Just wondering what would be the proper applciations for flowable composite vs. regular Z100 composite? Can you use flowable in areas of minimal occlusal force, such as the facials of anterior and posterior teeth? 🙄
-
CycleTrack and SDN are teaming up to make medical school admissions more transparent and accessible! Read the announcement to learn how we’re supporting the future of CycleTrack’s free application-tracking tools .
Flowable vs. Z100 Composite
Started by tooth_sleuth
Get help with your application
Use all the free resources available to you from SDN: articles, guides, expert advising, forums discussions, and school research.
tooth_sleuth said:
My dentist used flowable to replace a temp filling on a RCT i had on tooth #9. So my answer would be yes (I Hope 😱 ) 😀
I like using flowable resins in the following manner:
After matrixing a Class-II cavity prep, I flow in some flowable to seal up where the matrix band meets up with tooth structure, cure it, then fill up the rest of the cavity with regular-consistency resin (I use Tetric Ceram). This ensures that I won't leave voids in the interproximal parts of the restoration.
The clinical instructors where I went to school also prefer using something like Heliomolar flow for small Class-I cavities.
There are many other applications for flowable resins, but those are the two instances where I use them the most.
HTH!
After matrixing a Class-II cavity prep, I flow in some flowable to seal up where the matrix band meets up with tooth structure, cure it, then fill up the rest of the cavity with regular-consistency resin (I use Tetric Ceram). This ensures that I won't leave voids in the interproximal parts of the restoration.
The clinical instructors where I went to school also prefer using something like Heliomolar flow for small Class-I cavities.
There are many other applications for flowable resins, but those are the two instances where I use them the most.
HTH!
