Fluoro and US billing

This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.

Pain Applicant1

Full Member
15+ Year Member
Joined
May 26, 2010
Messages
5,076
Reaction score
2,936
I own both my fluoro and US unit. My procedures are done in my office (non-facility) but for some reason I can't get reimbursed for image guidance unless I use modifier 26. However, 26 is only the pro fee and I own these machines so I should be reimbursed the global fee to include both 26 and TC. Anyone have any insight into this?
 
You shouldnt have to use the modifier. Which payors or are all of them doing that.

I know we have been getting paid for the 77003
 
I think it's mostly Medicare. I have Palmetto GBA. No issues for anyone else?
 
I think it's mostly Medicare. I have Palmetto GBA. No issues for anyone else?

Also Palmetto

Checked with billing people and haven't had major issues except a rare denial for a couple that were billed out wrong accidentally.


Sent from my iPhone using SDN Mobile
 
Thanks, I'll have to dive deeper into this issue. BTW, was it you requesting info on my SCS prices? I'll PM you.
 
Just to confirm, US got nailed this year, right? Is the ASIPP 2014 reimbursement info on this correct? ~$200 down to ~$70?? Sighhhhh
 
Upon reading this thread, I did little research to find below schedule.
http://www.painmed.org/PracticeMana...eleases-2014-medicare-physician-fee-schedule/

The article suggests that while overall reimbursement did go down, they did increase reimbursement for in-office procedure (63650). But then there was also a doctor (presumably) who commented that even with that increase, L8680 change(?) is making overall reimbursement reduction by 50%? But isn't L8680 spinal implant related code?

I'm trying to catch up on these changes and got little confused. Would anyone here be willing to explain how these changes actually effect the in-practice procedures?
Thank you for your help!
 
can someone comment or PM me on how 76942 compares to 77002? ex: hip

or, 77003 vs 76942 for caudal
 
can someone comment or PM me on how 76942 compares to 77002? ex: hip

or, 77003 vs 76942 for caudal

Check here:

http://asipp.org/documents/Physicians2014F.pdf

76942=$74 (someone on a previous thread claims this is being reversed. No word yet from ASIPP)

77003=$90

77002=$90-$100 (I think, but ASIPP took it off their site for some reason. When they had it up, the 77002 was one of our fee codes that went up)
 
Upon reading this thread, I did little research to find below schedule.
http://www.painmed.org/PracticeMana...eleases-2014-medicare-physician-fee-schedule/

The article suggests that while overall reimbursement did go down, they did increase reimbursement for in-office procedure (63650). But then there was also a doctor (presumably) who commented that even with that increase, L8680 change(?) is making overall reimbursement reduction by 50%? But isn't L8680 spinal implant related code?

I'm trying to catch up on these changes and got little confused. Would anyone here be willing to explain how these changes actually effect the in-practice procedures?
Thank you for your help!


This has all been gone over as nauseum on the 2014 billing update and RIP Stim threads, but to summarize (of the top of my head):

Last year 2 lead (16 contact, >$400 per contact) in office stim trial paid approx $5700 for the leads (L8680 = $6700 minus approx $1000 for 2 leads). L 8680 now no longer pays $6700. It now pays zero dollars.

63650 payed approx $437 per lead last year. It now pays approx $1349 for 1 lead and $647 for the second. Subtract from this lead cost, which this year has dropped from about $1,000 for 2 leads last year, to $200-$400 for two leads this year.

So last year a 2 lead in office stim trial netted >$6,000 (Medicare, L8680+63650-lead cost)

This year a 2 lead stim trial in office nets $1596-$1796 ($1996 for 63650s-lead cost)

That's a 70-80% cut depending on your lead price, how many leads/contacts you do, etc.

Of course it all varies based on the secondary insurance, your state etc. of course, none of this applies to private insurances, ASC or Hosp procedures.

This is for Medicare. Check here:

http://asipp.org/documents/Physicians2014F.pdf
 
Top