Final Medicare Physician Fee Schedule for 2013 Released

This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.
The link doesn't seem to work
 
Thanks so much for sharing the link. Interesting (yet disappointing) to look at their justifications for cutting reimbursements...
 
It's in the news

http://www.medpagetoday.com/PublicHealthPolicy/Medicare/35690

Email from ASTRO:

On November 1, 2012, CMS released the 2013 Proposed Physician Fee Schedule which included an estimated negative seven percent cut to radiation oncology and negative nine percent reduction to radiation therapy centers. While still a sizeable cut to radiation oncology, this is a significant reduction from the respective fifteen percent and nineteen percent cuts included in the 2013 proposed rule released in July.
 
Last edited:
Before everyone panics, remember that these cuts are occurring only for freestanding centers, not hospital-based facilities.

The two codes being cut are: 77418 (IMRT delivery) and 77373 (SBRT). Both of these codes can only be entered for radiation therapy delivered at non-facility (e.g. not a hospital) settings.
 
Well the problem is that no physician owns hospital linacs so this won't really help OUR bottom line in any meaningful way. If you're a hospital administrator though, kudos!

However, ASTRO views these cuts as a victory since what was initially proposed was twice as much.

See here.
 
Before everyone panics, remember that these cuts are occurring only for freestanding centers, not hospital-based facilities.

The two codes being cut are: 77418 (IMRT delivery) and 77373 (SBRT). Both of these codes can only be entered for radiation therapy delivered at non-facility (e.g. not a hospital) settings.

Well the problem is that no physician owns hospital linacs so this won't really help OUR bottom line in any meaningful way. If you're a hospital administrator though, kudos!

However, ASTRO views these cuts as a victory since what was initially proposed was twice as much.

See here.

One thing I am learning more about is the role of ASTRO PAC vs some of the other PACs in radiation oncology like Vantage PAC and the Radiation Therapy Alliance. ASTRO does not necessarily have free-standing centers and the private practitioners who may own them in mind when they fight against cuts, as many of ASTRO's members are affiliated with academic, often hospital-based, centers. ASTRO is generally more protective of professional and hospital-based technical revenue over the interests of free-standing centers (many of who may or may not be owned by specialists outside of radiation oncology). ASTRO has a campaign against self-referral, which mainly targets free-standing centers. Unfortunately, Rad Onc-owned freestanding centers suffer from some of the collateral damage from these cuts. Rad Oncs who take a % cut of the global as their take-home pay from a freestanding center likewise will also feel the effects of these cuts more than their hospital-based brethren.
 
Last edited:
lots of discussion of bundle payment for radiation services in this CMS report. The job situation sounds like rather a mess already so this is not the most uplifting news but i guess it could have been worse. Is this a biannual thing? or could there be another cut next year?
 
lots of discussion of bundle payment for radiation services in this CMS report. The job situation sounds like rather a mess already so this is not the most uplifting news but i guess it could have been worse. Is this a biannual thing? or could there be another cut next year?

In negotiation 101 they tell you to make a ridiculous offer so that you can negotiate down. I see this as a loss no matter how "reasonable" the cuts are. Next time it will be another 5% to get closer to the original proposed cuts.
 
Before everyone panics, remember that these cuts are occurring only for freestanding centers, not hospital-based facilities.

The two codes being cut are: 77418 (IMRT delivery) and 77373 (SBRT). Both of these codes can only be entered for radiation therapy delivered at non-facility (e.g. not a hospital) settings.


Radiation oncologists who are hospital employees shouldn't even bother with these reports anyway.
 
I guess the party is over for Uro-Rads facilities...
 
Radiation oncologists who are hospital employees shouldn't even bother with these reports anyway.

Trying to understand the meaning of this statement.... can't.... please elaborate?
 
Trying to understand the meaning of this statement.... can't.... please elaborate?

Well, in my opinion, part of the benefit of being a hospital employee is getting to dissociate yourself somewhat from the business aspect of the whole deal. A hospital-employed radonc isn't going to be as involved in making decisions about the allocation of capital as one in a freestanding center, so short/medium-term business decisions which would be based on the physician fee schedule would be off his/her plate. As a private practitioner in a freestanding facility, your income will be much more closely tied to the fee schedule numbers.

I could be wrong, of course: If your hospital contract depends on any of the numbers that come from the fee schedule, then you'll see a difference in your income based on those changes. However, when I was interviewing for private practice jobs with hospital systems, this was not the case.
 
Interesting take by ASTRO calling it a victory. I mean, yes it is lower than it could have been, but the website is a little too joyous for my taste. The spin should have been, we got F'd, let's lobby/lawyer up for the next round and protect ourselves.
 
Trying to understand the meaning of this statement.... can't.... please elaborate?

Well, in my opinion, part of the benefit of being a hospital employee is getting to dissociate yourself somewhat from the business aspect of the whole deal. A hospital-employed radonc isn't going to be as involved in making decisions about the allocation of capital as one in a freestanding center, so short/medium-term business decisions which would be based on the physician fee schedule would be off his/her plate. As a private practitioner in a freestanding facility, your income will be much more closely tied to the fee schedule numbers.

I could be wrong, of course: If your hospital contract depends on any of the numbers that come from the fee schedule, then you'll see a difference in your income based on those changes. However, when I was interviewing for private practice jobs with hospital systems, this was not the case.

If it's a global/Joint venture type arrangement though, then both groups have skin in the game and both would have something to lose.

Interesting take by ASTRO calling it a victory. I mean, yes it is lower than it could have been, but the website is a little too joyous for my taste. The spin should have been, we got F'd, let's lobby/lawyer up for the next round and protect ourselves.

Agreed. We didn't get hit nearly this bad a couple years ago
 
Radiation oncologists who are hospital employees shouldn't even bother with these reports anyway.

I am a hospital employee, but disagree.
1. We should do a better job of sticking together. First as radiation oncologists, then as oncologists, then as specialists, then as MDs. When we take a totally self serving view point (oh that doesn't effect me) its easier to continue payment cuts. IF we stick together and lobby together it will be harder. Next time it may be profees...

2. Just because you are a hospital employee today, doesn't mean you'll be one tomorrow. Over half of new attendings change jobs in the first few years out of residency.

3. The fact that free standing centers exist (where presumably a higher salary can be made) helps maintain higher salaries for hospital employees. Guarantee you that the hospital wants to employee you for as little as possible. The more leverage they have the less you will make.
 
Even if you are an employee how much the hospital will reimburse you is likely influenced by how much money you bring in (ok this round of cuts were only directed at free standing centers but the trend is established for cutting) and how much money they know you could make elsewhere. A hospital knows they have to offer at least a certain amount to attract a radiation oncologist but if the value of our services decreases it will be noticed. It may be slower but cuts to fees for radiation oncology will impact employed physicians as well.
 
Top