who have gone the extra mile to educate themselves by means of undergraduate studies, medical school, and residency. Protect the turf which many of our 'forefathers' have created by separating ourselves from surgery.

 

[nitecap]

SO just how do you suppose MD's or MDA's as you say fill this void by not working with CRNA's. Of course AA's are an option but CRNA's lobby against that aggressively. As well there are far to few AA's to replace the 30,000 CRNA's with only a handful of programs, that would take at least a decade.

Then you are saying replace them with a MDA I guess locums you are refering to. You can hire 2 locum crna's to one MDA, so then you take a huge hit on that.

As for a negativity toward attendings. Dude get over it, hey some attendings CRNA's and MDA's alike I love while some I cringe when I even see them. Not everyone likes everyone. Hey sometimes the attendings I respect the least actually teach me the most so get over it.

SO eliminate CRNA's, then what happens to the 50 rural Texas counties that only have CRNA anesthesia providers, screw them I guess hey.

Listen, though MDA's control most of the market you dont control it all. You must be a CA1 I assume, due to the way you sound. Bottom line is you cant replace every CRNA with a AA due to lack of, and cant replace with MDA because you will take a loss finacially. SO heres a suggestion, try to get along with all, trust no one, do your job, and lobby for your interest. In the end or at least for the next 20 years there should be plenty of work for all AA, CRNA, and MDA's. CRNA's will migrate to rural areas where opportunities are greater and MDA's will retain controll of the urban areas.

You do have a point however on the FMG issue and possibly their lack of aggressiveness and lobbying connections compared to a huge percentage of SRNA's being white males. No intentions of racial or sexual discrimination just stating a point).To compare the aggressivness between the 2, hey a mans a man and they will protect their livelyhood using and measure possible.

 

[militarymd]

watch yourself MountainDew. Some day, you may be wishing that you had a well trained physician extender helping you out in a tough situation.

 

[lvspro]

 

[sean wilson]

While it makes for an easier day, when people are thinking of doing fellowships in order to "differentiate" themselves from CRNAs, you gotta wonder what the profession's coming to, my friend.

 

[mountaindew2006]

SO just how do you suppose MD's or MDA's as you say fill this void by not working with CRNA's. Of course AA's are an option but CRNA's lobby against that aggressively. As well there are far to few AA's to replace the 30,000 CRNA's with only a handful of programs, that would take at least a decade.

Then you are saying replace them with a MDA I guess locums you are refering to. You can hire 2 locum crna's to one MDA, so then you take a huge hit on that.

As for a negativity toward attendings. Dude get over it, hey some attendings CRNA's and MDA's alike I love while some I cringe when I even see them. Not everyone likes everyone. Hey sometimes the attendings I respect the least actually teach me the most so get over it.

SO eliminate CRNA's, then what happens to the 50 rural Texas counties that only have CRNA anesthesia providers, screw them I guess hey.

Listen, though MDA's control most of the market you dont control it all. You must be a CA1 I assume, due to the way you sound. Bottom line is you cant replace every CRNA with a AA due to lack of, and cant replace with MDA because you will take a loss finacially. SO heres a suggestion, try to get along with all, trust no one, do your job, and lobby for your interest. In the end or at least for the next 20 years there should be plenty of work for all AA, CRNA, and MDA's. CRNA's will migrate to rural areas where opportunities are greater and MDA's will retain controll of the urban areas.

You do have a point however on the FMG issue and possibly their lack of aggressiveness and lobbying connections compared to a huge percentage of SRNA's being white males. No intentions of racial or sexual discrimination just stating a point).To compare the aggressivness between the 2, hey a mans a man and they will protect their livelyhood using and measure possible.

I'm glad that this thread has so far been 'healthy' conversation and has not transpired into the toilet.

I agree w/ the FMG issue (well I know that hey MM, JPP, and others arent fitting the 'mold' but there are a lot of FMGs in the field).

Secondly, I agree at this point in time we can't just FIRE all the CRNAs which would cause a huge void in pt care. But...w/ the increased output of MDAs we can try to fix the gap b/w supply and demand of MDAs. Surely, the CRNA takeover did not occur overnight, thus the MDA take back does not have to occur quickly.

To MM, I agree physician extension providers are necessary. However, why not hire a CA-3 wanting to moonlight? why not get a locums person. Yes, it costs more...but it's keeping the profession w/i MDA control. I think too often CRNAs are used to 'help' w/ the 'boring stuff' but eventually they try to 'learn more' and begin to do more advanced procedures, etc.

It's like this guys. It's like the recent real estate boom. If everyone wants to sell their house at 300K in a neighborhood where the selling price was 250K...guess what the current selling price of homes will be 300K. Will that guy who's on the block listing his house for 250K sell? sure, he's cheap. That 'guy' is the CRNA in this analogy. The important thing is to keep those 'sellers' at a minimum and maintain the standard at 300K, thus giving value to each of the houses.

Now, i know this isnt real estate, but I think you all get the point.

And yes, I know someone on here will say, "isnt it about the patient and not the money?". I would say, well yes you are correct. Having more MDAs that are well paid will certainly amount to better health care for the patient.

Finally, Mr/Ms Nitecap, let's not begin the mud slinging by trying to pull out rank (ie 'oh mountaindew is a CA1' ,etc). Let's focus on the salient points and keep the derogatory marks to a minimum.

Thanks

 

[mountaindew2006]

While it makes for an easier day, when people are thinking of doing fellowships in order to "differentiate" themselves from CRNAs, you gotta wonder what the profession's coming to, my friend.

precisely. I've heard this. Attendings and residents alike are saying, CRNAs are taking over we need to do a Pain, crit care fellowship to differentiate.

I believe it was you MM that stated one should pursue fellowships because they enjoy the field and love it. I agree wholeheartedly. However, the way things are going doing a fellowship will be because one HAS to the bills, put food on the table, and pay back loans....not necessarily because they LOVE the field. Yes, unfortunate.

 

[militarymd]

I guess we have a difference in opinion. There is and always be a need for physician extenders. Internists need ward nurses. Intensivists need critical care nurses. Anesthesiologists will need CRNAs....in certain locales.

I will tell you this...there will NEVER be enough anesthesiologists to sit on ALL of the stools that need warming in the United States.

 

[timtye78]

While it makes for an easier day, when people are thinking of doing fellowships in order to "differentiate" themselves from CRNAs, you gotta wonder what the profession's coming to, my friend.

Our medical degrees, residency, and board certification differentiate us, my friend. The fact that we have medical licenses are another big distinguishing factor. It is a sad day when MDs and DOs, who are residency-trained and board certified clinicians;feel they must 'distinguish' themselves from RNs.

 

[TXANESTHETIST]

Been quite for a while on here. I think it's obvious from all this CRNA vs MDA bantering that we MDAs (or now future MDAs) really need to strap a pair on.

Truly, I believe most of the reason why MDAs have been so passive is because most of them have been FMGs in the past. Not trying to offend anyone, but look at the stats, most MDAs now are either FMG or DO.

I think this new 'shockwave' of MDAs is great. With strength in numbers and more bold personalities we can finally get our profession back. I think those of us that 'sell out' and use CRNAs are empowering them because we are too lazy to do our own work. Yes that three hour lap chole may be a 'easy' case, but heck pay an agency anesthesiologist rather than a CRNA! Finally, with more MDAs the need for CRNAs can be reduced.

I write this because I have worked as a student in the past with many CRNAs who have been extremely 'sneaky'. They try to latch on to the MDAs and will act motivated, humble, whatever in order to learn the profession. In fact, MANY of time the CRNAs have stated derogatory things about attendings, and then vocalized to me, "I'm only kissing his a$$ for a little while to learn, once I know my stuff I'm going to go somewhere else where I can make more money". I assure you, by hiding themselves in front of this 'curtain' of "oh I love to learn, teach, and further my skills", CRNAs are simply doing it for the money!

The point of this is to create awareness for the future residents. Having gone on many interviews where PDs have come out and stated their disgust with CRNAs, I think it's finally time that we MDs and MDAs band together like the CRNAs/CRNA students and really become more assertive. The profession has done well in terms of advances, research, and financial gain. Let us not ruin these benefits for future MDAs who have gone the extra mile to educate themselves by means of undergraduate studies, medical school, and residency. Protect the turf which many of our 'forefathers' have created by separating ourselves from surgery.

CHeck your history..."your profession". Nurses were the 1st to administer anesthesia besides for in the early days using the medical residents. If you actually look into the history of anesthesia and nurse anesthesia you will find that at the beginning anesthesia was not even a suitable hobby for a physician and that's why they let nurses do it, not to mention the nurses were great at it. I am not saying that MDA's are not great at it to, but all the bashing done to CRNA's is rediculous to those who don't even know the history of their "forefathers". Not until was there money and power involved in anesthesia practice did physicians think that CRNA's were incompetent! Come on.

 

[Disse]

CHeck your history..."your profession". Nurses were the 1st to administer anesthesia besides for in the early days using the medical residents. If you actually look into the history of anesthesia and nurse anesthesia you will find that at the beginning anesthesia was not even a suitable hobby for a physician and that's why they let nurses do it, not to mention the nurses were great at it. I am not saying that MDA's are not great at it to, but all the bashing done to CRNA's is rediculous to those who don't even know the history of their "forefathers". Not until was there money and power involved in anesthesia practice did physicians think that CRNA's were incompetent! Come on.

Exactly! And make sure we look at what happened when those power & money hungry physicians become more involved with anesthesia....like research, quality assurance, and equipment and anesthetic development

Of course, the problem is that those pesky physicians sure made providing anesthesia pretty damn safe. Rats.

Oh! And lets not forget the other good old days when you used to be able to go to them thar barbers.. get a good shave and have your appendix taken out in one visit! Why'd those dirty stinking power and money hungry surgeons have to get involved and knock out the ol' two-for-one deal we used to have? I mean.... it used to be shave, haircut & gallbladder removal for two bits...

Yeah. Those were the days.

 

[MAC10]

CHeck your history..."your profession". Nurses were the 1st to administer anesthesia besides for in the early days using the medical residents. If you actually look into the history of anesthesia and nurse anesthesia you will find that at the beginning anesthesia was not even a suitable hobby for a physician and that's why they let nurses do it, not to mention the nurses were great at it. I am not saying that MDA's are not great at it to, but all the bashing done to CRNA's is rediculous to those who don't even know the history of their "forefathers". Not until was there money and power involved in anesthesia practice did physicians think that CRNA's were incompetent! Come on.

Dont forget the medical students were in on the action too. Anesthesiology has evolved into a medical speciality..sorry.

 

[mountaindew2006]

CHeck your history..."your profession". Nurses were the 1st to administer anesthesia besides for in the early days using the medical residents. If you actually look into the history of anesthesia and nurse anesthesia you will find that at the beginning anesthesia was not even a suitable hobby for a physician and that's why they let nurses do it, not to mention the nurses were great at it. I am not saying that MDA's are not great at it to, but all the bashing done to CRNA's is rediculous to those who don't even know the history of their "forefathers". Not until was there money and power involved in anesthesia practice did physicians think that CRNA's were incompetent! Come on.

it's true nurses were part of the auxillary staff that helped w/ adminstration of anesthesia. however, as someone pointed out med students did as well.

btw TXANESTHETIST do you know what the mortality rate secondary to nurses providing anesthesia in the old day was? PRETTY BAD..i heard when nurses were doing it in the 'old days' it was close to 50%.

next, if you peruse Morgan and Mikhail and check out the first chapter, one could easily read: "the task of anesthesia was usually delegated to junior surgical house officers or medical students .....later surgeons at both the mayo clinic and ccf trained and employed nurses.".

So..if you want to get technical, doctors were the FIRST to adminster anesthesia. Secondly, the advancement of anesthesia was ALWAYS made by physicians. Docs that readily come to mind are Drs Waters, Lundy, and Guedel during the turn of the century. These guys are who made/began providing anesthesia safely and actually began to understand respiratory physio,etc. Unlike the nurses, etc that just held the ether mask. As the profession of anesthesiology progressed the Long Island Society of Anesthetists was formed,etc etc.

I realize someone must have told you back when you in nursing school that nurses were the first to provide gas. Well it's quite evident from the literature that that is a misnomer. Dont believe me still, go look it up.

 

[TXANESTHETIST]

btw TXANESTHETIST do you know what the mortality rate secondary to nurses providing anesthesia in the old day was? PRETTY BAD..i heard when nurses were doing it in the 'old days' it was close to 50%.

next, if you peruse Morgan and Mikhail and check out the first chapter, one could easily read: "the task of anesthesia was usually delegated to junior surgical house officers or medical students .....later surgeons at both the mayo clinic and ccf trained and employed nurses.".

So..if you want to get technical, doctors were the FIRST to adminster anesthesia. Secondly, the advancement of anesthesia was ALWAYS made by physicians. Docs that readily come to mind are Drs Waters, Lundy, and Guedel during the turn of the century. These guys are who made/began providing anesthesia safely and actually began to understand respiratory physio,etc. Unlike the nurses, etc that just held the ether mask. As the profession of anesthesiology progressed the Long Island Society of Anesthetists was formed,etc etc.

I realize someone must have told you back when you in nursing school that nurses were the first to provide gas. Well it's quite evident from the literature that that is a misnomer. Dont believe me still, go look it up. [/QUOTE]

That is why I said except when they used residents for anesthesia before nurses, so technically residents were the first. That wasn't working out too well, so the docs started training nurses. (maybe i wasn't clear in my post on this). What I meant to say was nurses were the first officially trained Anesthesia providers. I believe those who trained the nurses noted that they were excellent at what they did. Anesthesia in general has come a long way since then. I do believe that when the mortality was 50% and I would dare to say it was worse, was the case no matter who was providing the anesthesia at that time.

I am very thankful for medicine advancing anesthesia. They had all the money and power then. Think about it, back then people thought physicians were next to God. I think we all know better now that they are still human like anyone. Think about this fact also. Most all nurses were women and most all doctors were women. That was a big factor. Nursing is still wayyyyy behind medicine in terms of research, etc. It will only get better with time.

It is just frustrating that we don't support eachother and encourage eachothers practice, provide great care, etc. I personally think a team approach is best for anesthesia. Instead we have to constantly put eachother down, defend our education, etc. Just walk the walk and prove it on both ends!

Well, Happy Thanksgiving to everyone!

 

[nitecap]

it's true nurses were part of the auxillary staff that helped w/ adminstration of anesthesia. however, as someone pointed out med students did as well.

btw TXANESTHETIST do you know what the mortality rate secondary to nurses providing anesthesia in the old day was? PRETTY BAD..i heard when nurses were doing it in the 'old days' it was close to 50%.

next, if you peruse Morgan and Mikhail and check out the first chapter, one could easily read: "the task of anesthesia was usually delegated to junior surgical house officers or medical students .....later surgeons at both the mayo clinic and ccf trained and employed nurses.".

So..if you want to get technical, doctors were the FIRST to adminster anesthesia. Secondly, the advancement of anesthesia was ALWAYS made by physicians. Docs that readily come to mind are Drs Waters, Lundy, and Guedel during the turn of the century. These guys are who made/began providing anesthesia safely and actually began to understand respiratory physio,etc. Unlike the nurses, etc that just held the ether mask. As the profession of anesthesiology progressed the Long Island Society of Anesthetists was formed,etc etc.

I realize someone must have told you back when you in nursing school that nurses were the first to provide gas. Well it's quite evident from the literature that that is a misnomer. Dont believe me still, go look it up.

Exactly, they trained nurses because if a med student was given the task of anesthesia it was a put down back then b/c you couldnt learn the surgeons technique. Thats why they trained nurses to do so. Nurses pretty much ran the show for quit a while.

I believe it was Dr. Mayo himself that was totally pro CRNA. By 1908 one CRNA (Magaw) had done over 14,000 drip ether cases for Mayo. Dude if you want to talk history bring it on.

Anyways whats the aurguement here about. Both CRNA's and MDA's understand the differences b/t the 2. Of course there are proveable differences like education, degrees, training. But Outcome differences have yet to have been proven. We are pretty much where we were politically in the early 1900's us wanting to maintain and expand or practice rights, and MDA's wanting to take them away and control the entire field. Now shouldnt that tell us something. That if politically things are near the same as they were 80yrs ago that in the future things are not going to change that much. Im sure CRNA's and MDA's felt the same way and said similar to the same things back in the day. So quit crying and face reality, CRNA's are here to stay like it or not. Another person can do your job, so get over it.

 

[fishtolive]

Another person can do your job, so get over it.

I think this is probably why CRNAs draw the heat they do...it seems a pretty prevalent attitude. Sad because you really do need them. But only in an assistant capacity. THe correct thing to say is that another person can do PARTS of your job. Never get too big for your briches.

 

[nitecap]

Depends on what area you are implying. Of course most CRNA's arent gonna do pain, Critical care ect. But im talking mainstream your regular old community hopspital with general, ortho, OB and bread and butter cases. Intraop a CRNA can do all of what you do.

As for specialization then it all depends on experience. Of course a MDA that did a CT fellowship and works in the CV OR is going to be great and better than any CRNA and MDA with minimal CT experience. Hey I train at a CRNA program within an anethesia residency. When we work together we have the same role, same attendings, they do nothing intraop that we cant.

Now dont think Im on a high saying one is better than the other or one smarter. Im not even going there. Just stating that in many situations and cases CRNA's can do just as effective as a job as a MDA. Listen we need both professions to ensure the availabilty of quality care for our citizens. The 2 will continue to exist and butt heads Im sure. Its the same as interventional rads vs. Cardio, Intensivist crosing over and managing renal things and renal getting pissed, AA vs CRNA's, RN's vs LVN's, Janitors vs. professional maid yada yada.

Microsoft vs. Macintosh which is better, which is safer, which has more research put into it, which malfucntions more, which is more efficient which is more reliable. Everyone has their opinion and no one has proof to back it up, but the two continue to compete fiercly for the market, put each other down and campaign against each other and oh yeah ocassionally though rare work togther to accomplish something.

 

[Noyac]

Mountaindew, WHY?


So much to learn!

Don't misunderstand me here, I like your enthusiasm.

But posts like this never accomplish anything and just piss everyone off.



Please, close the thread.

 

[davvid2700]

IF CRNAS wanted to practice independently, why dont they go to medical school.. Thats a physicians job to practice independently.. i mean when did they get privileges to prescribe medicine.. let alone narcotics? I just cant believe the set on the crna organization. I mean its harder and harder for me to get privileged at a hospital and the crnas come along and practice independently and make more than most internists with a RN degree. You dont see me trying to do a nurses job.. do you?

 

[lvspro]

If I may reiterate




btw: I like the way you pulled off insulting DO's, IMG's, and CRNA's in one fell swoop. Quite effective.

 

[mountaindew2006]

If I may reiterate




btw: I like the way you pulled off insulting DO's, IMG's, and CRNA's in one fell swoop. Quite effective.

not to be confrontational at all. however, i was simply stating the facts. Almost at any residency program albeit "Top 10" there are an increased # of FMGs/DOs. The specialty was not competitive for quite some time and FMGs went into it because fluent English was not necessary. check this article out written by Dr. McDade over at U of C about Anesthesiology:

http://www.ama-assn.org/ama/pub/category/7475.html#Anesthesiology

Not to insult FMGs etc. But realize YOU chose the path and well you cant be sensitive about these issues. Everyone always has the option of an allo US school, perhaps not the first time around BUT if persistent it is possible. Those that choose the 'backway' in will need to come to grips with the path they chose, knowingly.

If it wasnt for the increased number of FMGs/DOs in high places trying to get more of their kind in now...it would be difficult for most of ya'll to match. Hey, this isnt my opinion here. I invite any of you all to go and pull aside the PD, program coordinator, or even residents about this issue at the places you interview--they'll tell ya the same.

 

[jwk]

IF CRNAS wanted to practice independently, why dont they go to medical school.. Thats a physicians job to practice independently.. i mean when did they get privileges to prescribe medicine.. let alone narcotics? I just cant believe the set on the crna organization. I mean its harder and harder for me to get privileged at a hospital and the crnas come along and practice independently and make more than most internists with a RN degree. You dont see me trying to do a nurses job.. do you?

Same old ****, different day. God I get tired of these threads.

Don't expect us "non-physician" anesthesia providers to apologize for our earnings compared to some physicians. It's all supply and demand when it comes to compensation. In a somewhat testy salary negotiation many years ago, one of my physician employers complained that we (the anesthetists) were making more than his wife who was a pediatrician. I just couldn't help myself when I said, "...then tell her to go to anesthesia school..."

We all have to live with the choices we make, right? Plastic surgeon grossing millions per year vs anesthesiologist in the mid-500k's? Internist at an HMO pulling in $150k salary for a 40hr week vs an anesthetist working 70hr weeks and making $200k or a rural CRNA covering 5 hospitals by herself in south Georgia and on call 24/7 for all of them and making $350k? No problem here. Simple supply and demand.

And dew - the prejudicial (looking for a nicer word) overtones of your rants about FMG's are a little startling for someone of your supposed education. I've been in anesthesia for a long time, and although I do know some FMG anesthesiologists and female anesthesiologists, I wasn't aware they represent the majority of practitioners in the field. You might find it shocking that some of them actually are competent providers and educators.

And here's a newsflash - if 50% of patients died from anesthesia in the "old days", those numbers applied to any type of practitioner, not just CRNA's. It took decades before anesthesia was safe by anyone's definition - and it's much safer now than it was 25 years ago when I started.

I know you young MS and CA-1 pups find this astounding, but folks like me and JPP and Mil and noyac and txanes get along just fine every day. The organizations are at each others throats, as well as some of the more politically active individuals in each group. But MD's and CRNA's and AA's get along great day in and day out in MOST practices around the country. We all have plenty of work to do, most of us make more than enough money to keep us happy, and we try not to kill or maim anyone and go home at the end of they day knowing that we've done the best job we can for our patients.

 

[EW1779]

please, please not this again. close it, for the love of chocolate milk.

 

[lvspro]

please, please not this again. close it, for the love of chocolate milk.

 

[mountaindew2006]

Firstly, I dont see how this thread has gone south. of course, the CRNAs have already started mud slinging by calling us MDAs "med students, CA1 pups" etc. I think thats a clear depiction of how CRNAs act in the REAL world...their respect for their superiors are dwindling down.

This CRNA vs MDA topic is a REAL WORLD topic. We're being civil in here...i think those of you who are CRNAs should either 1)be less sensitive and stop the mud slinging OR 2)leave the MDA forum and go back to the CRNA forum.

This thread just goes to show how once again the hungry CRNAs float over to the MDA territory and try to get information,etc.

Future MDAs, students, etc Let this be a lesson of what is in store for the future if we do not stand united against these undermining and disrespectful folk. We all went through med school, residency and are going into Anesthesiology for various reasons...do not let the CRNAs rape the profession!!

 

[MAC10]

Its pretty sad that everytime this topic comes up the forum is quick to get shut down. This is one of the major issues facing our profession. Young pup MS4 or CA-1 or not, this site IS called student doctor network and we should be able to discuss this important issue and share information about the subject with our collegues without being shut down.

 

[MAC10]

Firstly, I dont see how this thread has gone south. of course, the CRNAs have already started mud slinging by calling us MDAs "med students, CA1 pups" etc. I think thats a clear depiction of how CRNAs act in the REAL world...their respect for their superiors are dwindling down.

This CRNA vs MDA topic is a REAL WORLD topic. We're being civil in here...i think those of you who are CRNAs should either 1)be less sensitive and stop the mud slinging OR 2)leave the MDA forum and go back to the CRNA forum.

This thread just goes to show how once again the hungry CRNAs float over to the MDA territory and try to get information,etc.

Future MDAs, students, etc Let this be a lesson of what is in store for the future if we do not stand united against these undermining and disrespectful folk. We all went through med school, residency and are going into Anesthesiology for various reasons...do not let the CRNAs rape the profession!!

Mountindew, posted at the same time and you read my mind. Uhh kinda.
Let me add this...I get along with most of the CRNAs at my program, especially the older ones. My relationship is the younger ones and SRNAs is much more superficial. There is some underyling tension between them and residents. The way I see it, MDAs are here to stay and CRNAs arent going anywhere either. Their lobbing power is a huge advantage for them, one of the CRNAs here is friends with the presidents mother. How is that for lobbying power. Since it looks like we will both be around, we have got to come to some middle ground. Im not sure where that is....

I personally like the idea of the anesthesia care team, with the MDA leading the way with preop eval, anesthetic plan, intraop "event", and post op management. I agree with Mil i dont think an ologist needs to warm to stool for every MAC breast biopsy on a 22 year old ASA1. That model just seems win win for everyone, financially and intellectually.

 

[jwk]

Firstly, I dont see how this thread has gone south. of course, the CRNAs have already started mud slinging by calling us MDAs "med students, CA1 pups" etc. I think thats a clear depiction of how CRNAs act in the REAL world...their respect for their superiors are dwindling down.

This CRNA vs MDA topic is a REAL WORLD topic. We're being civil in here...i think those of you who are CRNAs should either 1)be less sensitive and stop the mud slinging OR 2)leave the MDA forum and go back to the CRNA forum.

This thread just goes to show how once again the hungry CRNAs float over to the MDA territory and try to get information,etc.

Future MDAs, students, etc Let this be a lesson of what is in store for the future if we do not stand united against these undermining and disrespectful folk. We all went through med school, residency and are going into Anesthesiology for various reasons...do not let the CRNAs rape the profession!!

Read my profile - I'm an AA, not a CRNA - 100% anesthesia care team every day - no starry dreams of practicing independently.

I just get tired of the attitude that physicians know it all and that non-physicians are generally less than pond scum. (I'm not sure where FMG's fall in your scheme of things since you have a problem with them as well.)

 

[davvid2700]

Its pretty sad that everytime this topic comes up the forum is quick to get shut down. This is one of the major issues facing our profession. Young pup MS4 or CA-1 or not, this site IS called student doctor network and we should be able to discuss this important issue and share information about the subject with our collegues without being shut down.

I could not agree more with this statement..

 

[mountaindew2006]

Hey there MAC 10 etc


yes, I agree that it is horrible every time this topic surfaces, it gets shut down. The nurses have their lobbies and are always getting together and trying to invade our territory it seems. I think places like this forum would be ideal for us MDAs/future MDAs to gather and begin to start to lobby,etc OR atleast share ideas about how to lobby etc (in addition to what the ASA is doing).

Bottom line, nothing against FMGs. As I stated earlier and w/the article by Dr. McDade I provided, Anesthesiology used to be a FMG partial group of docs. Times have certainly changed and I believe US grads going into the field is great because most of us bring along great personalities and a desire to expand the profession (by means of research experience, etc....these days its hard to find med students that havent done atleast a few months of research etc). I think w/ this new 'gush' of med students into the field we will bring more prominent personalities and will only expand the science of Anesthesiology and as a result bring about better patient care, monitoring.

As someone pointed out. The old CRNAs are not the problem at all. I can and HAVE gotten along w/ them. The student CRNA and the 'younger' ones are the ones trying to expand their terrain and attempt to gradually obtain larger pieces of the pie. This MUST BE THWARTED.

I agree w/ guys like Mil Med in the sense that if its a easy MAC case, yup go ahead and let the CRNA do the job. However, if its GA we're talking about LIMIT their exposure! It's like anything else, when people get to partake in 'great cases', they become interested and want to pursue more. Are they really that interested in the case? Well here's an idea....GO TO MEDICAL SCHOOL. or else, take the MAC cases or whatever easy 'boring' case that exist.

I've got a strong personality and I've seen residents at places put the CRNAs in check. This thread was meant for the eyes of MDAs/future MDAs, if you CRNAs have problems please go back to your 'CRNA forum' and complain amongst each other. This thread was meant to shed light on this issue and to propagate healthy conversation about the topic to physicians/future MDAs.

Thanks.

 

[Noyac]

Firstly, I dont see how this thread has gone south. of course, the CRNAs have already started mud slinging by calling us MDAs "med students, CA1 pups" etc. I think thats a clear depiction of how CRNAs act in the REAL world...their respect for their superiors are dwindling down.

It went south when you conjured up the topic. The mudslinging started with your first thread (FMG's, DO's). When you get into practice you will see the real world and it will be quite different from your fairytale world, I guarantee. Do's and FMG's (not all of them are poor in English) are out there and they don't even make up the 1/2 of the practicing anesthesiologists. But if they did, WHO CARES? Can they do the work efficiently, safely and get along with others well? You better believe it and if you carry this "better that thou" mentality into practice you will find it a rude and humbling environment. You will get yourself into trouble someday whether it is an airway or whatever, and you will be to proud to step aside and have someone else give it a try because they are a DO, FMG, CRNA, AA or whatever. The result, a dead or permanently injured pt and all b/c of your pride. Suck it up DEW. There are a lot of good practitioners out there no matter what their route was to get there.

 

[Noyac]

As someone pointed out. The old CRNAs are not the problem at all. I can and HAVE gotten along w/ them. The student CRNA and the 'younger' ones are the ones trying to expand their terrain and attempt to gradually obtain larger pieces of the pie. This MUST BE THWARTED.

this is true that the younger SRNA and CRNA's are more militant. But they too will see the light when they get into practice, or they will have a very difficult time of it.

Just curious. Are you affraid that someone without a MD will be able to do your job as well as you or heaven forbid, better, if you allow them to do cases that are the bigger variety?

 

[jwk]

Firstly, I dont see how this thread has gone south. of course, the CRNAs have already started mud slinging by calling us MDAs "med students, CA1 pups" etc. I think thats a clear depiction of how CRNAs act in the REAL world...their respect for their superiors are dwindling down.

It went south when you conjured up the topic. The mudslinging started with your first thread (FMG's, DO's). When you get into practice you will see the real world and it will be quite different from your fairytale world, I guarantee. Do's and FMG's (not all of them are poor in English) are out there and they don't even make up the 1/2 of the practicing anesthesiologists. But if they did, WHO CARES? Can they do the work efficiently, safely and get along with others well? You better believe it and if you carry this "better that thou" mentality into practice you will find it a rude and humbling environment. You will get yourself into trouble someday whether it is an airway or whatever, and you will be to proud to step aside and have someone else give it a try because they are a DO, FMG, CRNA, AA or whatever. The result, a dead or permanently injured pt and all b/c of your pride. Suck it up DEW. There are a lot of good practitioners out there no matter what their route was to get there.

Well said.

 

[toughlife]

Hey there MAC 10 etc


yes, I agree that it is horrible every time this topic surfaces, it gets shut down. The nurses have their lobbies and are always getting together and trying to invade our territory it seems. I think places like this forum would be ideal for us MDAs/future MDAs to gather and begin to start to lobby,etc OR atleast share ideas about how to lobby etc (in addition to what the ASA is doing).

Bottom line, nothing against FMGs. As I stated earlier and w/the article by Dr. McDade I provided, Anesthesiology used to be a FMG partial group of docs. Times have certainly changed and I believe US grads going into the field is great because most of us bring along great personalities and a desire to expand the profession (by means of research experience, etc....these days its hard to find med students that havent done atleast a few months of research etc). I think w/ this new 'gush' of med students into the field we will bring more prominent personalities and will only expand the science of Anesthesiology and as a result bring about better patient care, monitoring.

As someone pointed out. The old CRNAs are not the problem at all. I can and HAVE gotten along w/ them. The student CRNA and the 'younger' ones are the ones trying to expand their terrain and attempt to gradually obtain larger pieces of the pie. This MUST BE THWARTED.

I agree w/ guys like Mil Med in the sense that if its a easy MAC case, yup go ahead and let the CRNA do the job. However, if its GA we're talking about LIMIT their exposure! It's like anything else, when people get to partake in 'great cases', they become interested and want to pursue more. Are they really that interested in the case? Well here's an idea....GO TO MEDICAL SCHOOL. or else, take the MAC cases or whatever easy 'boring' case that exist.

I've got a strong personality and I've seen residents at places put the CRNAs in check. This thread was meant for the eyes of MDAs/future MDAs, if you CRNAs have problems please go back to your 'CRNA forum' and complain amongst each other. This thread was meant to shed light on this issue and to propagate healthy conversation about the topic to physicians/future MDAs.

Thanks.

We need strong, aggressive and surgeon styly personalities in anesthesiology when it comes to dealing with the CRNAs.

 

[nitecap]

We need strong, aggressive and surgeon styly personalities in anesthesiology when it comes to dealing with the CRNAs.

Then you will have a big problem tough guy. All the CRNA's and AA's will quit your practice and go work else where in town. Your practice will shrink, you will be working your asss off and have no life, and your cool competitor across town will be reaping the benefits.

 

[davvid2700]

Then you will have a big problem tough guy. All the CRNA's and AA's will quit your practice and go work else where in town. Your practice will shrink, you will be working your asss off and have no life, and your cool competitor across town will be reaping the benefits.

not if the guy across town is that same way.. you will have to move out of state.. maybe where its rural and nobody cares what you do

 

[mountaindew2006]

not if the guy across town is that same way.. you will have to move out of state.. maybe where its rural and nobody cares what you do

exactly...thats wht i'm trying to get people here to be like. IF all of us MDAs act the same (or atleast most of us) we will have consistency. THen yes, as davvid pointed out, the CRNAs will have to fix their attitudes, or else take the boot and practice elsewhere.

TWO OTHER POINTS...please read this carefully, since most of you that are disputing me have come to conclusions that are not warranted.

1) The point of this thread is not to bash FMGs/DO. I was simply pointing out that FMGs comprised a GREAT majority of practicing MDAs at the present. As a result of this, most were 'subservient' to the 'all powerful' surgeon. Please refer to my link (which is PROOF and not just anecdotal evidence).

2) I do not have a problems with AAs. From my exposure to these individuals, they seem to do their jobs well and they know their limitations. Unlike the CRNAs who are militant and attempt to obtain more of the piece of the pie.

All this thread is meant to do is:
A) mk this topic aware of for future MDAs
B)Ban MDAs together like the CRNAs have done w/ their lobby groups.

I thoroughly believe that any CRNA contradicting this thread in any manner is simply trying to disban/discourage this congregation of MDAs. Start your own thread if you have a problem with the topic. I said this once and I'll say it again...this thread is for MDA/future MDAs....or others sympathetic w/the cause at hand.

Thanks

 

[TXANESTHETIST]

Firstly, I dont see how this thread has gone south. of course, the CRNAs have already started mud slinging by calling us MDAs "med students, CA1 pups" etc. I think thats a clear depiction of how CRNAs act in the REAL world...their respect for their superiors are dwindling down.

It went south when you conjured up the topic. The mudslinging started with your first thread (FMG's, DO's). When you get into practice you will see the real world and it will be quite different from your fairytale world, I guarantee. Do's and FMG's (not all of them are poor in English) are out there and they don't even make up the 1/2 of the practicing anesthesiologists. But if they did, WHO CARES? Can they do the work efficiently, safely and get along with others well? You better believe it and if you carry this "better that thou" mentality into practice you will find it a rude and humbling environment. You will get yourself into trouble someday whether it is an airway or whatever, and you will be to proud to step aside and have someone else give it a try because they are a DO, FMG, CRNA, AA or whatever. The result, a dead or permanently injured pt and all b/c of your pride. Suck it up DEW. There are a lot of good practitioners out there no matter what their route was to get there.

Yea, there is nothing left to say here. Mountaindew is a just a young jerk, who will one day be an older jerk whether he is an MD, nurse or janitor! You know by the title of the thread he was just trying to stir up trouble. I say to all those CRNA's who get drawn in and angered by things like this...save your energy, keep providing top quality care. As long as CRNA's continue to perform at the level they are, they aren't going anywhere. He will one day be humbled at great cost to someone else probably. Just let him live in his dream world while the rest of us work together in peace!

 

[mountaindew2006]

Yea, there is nothing left to say here. Mountaindew is a just a young jerk, who will one day be an older jerk whether he is an MD, nurse or janitor! You know by the title of the thread he was just trying to stir up trouble. I say to all those CRNA's who get drawn in and angered by things like this...save your energy, keep providing top quality care. As long as CRNA's continue to perform at the level they are, they aren't going anywhere. He will one day be humbled at great cost to someone else probably. Just let him live in his dream world while the rest of us work together in peace!

so ur done now right? by bye

now let us MDAs continue w/ the discussion on here. Gosh cant even read the whole point I was making about THIS THREAD IS FOR MDAs. I dont get how you can read vitals on a screen.

Anyways...go back to ur nurse forum and let us YOUNG jerks be (to all watching, please refer to how many times he's had to go down south and must resort to lowly tactics such as name calling. clear depiction of his level of education..typical).

At any rate..it's a good thing that a hella lot of us 'young jerks' are coming into the field...one word buddy...watch out

 

[militarymd]

please refer to how many times he's had to go down south and must resort to lowly tactics such as name calling. clear depiction of his level of education..typical).

I believe d2700 was doing a lot of name calling....and to another physician....and older physician

 

[foxtrot]

I think that alot of people on this forum are not so concerned about the fact that there are CRNA's. Rather, I think it is the fact that CRNA's want to practice independently without an Anesthesiologist. I would love to hear Military's thoughts on this and some of the other private practice guys who speak so highly of CRNA's. I defintely think that there is a need for CRNA's and I am coming around to the idea of the anesthesia team since CRNA's are definitely hear to stay. But I think it is concerning to many anesthesia residents who are at residencies where the younger CRNA's act like they know just as much about physiology and pharmacology as an Anesthesiologist. And have this chip on their shoulder thus perpetuating the idea that they should practice independently.
I am at a residency where there are alot of CRNAs. And I have to say, I really like the older ones. You can learn from them. It is the younger ones that concern me and they are the ones who make up the future AANA. These are also the same ones who have no bones about saying they should be able to practice independently which I completely disagree with. Perfect example is Military's thrombocytopenia case. Do they teach CRNA's about DDAVP is nursing school? I definitely think that threads like this should not be shut down and residents and medical students need to be informed about this argument because it is a serious one. There is no need to mud sling but this is an important topic that needs to be discussed.

 

[militarymd]

You know what? CRNAs already practice without having anesthesiologists around.

It is allowed in all 50 states.

That's right....they do it already...it is nothing new.

Should they be allowed to? Well, they are allowed to already. Are we going to reverse that? I doubt it.

Unless, we start sending every new anesthesiologist grad to every podunk place where no one wants to go.

As for team practices, anesthesiologists need to behave like physicians....be able to make medical recommendations (like my ddavp thing) that decrease risk to patients...etc.

 

[Noyac]

I think that alot of people on this forum are not so concerned about the fact that there are CRNA's. Rather, I think it is the fact that CRNA's want to practice independently without an Anesthesiologist. I would love to hear Military's thoughts on this and some of the other private practice guys who speak so highly of CRNA's. I defintely think that there is a need for CRNA's and I am coming around to the idea of the anesthesia team since CRNA's are definitely hear to stay. But I think it is concerning to many anesthesia residents who are at residencies where the younger CRNA's act like they know just as much about physiology and pharmacology as an Anesthesiologist. And have this chip on their shoulder thus perpetuating the idea that they should practice independently.
I am at a residency where there are alot of CRNAs. And I have to say, I really like the older ones. You can learn from them. It is the younger ones that concern me and they are the ones who make up the future AANA. These are also the same ones who have no bones about saying they should be able to practice independently which I completely disagree with. Perfect example is Military's thrombocytopenia case. Do they teach CRNA's about DDAVP is nursing school? I definitely think that threads like this should not be shut down and residents and medical students need to be informed about this argument because it is a serious one. There is no need to mud sling but this is an important topic that needs to be discussed.

I agree that the younger SRNA/CRNA's are the more militant ones and that they too have alot to learn when they come out of training. And believe me they will have a difficult time if they continue to act this way because they will have much fewer jobs to choose from. I was not too different than some of the Residents posting on here when I was in training. I had CRNA's that were awful to deal with in my training and I had a real distaste for them because of the few that I had to be around for my 4 yrs. I came out thinking this was an awful thing having CRNA's that want independence. I thought the specialty was in trouble and that I might have 10 good years at best of practice. Its not that way at all. The CRNA's (sorry I have not worked with AA's since residency so I am not refering to AA's at all) that I met and working within private practice were quite different. They were seasoned and much less militant. They had no problems with their work environment and we never got into the competition issue. They called for help when necessary and if you were cordial when you came to help they called more often which made me feel secure with them in the room. I have been on vacation with some and socialize often with them. They are good people just as we are. When you bash CRNA's in general you are lowering yourself to the level of the few that you distaste. You are no different. I know your concerns with the issue and I have some of the same concerns but the majority of the work force out there is concerned with getting the cases done in a safe and effeicient manner. Your enthusiasm is healthy and beneficial to the specialty but your experience in this issue is limited to the few CRNA's that you have come in contact with. Believe me, I dislike the militant " I can do anything you can do" types as much as you do. But they will learn as we all do that you need others from time to time and if they don't they will be moving on to another job.

 

[svaefinga]

As I am not familiar with anaesthesiology in the US yet, I am not familiar with this CRNA issue but Noyac Good to see some common sense here.

 

[mountaindew2006]

enough of the name calling etc....

we all need to have a certain sense of propriety on here so that this thread is maintained.

At any rate, let's get back to the point at hand...

Mil Med...I agree w/ what you said in one of these threads (not sure if it was this one or the NET CASH Thread) about more hands the better. My statement to you is, yes two sets of hands/heads are always better than one...cept y not assure that they are the extra hands/heads provided by a MDA.

Dude, using CRNAs is synonymous w/outsourcing to friggin Australia to read x rays for cheap. Secondly, the quality is definitely not there either. Atleast when radiology depts outsource, the are outsourcing to another PHYSICIAN. Not some radiology tech.

 

[bell412]

I think you guys are looking at the independence thing all wrong. They want independence practice rights because they HAVE to practice independently. Thank God somebody is willing to go to some little **** town in SD,ND,IA. If you don't want em there practicing independently then YOU simply go there. This is how this whole independent thing got started. No godamn CRNA wants your job. If you think that way, your high on crack.

 

[davvid2700]

enough of the name calling etc....


Mil Med...I agree w/ what you said in one of these threads (not sure if it was this one or the NET CASH Thread) about more hands the better. My statement to you is, yes two sets of hands/heads are always better than one...cept y not assure that they are the extra hands/heads provided by a MDA.

QUOTE]

Im not sure about 2 sets of hands better than one.. Not if the one set is working against the other set.

 

[toughlife]

Then you will have a big problem tough guy. All the CRNA's and AA's will quit your practice and go work else where in town. Your practice will shrink, you will be working your asss off and have no life, and your cool competitor across town will be reaping the benefits.

contrary to popular choice, I plan to work for my money and do not expect to make it off the backs of anyone else. I do not care to have a CRNA working for me. For once, money is part of the whole equation not the deciding factor on how I choose to practice.

 

[davvid2700]

contrary to popular choice, I plan to work for my money and do not expect to make it off the backs of anyone else. I do not care to have a CRNA working for me. For once, money is part of the whole equation not the deciding factor on how I choose to practice.

good for you!! thumbs up!

 

[jetproppilot]

contrary to popular choice, I plan to work for my money and do not expect to make it off the backs of anyone else. I do not care to have a CRNA working for me. For once, money is part of the whole equation not the deciding factor on how I choose to practice.

Your ideas are understood, but they are not reality.

The reality is that everything in the anesthesia business is not based on egos and money.

The reality is there are not enough anesthesiologists to occupy every anesthesia site. And even if residencies doubled their matches, there still wouldnt be enough.

I'm not against all-MD practices...actually thought I was headed to one (Vegas) right outta residency...felt alot like alot of you on the MD CRNA thing.

But I can tell you from an efficiency standpoint there is no comparison. The team approach wins.

My buddies in Vegas are consulted by surgeons, much like a cardiologist consults a heart surgeon. They drive around to different hospitals...say following a spine guy who has 6 cases at three different hospitals.

Alot of wasted time.